Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco and Mitchell Krueger will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Tunis Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:00 am on COURT 5. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco is the pick to win this match.
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco -> 1.48
Mitchell Krueger -> 2.53
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco vs. Mitchell Krueger
There is no head to head record between Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco and Mitchell Krueger since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|
Ranked no. 222, the Bolivian got to the 2nd round after beating Stefano Travaglia 5-7 6-3 6-1.
In the 1st round against Travaglia, The Bolivian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-3 6-1). During the match, Alejandro Dellien Velasco scored 93 points vs Travaglia’s 80. Alejandro Dellien Velasco was quite aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Alejandro Dellien Velasco couldn’t to score even 1 ace during the encounter and he committed only 5 double faults. Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco lost the serve 4 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Alejandro Dellien Velasco put 66% of his first serves in, winning 63% (32/51) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (14/26) on the 2nd serve. Murkel broke Travaglia 7 times after converting 35% of his break points (7/20).
Alejandro Dellien Velasco has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 64% of his matches (158-90). 28-11 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Alejandro Dellien Velasco has an aggregate148-81 record in the last 6 years on clay.
The Bolivian’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Punta del Este and the Santa Cruz de la Sierra Challenger.
The Bolivian has an overall 28-11 win-loss record in 2024, 28-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tunis Challenger
The Bolivian has never competed in this tournament before.
Mitchell Krueger
20 - 12win/loss
147
135
LLWLLLLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 42-31 | 30-17 | 9-7 | 2-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-29 | 15-19 | 4-4 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-28 | 18-15 | 6-5 | 1-6 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-24 | 19-12 | 5-5 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-13 | 14-8 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 252, the American got to the 2nd round after beating Filip Misolic 7-63 6-4.
In the 1st round, Mitchell had a good straight sets win against Misolic (7-63 6-4). During the match Krueger scored 77 points vs Misolic’s 70. Mitchell was very aggressive to blast 33 winners.
About the serving games, Krueger struck 6 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Mitchell Krueger was pretty effective on serve to win 77% (33/43) of his 1st serve and 56% (14/25) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Mitchell broke Misolic twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
His best result of the current year was conquering the title the Indian Wells 1 Challenger where he defeated Brandon Holt in the final 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Krueger has a compiled 20-12 win-loss record in 2024, 9-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Alejandro Dellien Velasco | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 23 |
| Pts | 93-80 | 77-70 |
| Total Points | 173 | 147 |
| Winners | 32 | 33 |
| %Winners | 34% | 43% |
Both Alejandro Dellien Velasco and Krueger played 1 match. At the moment, Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco surrendered 1 set while Mitchell Krueger hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Alejandro Dellien Velasco has played 1 set more than Krueger (3 vs 2). Therefore, Alejandro Dellien Velasco played 5 games more than Krueger. Alejandro Dellien Velasco scored 32 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, The American managed to score 33 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Alejandro Dellien Velasco | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 6 |
| 1st in | 51/77 | 43/68 |
| %1st in | 66% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 32/51 | 33/43 |
| %1st pts | 63% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 14/26 | 14/25 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 56% |
Alejandro Dellien Velasco didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Krueger scored 6 aces . Alejandro Dellien Velasco won 63% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Krueger won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Alejandro Dellien Velasco | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 2 |
| Converted | 7/20 | 2/7 |
| % Converted | 35% | 29% |
| Conceded | 6 | 2 |
| Saved | 2 | 1 |
| % Saved | 33% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 |
Alejandro Dellien Velasco broke his opponent 7 times with a 35% conversion rate. Murkel conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. Mitchell broke his opponent twice with a 29% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Alejandro Dellien Velasco | |||
| R1 Travaglia |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 93-80 | 93-80 | |
| Total points | 173 | 173 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 51/77 | 51/77 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 32/51 | 32/51 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/26 | 14/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/20 | 7/20 | |
| Converted % | 35% | 35% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 2/6 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Krueger | |||
| R1 Misolic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 77-70 | 77-70 | |
| Total points | 147 | 147 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 43/68 | 43/68 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 33/43 | 33/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/25 | 14/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 2/7 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Tunis Challenger
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Benjamin BonziBonzi (5-7 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Aziz OuakaaOuakaa (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Felix GillGill (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Maxime JanvierJanvier (7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Calvin HemeryHemery (6-3 3-6 7-65) – See score progression
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Clement TaburTabur – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (7-67 6-4) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Nick HardtHardt – Alexander WeisWeis (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Filip MisolicMisolic (7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (5-7 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Menelaos EfstathiouEfstathiou (6-0 2-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Mark LajalLajal (6-3 3-6 7-67) – See score progression
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Jesper De JongDe Jong (6-3 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Nick HardtHardt – Alexander WeisWeis (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Felix GillGill (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Benjamin BonziBonzi (5-7 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Maxime JanvierJanvier (7-6(3) 6-4) – See score progression
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Aziz OuakaaOuakaa (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Clement TaburTabur – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (7-6(7) 6-4) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Calvin HemeryHemery (6-3 3-6 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Tristan LamasineLamasine (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Timofey SkatovSkatov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Nick HardtHardt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Clement TaburTabur (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Aziz DougazDougaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
