![Prediction And Head To Head Kamil Majchrzak Vs. Jonas Forejtek Nhsccyi0pc Prediction and head to head Kamil Majchrzak vs. Jonas Forejtek](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Kamil-Majchrzak-vs.-Jonas-Forejtek-nHSCcyi0pc.jpg)
Kamil Majchrzak and Jonas Forejtek will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Skopje Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 2:00 pm on CENTRAL COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kamil Majchrzak who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kamil Majchrzak is the pick to win this match.
Kamil Majchrzak -> 1.57
Jonas Forejtek -> 2.31
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Kamil Majchrzak vs. Jonas Forejtek
There is no head to head record between Kamil Majchrzak and Jonas Forejtek since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Kamil Majchrzak
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Kamil Majchrzak](https://tennistonic.com/engine/handlers/players_images_new/Kamil-Majchrzak.jpg)
34 - 7win/loss
192
75
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 48-10 | 16-4 | 30-5 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 28-22 | 19-10 | 4-6 | 4-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 34-21 | 4-4 | 16-9 | 5-5 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 12-10 | 1-3 | 5-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 351, Kamil reached the 2nd round after beating Gauthier Onclin 6-2 6-3.
In the 1st round, Kamil had a good straight sets win against Onclin (6-2 6-3). During the match, Majchrzak scored 64 points vs Onclin’s 47. Majchrzak was pretty aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, Majchrzak recorded 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Kamil Majchrzak lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Majchrzak put 65% of his first serves in, winning 64% (25/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 67% (14/21) on the 2nd serve. The Pole broke Onclin 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Majchrzak has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (332-193). 16-2 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Majchrzak has a compiled 182-99 match record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Kigali 1 Challenger where he beat Marco Trungelliti in the final 6-4 6-4.
The Pole has an aggregate 34-7 win-loss record in 2024, 16-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Skopje Challenger
The Pole has never competed in this tournament before.
Jonas Forejtek
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Jonas Forejtek](https://tennistonic.com/engine/handlers/players_images_new/6482Jonas-Forejtek.jpg)
25 - 14win/loss
352
217
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 27-17 | 5-4 | 14-10 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 22-21 | 0-3 | 17-10 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2022 | 32-24 | 3-2 | 14-11 | 14-9 | 0-1 | 1-1 |
2021 | 35-31 | 2-2 | 13-18 | 16-9 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
2020 | 20-11 | 2-3 | 13-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
Ranked no. 356, the Czech got to the 2nd round after beating Nikoloz Basilashvili 6-2 6-2.
In the 1st round, Forejtek had a good straight sets win against Basilashvili (6-2 6-2). During the match Forejtek scored 61 points vs Basilashvili’s 39. Forejtek was quite aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about serving, Forejtek blasted 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Jonas Forejtek was extremely efficient on serve to win 81% (22/27) of his 1st serve and 62% (13/21) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Czech broke Basilashvili 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
Forejtek’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Esch/Alzette.
Jonas has a compiled 25-14 win-loss record in 2024, 12-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Majchrzak | Forejtek |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 17 | 16 |
Pts | 64-47 | 61-39 |
Total Points | 111 | 100 |
Winners | 25 | 22 |
%Winners | 39% | 36% |
Both Majchrzak and Forejtek played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Majchrzak and Forejtek have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Majchrzak played 1 game more than Forejtek. Kamil scored 25 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Jonas struck 22 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Majchrzak | Forejtek |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 7 |
Avg per match | 2 | 7 |
1st in | 39/60 | 27/48 |
%1st in | 65% | 56% |
1st pts | 25/39 | 22/27 |
%1st pts | 64% | 81% |
2nd pts | 14/21 | 13/21 |
%2nd pts | 67% | 62% |
Majchrzak bagged 2 aces . Forejtek recorded 7 aces . Majchrzak won 64% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Forejtek won 81% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Majchrzak | Forejtek |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 4 |
Converted | 4/11 | 4/12 |
% Converted | 36% | 33% |
Conceded | 3 | 1 |
Saved | 2 | 1 |
% Saved | 67% | 100% |
Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Kamil broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Majchrzak dropped his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The Czech broke his opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. Forejtek was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
Majchrzak | |||
R1 Onclin |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
pts | 64-47 | 64-47 | |
Total points | 111 | 111 | |
Winners | 25 | 25 | |
%Winners | 39% | 39% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 39/60 | 39/60 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
1st pts | 25/39 | 25/39 | |
% 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
2nd pts | 14/21 | 14/21 | |
% 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Forejtek | |||
R1 Basilashvili |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | 61-39 | 61-39 | |
Total points | 100 | 100 | |
Winners | 22 | 22 | |
%Winners | 36% | 36% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 7 | 7 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 27/48 | 27/48 | |
% 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
1st pts | 22/27 | 22/27 | |
% 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
2nd pts | 13/21 | 13/21 | |
% 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Skopje Challenger
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Ryan NijboerNijboer (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Mirza BasicBasic – Samuel Vincent RuggeriVincent Ruggeri (7-67 6-1) – See score progression
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Luka MikrutMikrut (6-4 7-68) – See score progression
- Alexander WeisWeis – Johan NiklesNikles (3-6 7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Alexandar LazarovLazarov (7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Jiri VeselyVesely (6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Joel SchwaerzlerSchwaerzler – Sergey FominFomin (5-7 7-5 3-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Neil OberleitnerOberleitner – Bor ArtnakArtnak (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Federico CinaCina (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski – Orlando LuzLuz (6-75 7-69 4-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee – Jay ClarkeClarke (6-1 6-74 6-3) – See score progression
- Matej DodigDodig – Alexis GautierGautier (7-5 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexander WeisWeis – Johan NiklesNikles (3-6 7-6(3) 6-4) – See score progression
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Mirza BasicBasic – Samuel Vincent RuggeriVincent Ruggeri (7-6(7) 6-1) – See score progression
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Jiri VeselyVesely (6-4 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Luka MikrutMikrut (6-4 7-6(8)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mirza BasicBasic – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona – Alexander WeisWeis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Neil OberleitnerOberleitner – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (0-0) – H2H and prediction