Paul Jubb and Altug Celikbilek will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Kachreti Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Paul Jubb who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Paul Jubb is the pick to win this match.
Paul Jubb -> 1.47
Altug Celikbilek -> 2.56
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Paul Jubb vs. Altug Celikbilek
There is no head to head record between Paul Jubb and Altug Celikbilek since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Paul Jubb
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 38-17 | 20-7 | 0-2 | 9-4 | 9-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 323, Paul reached the 2nd round after defeating Orel Kimhi 6-1 6-1.
In the 1st round, Jubb had a good straight sets win against Kimhi (6-1 6-1). During the match, Jubb scored 65 points vs Kimhi’s 39. Paul was quite aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Regarding the service games, Jubb struck 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Paul Jubb was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 81% (25/31) of his 1st serve and 55% (6/11) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Paul broke Kimhi 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Jubb has a fantastic record in the last 8 years having won 70% of his matches (196-83). 18-6 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Jubb has a composed111-41 record in the last 8 years on hard.
Jubb’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Glasgow Challenger and M25 Nottingham.
The Brit has an aggregate 27-12 win-loss record in 2024, 18-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Kachreti Challenger
Jubb has never competed in this tournament before.
Altug Celikbilek
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20-15 | 14-9 | 0-0 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 20-27 | 8-12 | 0-3 | 9-9 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-30 | 13-13 | 4-7 | 10-8 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 42-24 | 23-11 | 1-2 | 15-8 | 3-2 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 14-10 | 3-2 | 7-4 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 408, Celikbilek reached the 2nd round after beating Cem Ilkel 6-75 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round against Ilkel, Celikbilek recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-75 6-4 6-3). During the match Celikbilek scored 108 points vs Ilkel’s 93. The Turk was quite aggressive to blast 50 winners.
Talking about serving, Celikbilek recorded 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Altug Celikbilek lost the serve once. Furthermore, Celikbilek put 72% of his first serves in, winning 79% (50/63) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (11/25) on the 2nd serve. The Turk broke Ilkel 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Altug has a compiled 15-12 win-loss record in 2024, 9-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jubb | Celikbilek |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 14 | 32 |
| Pts | 65-39 | 108-93 |
| Total Points | 104 | 201 |
| Winners | 25 | 50 |
| %Winners | 38% | 46% |
Both Jubb and Celikbilek played 1 match. At the moment, Altug Celikbilek lost 1 set while Paul Jubb hasn’t conceded a set so far. Jubb has played 1 set(s) less than Celikbilek (2 vs 3). Therefore, Jubb played 18 games less than Celikbilek. Jubb scored 25 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The Turk recorded 50 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jubb | Celikbilek |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 7 |
| 1st in | 31/42 | 63/88 |
| %1st in | 74% | 72% |
| 1st pts | 25/31 | 50/63 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 6/11 | 11/25 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 44% |
Jubb blasted 7 aces . Celikbilek recorded 7 aces . Jubb won 81% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Celikbilek won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jubb | Celikbilek |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/12 | 4/7 |
| % Converted | 42% | 57% |
| Conceded | 0 | 1 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Paul broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. Paul had a solid display on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. Celikbilek broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Altug conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Jubb | |||
| R1 Kimhi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 65-39 | 65-39 | |
| Total points | 104 | 104 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 31/42 | 31/42 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 74% | |
| 1st pts | 25/31 | 25/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Celikbilek | |||
| R1 Ilkel |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-75 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 108-93 | 108-93 | |
| Total points | 201 | 201 | |
| Winners | 50 | 50 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 63/88 | 63/88 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 50/63 | 50/63 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/25 | 11/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWLLWL
LWWWLWWLWL Tennis Scores in Kachreti Challenger
- Robert StrombachsStrombachs – Alafia AyeniAyeni (6-4 2-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – Ryuki MatsudaMatsuda (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Aleksandre BakshiBakshi – Martyn PawelskiPawelski (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Egor GerasimovGerasimov – Menelaos EfstathiouEfstathiou (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Giles HusseyHussey – Nikolay VylegzhaninVylegzhanin (6-76 7-64 6-1) – See score progression
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Cem IlkelIlkel (6-75 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Yshai OlielOliel (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Matias SotoSoto – Zura TkemaladzeTkemaladze (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Hamish StewartStewart (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (7-64 7-65) – See score progression
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – Yanki ErelErel (6-2 7-64) – See score progression
- Blake MottMott – Ricardas BerankisBerankis (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Vadym UrsuUrsu – Alberto Barroso CamposBarroso Campos (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Orel KimhiKimhi (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Charles BroomBroom – Roberto Cid SuberviCid Subervi (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Robin BertrandBertrand – Bogdan BobrovBobrov (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Hamish StewartStewart (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Yshai OlielOliel (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Egor GerasimovGerasimov – Menelaos EfstathiouEfstathiou (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Blake MottMott – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandre BakshiBakshi – Vadym UrsuUrsu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – Charles BroomBroom (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matias SotoSoto – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
