Ryan Nijboer and Federico Arnaboldi will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Francavilla Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 3:00 pm on Center Court. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ryan Nijboer who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ryan Nijboer is the pick to win this match.
Ryan Nijboer -> 1.42
Federico Arnaboldi -> 2.73
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ryan Nijboer vs. Federico Arnaboldi
There is no head to head record between Ryan Nijboer and Federico Arnaboldi since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Ryan Nijboer
18 - 12win/loss
389
371
LLLWLWWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 49-36 | 8-3 | 41-30 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 55-32 | 12-9 | 41-21 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-23 | 1-6 | 22-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-28 | 9-13 | 18-13 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 21-17 | 13-7 | 5-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 3-2 |
Ranked no. 463, Ryan reached the 2nd round after defeating Laurent Lokoli 6-2 6-3, Gabriel Debru 6-3 1-6 7-60 and Shintaro Mochizuki 6-4 7-5.
In the 1st round, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Mochizuki (6-4 7-5). During the match, Nijboer scored 73 points vs Mochizuki’s 66. Ryan was exceptionally aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Regarding the service games, Nijboer couldn’t to score even 1 ace in the encounter and he committed only 3 double faults. Ryan Nijboer lost the serve 4 times. Furthermore, Nijboer put 51% of his first serves in, winning 51% (19/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 57% (20/35) on the 2nd serve. Ryan broke Mochizuki 6 times after converting 60% of his break points (6/10).
Nijboer has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 57% of his matches (217-164). 10-6 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Nijboer has a composed120-87 record in the last 8 years on clay.
The Dutch’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Manacor.
Ryan has an overall 18-12 win-loss record in 2024, 10-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Francavilla Challenger
The Dutch has never competed in this tournament before.
Federico Arnaboldi
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 42-27 | 0-1 | 40-23 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-29 | 1-2 | 23-21 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-24 | 0-2 | 23-19 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 60-15 | 12-2 | 48-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-12 | 10-5 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 621, Arnaboldi got to the 2nd round after defeating Federico Campana 6-4 6-2, Elmer Moller 7-65 3-6 6-3 and Lorenzo Carboni 2-6 6-1 4-1 ret..
In the 1st round against Carboni, the Italian had a free pass after Carboni retired on a 2-6 6-1 4-1 . scoreline.
Federico’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Opatija.
Federico has a compiled 14-8 win-loss record in 2024, 14-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nijboer | Arnaboldi |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 68 | 69 |
| Pts | 222-208 | 246-214 |
| Total Points | 430 | 460 |
| Winners | 73 | 84 |
| %Winners | 33% | 34% |
Both Nijboer and Arnaboldi played 3 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Ryan Nijboer surrendered 1 set, while Federico Arnaboldi conceded 2 sets. Nijboer has played 2 set(s) less than Arnaboldi (7 vs 9). Therefore, Nijboer played 1 game less than Arnaboldi. Nijboer scored 73 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Arnaboldi scored 84 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nijboer | Arnaboldi |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 1.7 | 3.3 |
| 1st in | 113/213 | 117/245 |
| %1st in | 53% | 48% |
| 1st pts | 73/113 | 84/117 |
| %1st pts | 65% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 52/100 | 62/128 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 48% |
Nijboer made 5 aces (1.7 per match). Arnaboldi fired 10 aces (3.3 per match). Nijboer won 65% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Arnaboldi won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nijboer | Arnaboldi |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 15 | 15 |
| Converted | 15/28 | 15/26 |
| % Converted | 54% | 58% |
| Conceded | 17 | 26 |
| Saved | 7 | 16 |
| % Saved | 41% | 62% |
| Times Broken | 10 | 10 |
Ryan broke his opponents 15 times with a 54% conversion rate. Ryan dropped his serve 10 times and he saved 41% of the break points that he conceded. Arnaboldi broke his opponents 15 times with a 58% conversion rate. The Italian conceded his serve 10 times and he saved 62% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nijboer | |||||
| Q1 Lokoli |
Q3 Debru |
R1 Mochizuki |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | 6-3 1-6 7-60 | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 29 | 22 | 68 | |
| pts | 65-49 | 84-93 | 73-66 | 222-208 | |
| Total points | 114 | 177 | 139 | 430 | |
| Winners | 20 | 34 | 19 | 73 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 40% | 26% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 9 | 3 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 24/45 | 52/96 | 37/72 | 113/213 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 54% | 51% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 20/24 | 34/52 | 19/37 | 73/113 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 65% | 51% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/21 | 18/44 | 20/35 | 52/100 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 41% | 57% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 6 | 15 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 5/9 | 6/10 | 15/28 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 56% | 60% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 12 | 4 | 17 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 6/12 | 0/4 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 6 | 4 | 10 | |
| Arnaboldi | |||||
| Q1 Campana |
Q3 Moller |
R1 Carboni |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 7-65 3-6 6-3 | 2-6 6-1 4-1 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 31 | 20 | 69 | |
| pts | 68-51 | 107-104 | 71-59 | 246-214 | |
| Total points | 119 | 211 | 130 | 460 | |
| Winners | 24 | 33 | 27 | 84 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 31% | 38% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 5 | 2 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 10 | 5 | 20 | |
| 1st in | 33/64 | 45/108 | 39/73 | 117/245 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 42% | 53% | 48% | |
| 1st pts | 24/33 | 33/45 | 27/39 | 84/117 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | 69% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/31 | 31/63 | 16/34 | 62/128 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 49% | 47% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 5 | 15 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/14 | 5/5 | 15/26 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 36% | 100% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 10 | 9 | 26 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5/10 | 6/9 | 16 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 50% | 67% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 5 | 3 | 10 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLWWWLW
LWLLWLLLWL Tennis Scores in Francavilla Challenger
- Andrea GuerrieriGuerrieri – Billy HarrisHarris (4-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Daniel RinconRincon (7-63 1-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Nick HardtHardt – Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle (7-61 6-2) – See score progression
- Ryan NijboerNijboer – Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Elmer MollerMoller – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Lorenzo CarboniCarboni (2-6 6-1 4-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Gastao EliasElias – Gianluca MagerMager (3-6 7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Damien WengerWenger (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – Darwin BlanchBlanch (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Alexander WeisWeis (6-1 7-62) – See score progression
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini – Ivan GakhovGakhov (7-67 1-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco (6-4 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Jules MarieMarie (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Andrea GuerrieriGuerrieri – Billy HarrisHarris (4-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Damien WengerWenger (6-4 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Ryan NijboerNijboer – Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Lorenzo CarboniCarboni (2-6 6-1 4-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Nick HardtHardt – Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle (7-6(1) 6-2) – See score progression
- Gastao EliasElias – Gianluca MagerMager (3-6 7-6(5) 6-2) – See score progression
- Elmer MollerMoller – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Daniel RinconRincon (7-6(3) 1-6 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gastao EliasElias – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan NijboerNijboer – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Andrea GuerrieriGuerrieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
