Charles Broom and Daniil Glinka will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Kachreti Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:00 am on COURT 3. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Charles Broom who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Charles Broom is the pick to win this match.
Charles Broom -> 1.38
Daniil Glinka -> 2.89
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Charles Broom vs. Daniil Glinka
There is no head to head record between Charles Broom and Daniil Glinka since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Charles Broom
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-33 | 19-13 | 0-0 | 14-13 | 8-7 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-34 | 8-7 | 0-4 | 20-15 | 11-6 | 2-2 |
| 2022 | 44-30 | 28-17 | 0-0 | 10-7 | 6-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-10 | 20-6 | 8-3 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-3 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 285 (career-high), the Brit reached the 2nd round after beating Roberto Cid Subervi 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Broom had a good straight sets win against Cid (6-3 6-4). During the match, Broom scored 67 points vs Cid’s 48. Charles was very aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Broom scored 11 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Charles Broom lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Broom put 67% of his first serves in, winning 82% (32/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (9/19) on the 2nd serve. Charles broke Cid 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Broom has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 64% of his matches (198-109). 15-6 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Broom has an aggregate92-45 win-loss record in the last 8 years on hard.
Charles’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Nottingham.
Broom has an overall 22-12 win-loss record in 2024, 15-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Kachreti Challenger
Charles has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniil Glinka
21 - 16win/loss
488
390
LLLWWWLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 37-29 | 19-14 | 0-1 | 14-12 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
| 2023 | 40-23 | 18-14 | 0-1 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 7-2 |
| 2022 | 23-29 | 17-22 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 29-31 | 9-14 | 12-11 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-11 | 10-8 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 454, Daniil got to the 2nd round after beating Yanki Erel 6-2 7-64.
In the 1st round, The Estonian had a good straight sets win against Erel (6-2 7-64). During the match Glinka scored 73 points vs Erel’s 62. The Estonian was very aggressive to blast 36 winners.
About the serving games, Glinka fired 13 aces and he was extremely solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Daniil Glinka was quite efficient on serve to win 72% (36/50) of his 1st serve and 86% (12/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Glinka broke Erel twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Glinka’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Trento,M15 Poitiers,M25 Trimbach and M25 Kachreti.
The Estonian has a compiled 21-16 win-loss record in 2024, 6-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Broom | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 21 |
| Pts | 67-48 | 73-62 |
| Total Points | 115 | 135 |
| Winners | 32 | 36 |
| %Winners | 48% | 49% |
Both Broom and Glinka played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Broom and Glinka have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Broom played 2 games less than Glinka. The Brit scored 32 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, The Estonian recorded 36 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Broom | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 11 | 13 |
| 1st in | 39/58 | 50/64 |
| %1st in | 67% | 78% |
| 1st pts | 32/39 | 36/50 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 9/19 | 12/14 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 86% |
Broom managed to score 11 aces . Glinka fired 13 aces . Broom won 82% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Glinka won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 86% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Broom | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 2 |
| Converted | 4/5 | 2/7 |
| % Converted | 80% | 29% |
| Conceded | 5 | 3 |
| Saved | 4 | 3 |
| % Saved | 80% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Broom broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Glinka broke his opponent twice with a 29% conversion rate. Glinka was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Broom | |||
| R1 Cid |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 67-48 | 67-48 | |
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 39/58 | 39/58 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 32/39 | 32/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/19 | 9/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Glinka | |||
| R1 Erel |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 73-62 | 73-62 | |
| Total points | 135 | 135 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 13 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 50/64 | 50/64 | |
| % 1st in | 78% | 78% | |
| 1st pts | 36/50 | 36/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/14 | 12/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 86% | 86% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 2/7 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWWWLLW
LLLWWWLWWW Tennis Scores in Kachreti Challenger
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Hamish StewartStewart (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Matias SotoSoto – Zura TkemaladzeTkemaladze (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Cem IlkelIlkel (6-75 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Egor GerasimovGerasimov – Menelaos EfstathiouEfstathiou (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Giles HusseyHussey – Nikolay VylegzhaninVylegzhanin (6-76 7-64 6-1) – See score progression
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – Ryuki MatsudaMatsuda (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Yshai OlielOliel (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Robert StrombachsStrombachs – Alafia AyeniAyeni (6-4 2-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (7-64 7-65) – See score progression
- Aleksandre BakshiBakshi – Martyn PawelskiPawelski (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Vadym UrsuUrsu – Alberto Barroso CamposBarroso Campos (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Orel KimhiKimhi (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Blake MottMott – Ricardas BerankisBerankis (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Robin BertrandBertrand – Bogdan BobrovBobrov (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Charles BroomBroom – Roberto Cid SuberviCid Subervi (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – Yanki ErelErel (6-2 7-64) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Hamish StewartStewart (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Robert StrombachsStrombachs – Alafia AyeniAyeni (6-4 2-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (7-6(4) 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Yshai OlielOliel (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Matias SotoSoto – Zura TkemaladzeTkemaladze (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Egor GerasimovGerasimov – Menelaos EfstathiouEfstathiou (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Blake MottMott – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandre BakshiBakshi – Vadym UrsuUrsu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – Charles BroomBroom (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matias SotoSoto – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
