Alexander Weis and Kyle Edmund will play each other in the qualifications of the Tunis Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT CENTRAL. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kyle Edmund who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kyle Edmund is the pick to win this match.
Kyle Edmund -> 1.72
Alexander Weis -> 2.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Alexander Weis vs. Kyle Edmund
There is no head to head record between Alexander Weis and Kyle Edmund since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Alexander Weis
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-18 | 0-0 | 15-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 51-37 | 0-2 | 51-33 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 58-30 | 2-3 | 55-24 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-31 | 0-0 | 49-30 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 302, Weis got to the qualifications after beating Omar Knani 6-4 6-0.
In the qualifications, Alexander had a good straight sets win against Knani (6-4 6-0). During the match, Weis scored 58 points vs Knani’s 32. Alexander was pretty aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Talking about the service games, Weis fired 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Alexander Weis was pretty efficient on serve to win 81% (17/21) of his 1st serve and 80% (16/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Alexander was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Knani 4 times.
Weis has a winning win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 57% of his matches (306-231). 10-14 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Weis has an overall292-205 record in the last 9 years on clay.
The Italian’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Santa Margherita di Pula.
Weis has a composed 10-14 win-loss record in 2024, 10-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tunis Challenger
Kyle Edmund
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-13 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 13-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 14-16 | 1-7 | 7-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 5-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 10-10 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 440, the Brit reached the qualifications after defeating Daniel Michalski 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Kyle had a good straight sets win against Michalski (6-4 6-4). During the match Edmund scored 84 points vs Michalski’s 72. Kyle was very aggressive to blast 22 winners.
About the serving games, Edmund managed to score 4 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Kyle Edmund lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Edmund put 45% of his first serves in, winning 63% (22/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (21/42) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Michalski 5 times after converting 36% of his break points (5/14).
The Brit’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Loughborough and M25 Sunderland.
Kyle has a composed 17-10 win-loss record in 2024, 4-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tunis Challenger
Kyle has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Weis | Edmund |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 20 |
| Pts | 58-32 | 84-72 |
| Total Points | 90 | 156 |
| Winners | 17 | 22 |
| %Winners | 29% | 26% |
Both Weis and Edmund played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Weis and Edmund have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Weis played 4 games less than Edmund. The Italian scored 17 winners (29% of the total points). On the other side, Edmund scored 22 winners (26%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Weis | Edmund |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 4 |
| 1st in | 21/41 | 35/77 |
| %1st in | 51% | 45% |
| 1st pts | 17/21 | 22/35 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 16/20 | 21/42 |
| %2nd pts | 80% | 50% |
Weis made 3 aces . Edmund scored 4 aces . Weis won 81% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 80% of the points. On the other side, Edmund won 63% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Weis | Edmund |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/4 | 5/14 |
| % Converted | 100% | 36% |
| Conceded | 3 | 6 |
| Saved | 3 | 3 |
| % Saved | 100% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
The Italian broke his opponent 4 times with a 100% conversion rate. Weis very solid his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points. The Brit broke his opponent 5 times with a 36% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Weis | |||
| Q1 Knani |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 58-32 | 58-32 | |
| Total points | 90 | 90 | |
| Winners | 17 | 17 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 21/41 | 21/41 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 17/21 | 17/21 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/20 | 16/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 80% | 80% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/4 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Edmund | |||
| Q1 Michalski |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 84-72 | 84-72 | |
| Total points | 156 | 156 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 26% | 26% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 35/77 | 35/77 | |
| % 1st in | 45% | 45% | |
| 1st pts | 22/35 | 22/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/42 | 21/42 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/14 | 5/14 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWLLWWLWW
LLWWLWLWLL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Filip MisolicMisolic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Aziz DougazDougaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – Titouan DroguetDroguet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander WeisWeis – Kyle EdmundEdmund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Menelaos EfstathiouEfstathiou – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aziz OuakaaOuakaa – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Max HoukesHoukes (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Valentin RoyerRoyer (0-1) – H2H and prediction
