Vilius Gaubas and Daniel Masur will play each other in the 2nd round of the Augsburg Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 5:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Vilius Gaubas who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Vilius Gaubas is the pick to win this match.
Vilius Gaubas -> 1.56
Daniel Masur -> 2.33
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Vilius Gaubas vs. Daniel Masur
There is no head to head record between Vilius Gaubas and Daniel Masur since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Vilius Gaubas
26 - 13win/loss
276
276
LWWLWLWLLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-15 | 5-3 | 22-11 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 59-26 | 3-3 | 55-21 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-17 | 4-4 | 15-12 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 283 (career-high), Vilius got to the 2nd round after defeating Evan Furness 7-62 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Lithuanian had a good straight sets win against Furness (7-62 6-3). During the match, Gaubas scored 80 points vs Furness’s 68. Gaubas was very aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gaubas struck 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Vilius Gaubas was extremely effective on serve to win 74% (31/42) of his 1st serve and 57% (16/28) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Gaubas broke Furness twice after converting 25% of his break points (2/8).
Gaubas has a solid record in the last 4 years having won 63% of his matches (107-62). 20-9 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Gaubas has a composed92-46 win-loss record in the last 4 years on clay.
Vilius’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Antalya,M25 Faro and the Rome Challenger.
Gaubas has an overall 26-13 win-loss record in 2024, 20-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Augsburg Challenger
The Lithuanian has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniel Masur
30 - 8win/loss
301
176
LLWWLWWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-11 | 1-2 | 5-3 | 16-4 | 0-1 | 12-1 |
| 2023 | 34-24 | 7-8 | 9-7 | 9-5 | 0-1 | 9-3 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 7-8 | 5-6 | 4-9 | 5-3 | 4-2 |
| 2021 | 28-26 | 4-4 | 1-7 | 15-12 | 3-2 | 5-1 |
| 2020 | 15-14 | 3-2 | 2-5 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
Ranked no. 310, Daniel got to the 2nd round after defeating Michael Geerts 6-1 5-7 6-4.
In the 1st round, The German defeated Geerts (6-1 5-7 6-4). During the match Masur scored 99 points vs Geerts’s 85. Daniel was very aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Masur blasted 10 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Daniel Masur lost the serve 3 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Masur put 58% of his first serves in, winning 78% (38/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (17/36) on the 2nd serve. The German broke Geerts 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Daniel’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Cadolzburg,M25 Nussloch,M25 Trento and the Lugano Challenger.
Daniel has a compiled 30-8 win-loss record in 2024, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Augsburg Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gaubas | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 29 |
| Pts | 80-68 | 99-85 |
| Total Points | 148 | 184 |
| Winners | 31 | 38 |
| %Winners | 39% | 38% |
Both Gaubas and Masur played 1 match. At the moment, Daniel Masur surrendered 1 set while Vilius Gaubas hasn’t dropped a set so far. Gaubas has played 1 set(s) less than Masur (2 vs 3). Therefore, Gaubas played 7 games less than Masur. The Lithuanian scored 31 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Daniel scored 38 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gaubas | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 10 |
| 1st in | 42/70 | 49/85 |
| %1st in | 60% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 31/42 | 38/49 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 16/28 | 17/36 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 47% |
Gaubas blasted 2 aces . Masur made 10 aces . Gaubas won 74% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Masur won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gaubas | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 5 |
| Converted | 2/8 | 5/12 |
| % Converted | 25% | 42% |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 |
| Saved | 3 | 1 |
| % Saved | 75% | 25% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
The Lithuanian broke his opponent twice with a 25% conversion rate. Vilius lost his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Daniel broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. Daniel conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 25% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gaubas | |||
| R1 Furness |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 80-68 | 80-68 | |
| Total points | 148 | 148 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 42/70 | 42/70 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 31/42 | 31/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/28 | 16/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 2/8 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Masur | |||
| R1 Geerts |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 5-7 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 99-85 | 99-85 | |
| Total points | 184 | 184 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 49/85 | 49/85 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 38/49 | 38/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/36 | 17/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 1/4 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 25% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLWLLW
LLWWLWWWLL Tennis Scores in Augsburg Challenger
- Diego Dedura-PalomeroDedura-Palomero – Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva (6-71 7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Liam GavrielidesGavrielides (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Daniel MasurMasur – Michael GeertsGeerts (6-1 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Elmer MollerMoller – Marko TopoTopo (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Vilius GaubasGaubas – Evan FurnessFurness (7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Toby Alex KodatAlex Kodat – Oscar OtteOtte (7-67 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Moez EcharguiEchargui (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Hazem NaowNaow (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Tom GentzschGentzsch – Felix GillGill (6-1 7-63) – See score progression
- Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez – Adolfo Daniel VallejoDaniel Vallejo (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Liam GavrielidesGavrielides (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lucas GerchGerch – Luca GiacominiGiacomini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mateus De Carvalho CardosoDe Carvalho Cardoso – Andrea CollariniCollarini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luca PotenzaPotenza – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – August HolmgrenHolmgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PicchionePicchione – Norbert GombosGombos (0-0) – H2H and prediction
