Rebecca Sramkova and Linda Fruhvirtova will play each other in the qualifications of the French Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 2:00 pm on Court 9. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Rebecca Sramkova who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Rebecca Sramkova is the pick to win this match.
Rebecca Sramkova -> 1.59
Linda Fruhvirtova -> 2.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Rebecca Sramkova vs. Linda Fruhvirtova
There is no head to head record between Rebecca Sramkova and Linda Fruhvirtova since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Rebecca Sramkova
20 - 10win/loss
43
43
WWLWWWWLLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 45-22 | 23-11 | 14-9 | 8-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-25 | 10-7 | 22-9 | 11-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-23 | 3-5 | 13-11 | 8-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-22 | 7-7 | 13-9 | 8-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 10-10 | 5-4 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 89 (career-high), Sramkova got to the qualifications after defeating Sarah Iliev 6-4 6-1.
In the qualifications, Sramkova had a good straight sets win against Iliev (6-4 6-1). During the match, Sramkova scored 69 points vs Iliev’s 47. Rebecca was quite aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sramkova couldn’t to score even 1 ace during the encounter and she committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Rebecca Sramkova was extremely efficient on serve to win 73% (19/26) of her 1st serve and 60% (12/20) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. Rebecca broke Iliev 5 times after converting 42% of her break points (5/12).
Sramkova has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 60% of her matches (297-200). 9-4 on clay in 2024. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Sramkova has a composed 169-94 record in the last years on clay.
Her best result of the current year was conquering the title the W50 Porto where she defeated Jessica Bouzas Maneiro in the final 6-7(4) 7-5 6-1.
Sramkova has a composed 20-10 win-loss record in 2024, 9-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the French Open
Linda Fruhvirtova
11 - 14win/loss
204
49
LWLLLLLLLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20-30 | 11-21 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-28 | 15-19 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-18 | 20-7 | 7-7 | 1-1 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-8 | 16-4 | 3-2 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-9 | 5-2 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 146, the Czech got to the qualifications after beating Iryna Shymanovich 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Fruhvirtova had a good straight sets win against Shymanovich (6-4 6-2). During the match Fruhvirtova scored 75 points vs Shymanovich’s 61. Fruhvirtova was extremely aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Fruhvirtova managed to score 2 aces and she committed only 5 double faults. Linda Fruhvirtova lost the serve 3 times and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Fruhvirtova put 54% of her first serves in, winning 68% (25/37) of the points behind her 1st serve and 44% (14/32) on the 2nd serve. Linda broke Shymanovich 6 times after converting 50% of her break points (6/12).
Fruhvirtova has a compiled 11-14 win-loss record in 2024, 5-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the French Open
Previously, her best result was reaching the 1st round in 2023. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sramkova | Fruhvirtova |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 18 |
| Pts | 69-47 | 75-61 |
| Total Points | 116 | 136 |
| Winners | 19 | 25 |
| %Winners | 28% | 33% |
Both Sramkova and Fruhvirtova played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Sramkova and Fruhvirtova have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Sramkova played 1 game less than Fruhvirtova. The Slovakian scored 19 winners (28% of the total points). On the other side, Fruhvirtova scored 25 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sramkova | Fruhvirtova |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 2 |
| 1st in | 26/46 | 37/69 |
| %1st in | 57% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 19/26 | 25/37 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 12/20 | 14/32 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 44% |
Sramkova didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Fruhvirtova recorded 2 aces . Sramkova won 73% points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Fruhvirtova won 68% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sramkova | Fruhvirtova |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 6 |
| Converted | 5/12 | 6/12 |
| % Converted | 42% | 50% |
| Conceded | 3 | 7 |
| Saved | 2 | 4 |
| % Saved | 67% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
The Slovakian broke her opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. Rebecca lost her serve once and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded. The Czech broke her opponent 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. Fruhvirtova conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 57% of the break points that she conceded.
| Sramkova | |||
| Q1 Iliev |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 69-47 | 69-47 | |
| Total points | 116 | 116 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 28% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 26/46 | 26/46 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 19/26 | 19/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/20 | 12/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Fruhvirtova | |||
| Q1 Shymanovich |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 75-61 | 75-61 | |
| Total points | 136 | 136 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 37/69 | 37/69 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 25/37 | 25/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/32 | 14/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/12 | 6/12 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLWWWWLLW
LWLLLLLLLL Tennis Scores – French Open
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Bernardo SaraivaSaraiva (6-2 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jonathan MridhaMridha – Artem DubrivnyyDubrivnyy (6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Markus ErikssonEriksson – Walter TrusendiTrusendi (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (7-5 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Bruno Sant’AnnaSant’Anna (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jan SatralSatral – Andrea GuerrieriGuerrieri (6-1 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (6-4 3-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Fabrizio OrnagoOrnago (1-6 6-1 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Anna BondarBondar – Anastasia ZakharovaZakharova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalila JakupovicJakupovic – Irina Maria BaraMaria Bara (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miriam Bianca BulgaruBianca Bulgaru – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marina Bassols RiberaBassols Ribera – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katarina ZavatskaZavatska – Yulia StarodubtsewaStarodubtsewa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mai HontamaHontama – Carol ZhaoZhao (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cristina DinuDinu – Paula OrmaecheaOrmaechea (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Katarzyna KawaKawa – Gabriela Andrea KnutsonAndrea Knutson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elvina KalievaKalieva – Laura PigossiPigossi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emiliana ArangoArango – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sara ErraniErrani – Alice TubelloTubello (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse – Suzan LamensLamens (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Julia RieraRiera – Harmony TanTan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eva LysLys – Lulu SunSun (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Leolia JeanjeanJeanjean – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jule NiemeierNiemeier – Lauren DavisDavis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia TikhonovaTikhonova – Dalma GalfiGalfi (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Hailey BaptisteBaptiste – Sinja KrausKraus (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moyuka UchijimaUchijima – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Raluca Georgiana SerbanGeorgiana Serban – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olga DanilovicDanilovic – Kimberly BirrellBirrell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Timea BabosBabos – Astra SharmaSharma (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Zeynep SonmezSonmez (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lea BoskovicBoskovic – Jana FettFett (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Veronika ErjavecErjavec – Irene Burillo EscorihuelaBurillo Escorihuela (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jil TeichmannTeichmann – Sijia WeiWei (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca SramkovaSramkova – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Priscilla HonHon – Panna UdvardyUdvardy (1-0) – H2H and prediction
