Jerome Kym and Gerald Melzer will play each other in the 1st round of the Mauthausen Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 5:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jerome Kym who should win in 3 sets.
Jerome Kym -> 1.71
Gerald Melzer -> 2.06
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jerome Kym vs. Gerald Melzer
There is no head to head record between Jerome Kym and Gerald Melzer since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Jerome Kym
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 59-20 | 14-4 | 37-11 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 23-9 | 0-0 | 18-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
2022 | 41-22 | 17-5 | 12-9 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 3-3 |
2021 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
2020 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 478, Kym reached the 1st round after defeating Lukas Pokorny 7-63 4-6 6-2 and Matej Dodig 6-3 7-5.
In the qualifications, Jerome had a good straight sets win against Dodig (6-3 7-5). During the match, Kym scored 76 points vs Dodig’s 51. Kym was quite aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Regarding the service games, Kym fired 10 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Jerome Kym was pretty effective on serve to win 89% (34/38) of his 1st serve and 73% (11/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Kym broke Dodig twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Jerome started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has lost 1 set in this tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Kym has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 66% of his matches (90-46). 10-2 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Kym has an aggregate44-25 record in the last 6 years on clay.
Jerome’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Manacor and M15 Antalya.
Kym has a composed 18-5 win-loss record in 2024, 10-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Mauthausen Challenger
Gerald Melzer
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 16-12 | 0-0 | 16-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 20-13 | 0-0 | 20-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 13-18 | 0-1 | 13-16 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 24-14 | 0-0 | 24-13 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 497, the Austrian reached the 1st round after beating Neil Oberleitner 7-5 7-5 and Louis Wessels 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, Gerald had a good straight sets win against Wessels (6-4 6-3). During the match Melzer scored 66 points vs Wessels’s 48. The Austrian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 23 winners.
About the serving games, Melzer made 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Gerald Melzer was quite efficient on serve to win 82% (23/28) of his 1st serve and 58% (14/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Austrian broke Wessels 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Gerald started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t conceded yet a set in this event to win 54% of the points he played.
The Austrian has an overall 11-6 win-loss record in 2024, 11-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Mauthausen Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2022 and 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Kym | Melzer |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 5 | 4 |
Tot Games | 52 | 43 |
Pts | 188-149 | 141-118 |
Total Points | 337 | 259 |
Winners | 76 | 58 |
%Winners | 40% | 41% |
Both Kym and Melzer played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Jerome Kym conceded 1 set while Gerald Melzer hasn’t conceded a set so far. Kym has played 1 set more than Melzer (5 vs 4). Therefore, Kym played 9 games more than Melzer. The Swiss scored 76 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Gerald blasted 58 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Kym | Melzer |
---|---|---|
Aces | 18 | 8 |
Avg per match | 9 | 4 |
1st in | 93/139 | 81/133 |
%1st in | 67% | 61% |
1st pts | 76/93 | 58/81 |
%1st pts | 82% | 72% |
2nd pts | 30/46 | 29/52 |
%2nd pts | 65% | 56% |
Kym fired 18 aces (9 per match). Melzer fired 8 aces (4 per match). Kym won 82% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Melzer won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Kym | Melzer |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 8 |
Converted | 5/22 | 8/13 |
% Converted | 23% | 62% |
Conceded | 5 | 13 |
Saved | 3 | 10 |
% Saved | 60% | 77% |
Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
Jerome broke his opponents 5 times with a 23% conversion rate. The Swiss conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. Melzer broke his opponents 8 times with a 62% conversion rate. Melzer conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 77% of the break points that he conceded.
Kym | ||||
Q1 Pokorny | Q3 Dodig | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-63 4-6 6-2 | 6-3 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 31 | 21 | 52 | |
pts | 112-98 | 76-51 | 188-149 | |
Total points | 210 | 127 | 337 | |
Winners | 42 | 34 | 76 | |
%Winners | 38% | 45% | 40% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 8 | 10 | 18 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
1st in | 55/86 | 38/53 | 93/139 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 72% | 67% | |
1st pts | 42/55 | 34/38 | 76/93 | |
% 1st pts | 76% | 89% | 82% | |
2nd pts | 19/31 | 11/15 | 30/46 | |
% 2nd pts | 61% | 73% | 65% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Converted | 3/15 | 2/7 | 5/22 | |
Converted % | 20% | 29% | 23% | |
Conceded | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Saved | 1/3 | 2/2 | 3 | |
Saved % | 33% | 100% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Melzer | ||||
Q1 Oberleitner | Q3 Wessels | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 7-5 | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 24 | 19 | 43 | |
pts | 75-70 | 66-48 | 141-118 | |
Total points | 145 | 114 | 259 | |
Winners | 35 | 23 | 58 | |
%Winners | 47% | 35% | 41% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 6 | 2 | 8 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
1st in | 53/81 | 28/52 | 81/133 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 54% | 61% | |
1st pts | 35/53 | 23/28 | 58/81 | |
% 1st pts | 66% | 82% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 15/28 | 14/24 | 29/52 | |
% 2nd pts | 54% | 58% | 56% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
Converted | 4/6 | 4/7 | 8/13 | |
Converted % | 67% | 57% | 62% | |
Conceded | 10 | 3 | 13 | |
Saved | 8/10 | 2/3 | 10 | |
Saved % | 80% | 67% | 74% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Tennis Scores in Mauthausen Challenger
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (5-7 6-1 2-1 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – Matteo MartineauMartineau (6-3 4-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Sandro KoppKopp (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (6-2 3-6 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Benjamin HassanHassan (6-2 2-0 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas PouillePouille – Dennis NovakNovak (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Ugo BlanchetBlanchet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Joris De LooreDe Loore (0-0) – H2H and prediction