Otto Virtanen and Max Hans Rehberg will face off in the 2nd round of the Mauthausen Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 3:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Otto Virtanen who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Otto Virtanen is the pick to win this match.
Otto Virtanen -> 1.39
Max Hans Rehberg -> 2.84
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Otto Virtanen vs. Max Hans Rehberg
This will be the 2nd time that Otto Virtanen and Max Hans Rehberg face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Virtanen (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on clay.
The last time that they competed against each other, Virtanen won 7-5 6-2 in the 1st round in the Ismaning Challenger back in 2021.
Otto Virtanen
20 - 9win/loss
156
109
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 22-13 | 3-7 | 3-5 | 16-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 33-31 | 4-6 | 4-10 | 22-11 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 46-31 | 4-1 | 7-12 | 25-13 | 8-3 | 2-2 |
2021 | 40-21 | 2-2 | 16-11 | 19-6 | 0-0 | 3-2 |
2020 | 24-9 | 2-2 | 1-2 | 21-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 158, Otto reached the 2nd round after defeating Sebastian Fanselow 6-2 7-5.
In the 1st round, The Finn had a good straight sets win against Fanselow (6-2 7-5). During the match, Virtanen scored 67 points vs Fanselow’s 51. Virtanen was extremely aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Virtanen fired 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Otto Virtanen lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Virtanen put 52% of his first serves in, winning 69% (22/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 60% (18/30) on the 2nd serve. The Finn broke Fanselow 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Virtanen has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 61% of his matches (182-117). 1-1 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Virtanen has a composed40-43 match record in the last 8 years on clay.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Pau Challenger where he defeated Leandro Riedi in the final 7-5 7-5 and the Lugano Challenger where he overcame Daniel Masur in the final 6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(3).
Otto has a compiled 20-9 win-loss record in 2024, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Mauthausen Challenger
Virtanen has never competed in this tournament before.
Max Hans Rehberg
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 19-10 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 5-2 |
2023 | 18-24 | 0-0 | 11-15 | 4-5 | 0-1 | 3-3 |
2022 | 33-23 | 4-4 | 14-12 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 9-1 |
2021 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 1-3 |
2020 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
Ranked no. 479, Hans reached the 2nd round after defeating Evan Furness 7-66 6-2, Sebastian Fanselow 6-3 6-4 and Sebastian Sorger 6-1 6-2.
In the 1st round, Max had a good straight sets win against Sorger (6-1 6-2). During the match Hans scored 55 points vs Sorger’s 33. Max was quite aggressive to blast 22 winners.
About the serving games, Hans scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Max Hans Rehberg was quite effective on serve to win 73% (22/30) of his 1st serve and 65% (11/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Max broke Sorger 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Hans’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Oberhaching.
Max has a compiled 18-9 win-loss record in 2024, 4-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Mauthausen Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Virtanen | Hans |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
Tot Games | 20 | 55 |
Pts | 67-51 | 200-141 |
Total Points | 118 | 341 |
Winners | 22 | 75 |
%Winners | 33% | 38% |
Virtanen played 1 match while Hans competed in 3 matches. Hans started his run from the qualifications while Virtanen had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Virtanen has played 4 set(s) less than Hans (2 vs 6). Therefore, Virtanen played 35 games less than Hans. Virtanen scored 22 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Hans struck 75 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Virtanen | Hans |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 4 |
Avg per match | 2 | 1.3 |
1st in | 32/62 | 111/166 |
%1st in | 52% | 67% |
1st pts | 22/32 | 75/111 |
%1st pts | 69% | 68% |
2nd pts | 18/30 | 37/55 |
%2nd pts | 60% | 67% |
Virtanen fired 2 aces . Hans fired 4 aces (1.3 per match). Virtanen won 69% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Hans won 68% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Virtanen | Hans |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 13 |
Converted | 5/7 | 13/22 |
% Converted | 71% | 59% |
Conceded | 6 | 12 |
Saved | 4 | 8 |
% Saved | 67% | 67% |
Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
The Finn broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Virtanen lost his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The German broke his opponents 13 times with a 59% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Virtanen | |||
R1 Fanselow |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 67-51 | 67-51 | |
Total points | 118 | 118 | |
Winners | 22 | 22 | |
%Winners | 33% | 33% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 32/62 | 32/62 | |
% 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
1st pts | 22/32 | 22/32 | |
% 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
2nd pts | 18/30 | 18/30 | |
% 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Hans | |||||
Q1 Furness |
Q3 Fanselow |
R1 Sorger |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-66 6-2 | 6-3 6-4 | 6-1 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 19 | 15 | 55 | |
pts | 80-65 | 65-43 | 55-33 | 200-141 | |
Total points | 145 | 108 | 88 | 341 | |
Winners | 25 | 28 | 22 | 75 | |
%Winners | 31% | 43% | 40% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
1st in | 44/73 | 37/46 | 30/47 | 111/166 | |
% 1st in | 60% | 80% | 64% | 67% | |
1st pts | 25/44 | 28/37 | 22/30 | 75/111 | |
% 1st pts | 57% | 76% | 73% | 68% | |
2nd pts | 19/29 | 7/9 | 11/17 | 37/55 | |
% 2nd pts | 66% | 78% | 65% | 67% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 5 | 4 | 4 | 13 | |
Converted | 5/7 | 4/10 | 4/5 | 13/22 | |
Converted % | 71% | 40% | 80% | 59% | |
Conceded | 9 | 3 | 0 | 12 | |
Saved | 6/9 | 2/3 | 0/0 | 8 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | – | 134% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Mauthausen Challenger
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Vilius GaubasGaubas (6-0 7-60) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Joris De LooreDe Loore (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Gustavo HeideHeide – Arthur GeaGea (6-3 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Lukas NeumayerNeumayer – Gabriel DialloDiallo (4-6 7-5 4-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Joel SchwaerzlerSchwaerzler – Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz (7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Lucas PouillePouille – Dennis NovakNovak (6-3 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Gerald MelzerMelzer – Jerome KymKym (6-2 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Max Hans RehbergHans Rehberg – Sebastian SorgerSorger (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Benjamin HassanHassan (6-2 2-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Sandro KoppKopp (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (6-2 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – Matteo MartineauMartineau (6-3 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (5-7 6-1 2-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Joris De LooreDe Loore (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Max Hans RehbergHans Rehberg – Sebastian SorgerSorger (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Lucas PouillePouille – Dennis NovakNovak (6-3 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Joel SchwaerzlerSchwaerzler – Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz (7-6(1) 6-4) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Lukas NeumayerNeumayer – Gabriel DialloDiallo (4-6 7-5 4-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Vilius GaubasGaubas (6-0 7-6(0)) – See score progression
- Gustavo HeideHeide – Arthur GeaGea (6-3 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Gerald MelzerMelzer – Jerome KymKym (6-2 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga – Elias YmerYmer (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gerald MelzerMelzer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas PouillePouille – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Ugo BlanchetBlanchet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (0-2) – H2H and prediction