Thanasi Kokkinakis and Matteo Martineau will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Bordeaux Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 10:00 am on CENTRAL COTE OUEST AGENCY. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Thanasi Kokkinakis who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Thanasi Kokkinakis is the pick to win this match.
Thanasi Kokkinakis -> 1.32
Matteo Martineau -> 3.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Thanasi Kokkinakis vs. Matteo Martineau
There is no head to head record between Thanasi Kokkinakis and Matteo Martineau since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Thanasi Kokkinakis
17 - 13win/loss
79
65
WWWWWLWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-20 | 19-12 | 11-6 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-26 | 31-18 | 8-5 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-19 | 19-12 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 33-21 | 15-11 | 18-7 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 94, Thanasi got to the 2nd round after defeating Rinky Hijikata 6-4 7-5.
In the 1st round, Kokkinakis had a good straight sets win against Hijikata (6-4 7-5). During the match, Kokkinakis scored 94 points vs Hijikata’s 80. Kokkinakis was exceptionally aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Regarding the service games, Kokkinakis fired 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Thanasi Kokkinakis lost the serve twice and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Kokkinakis put 53% of his first serves in, winning 80% (37/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (18/41) on the 2nd serve. Kokkinakis broke Hijikata 4 times after converting 31% of his break points (4/13).
Kokkinakis has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (200-129). 8-4 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Kokkinakis has an overall 52-26 match record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Sarasota Challenger where he beat Zizou Bergs in the final 6-3 1-6 6-0.
Kokkinakis has a composed 16-13 win-loss record in 2024, 8-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bordeaux Challenger
Matteo Martineau
19 - 15win/loss
190
170
LLWLLWWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 30-33 | 2-4 | 7-13 | 18-13 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 50-36 | 0-1 | 23-17 | 18-15 | 0-0 | 9-3 |
| 2022 | 36-31 | 2-1 | 23-20 | 11-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 41-26 | 4-4 | 27-15 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 4-3 | 7-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 6-3 |
Ranked no. 183 (career-high), the French player got to the 2nd round after defeating Gabriel Debru 6-4 6-3, Henri Squire 6-4 2-6 6-4 and Aleksandar Kovacevic 7-5 6-1.
In the 1st round, Matteo had a good straight sets win against Kovacevic (7-5 6-1). During the match Martineau scored 61 points vs Kovacevic’s 43. Matteo was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Martineau blasted 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Matteo Martineau was pretty efficient on serve to win 80% (28/35) of his 1st serve and 64% (9/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Martineau broke Kovacevic 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
The French player best result of the year was reaching the final in the Nottingham Challenger and the Cherbourg Challenger.
Martineau has an aggregate 19-14 win-loss record in 2024, 7-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bordeaux Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2019. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kokkinakis | Martineau |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 66 |
| Pts | 94-80 | 205-170 |
| Total Points | 174 | 375 |
| Winners | 37 | 95 |
| %Winners | 39% | 46% |
Kokkinakis played 1 match while Martineau competed in 3 matches. Martineau started his run from the qualifications while Kokkinakis had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Matteo Martineau lost 1 set while Thanasi Kokkinakis hasn’t conceded a set so far. Kokkinakis has played 5 set(s) less than Martineau (2 vs 7). Therefore, Kokkinakis played 44 games less than Martineau. Thanasi scored 37 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Martineau made 95 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kokkinakis | Martineau |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 16 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 5.3 |
| 1st in | 46/87 | 123/180 |
| %1st in | 53% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 37/46 | 95/123 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 18/41 | 31/57 |
| %2nd pts | 44% | 54% |
Kokkinakis made 7 aces . Martineau made 16 aces (5.3 per match). Kokkinakis won 80% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Martineau won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kokkinakis | Martineau |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 11 |
| Converted | 4/13 | 11/16 |
| % Converted | 31% | 69% |
| Conceded | 13 | 10 |
| Saved | 11 | 6 |
| % Saved | 85% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
Thanasi broke his opponent 4 times with a 31% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve twice and he saved 85% of the break points that he conceded. Matteo broke his opponents 11 times with a 69% conversion rate. Martineau conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kokkinakis | |||
| R1 Hijikata |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 94-80 | 94-80 | |
| Total points | 174 | 174 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 46/87 | 46/87 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 37/46 | 37/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/41 | 18/41 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/13 | 4/13 | |
| Converted % | 31% | 31% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
| Saved | 11/13 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 85% | 85% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Martineau | |||||
| Q1 Debru |
Q3 Squire |
R1 Kovacevic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | 7-5 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 28 | 19 | 66 | |
| pts | 59-50 | 85-77 | 61-43 | 205-170 | |
| Total points | 109 | 162 | 104 | 375 | |
| Winners | 28 | 39 | 28 | 95 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 46% | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 10 | 2 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 5 | 1 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 37/56 | 51/75 | 35/49 | 123/180 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 68% | 71% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 28/37 | 39/51 | 28/35 | 95/123 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | 80% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/19 | 12/24 | 9/14 | 31/57 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 50% | 64% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 4 | 11 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 3/4 | 4/6 | 11/16 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 75% | 67% | 69% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 8 | 0 | 10 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 5/8 | 0/0 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 63% | – | 113% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWLWWLW
LLWLLWWWWL Tennis Scores in Bordeaux Challenger
- Juncheng ShangShang – Hugo GastonGaston (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Quentin HalysHalys (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Daniel EvansEvans – Hugo GrenierGrenier (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Stan WawrinkaWawrinka – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Giovanni Mpetshi PerricardMpetshi Perricard – Constant LestienneLestienne (7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas (7-60 6-2) – See score progression
- Harold MayotMayot – Sumit NagalNagal (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Andy MurrayMurray – Kyrian JacquetJacquet (7-5 2-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (7-62 6-0) – See score progression
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Rinky HijikataHijikata (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas (7-6(0) 6-2) – See score progression
- Andy MurrayMurray – Kyrian JacquetJacquet (7-5 2-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (7-6(5) 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stan WawrinkaWawrinka – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Taro DanielDaniel (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel EvansEvans – Harold MayotMayot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Andy MurrayMurray (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
