Botic Van De Zandschulp and Facundo Bagnis will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Internazionali BNL d’Italia for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 2:30 pm on COURT 12. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Botic Van De Zandschulp is the pick to win this match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.65
Facundo Bagnis -> 2.15
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Facundo Bagnis
This will be the 2nd time that Botic Van De Zandschulp and Facundo Bagnis face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Van De Zandschulp (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.
The last time that they squared off, Van De Zandschulp won 3-6 6-0 6-2 6-2 in the 3rd round in at the U.S. Open back in 2021.
Highlights Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Facundo Bagnis – U.S. Open 03-September-2021
Botic Van De Zandschulp
10 - 14win/loss
80
22
LWWLLWWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-33 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 1-2 | 6-6 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
Ranked no. 112, the Dutch reached the qualifications after defeating Zachary Svajda 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, Van De Zandschulp had a good straight sets win against Svajda (6-2 6-2). During the match, Van De Zandschulp scored 63 points vs Svajda’s 48. The Dutch was very aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about the service games, Van De Zandschulp made 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp was quite effective on serve to win 74% (28/38) of his 1st serve and 55% (12/22) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Dutch broke Svajda 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Van De Zandschulp has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (322-188). 4-5 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Van De Zandschulp has an aggregate 148-87 match record in the last years on clay.
Botic has a compiled 9-14 win-loss record in 2024, 4-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Rome
Facundo Bagnis
26 - 11win/loss
144
55
LLWWLLWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 30-15 | 1-3 | 29-11 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-27 | 4-6 | 23-20 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-29 | 9-9 | 37-19 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 38-23 | 2-5 | 35-16 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 25-14 | 1-2 | 24-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 119, Bagnis reached the qualifications after beating Thiago Agustin Tirante 7-68 7-65.
In the qualifications, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Agustin Tirante (7-68 7-65). During the match Bagnis scored 90 points vs Agustin Tirante’s 87. The Argentine was pretty aggressive to blast 43 winners.
About the serving games, Bagnis scored 8 aces and he was extremely solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Facundo Bagnis lost the serve twice and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Bagnis put 64% of his first serves in, winning 70% (43/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (20/34) on the 2nd serve. The Argentine was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Agustin Tirante twice.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Tigre Challenger where he beat Mariano Navone in the final 7-5 1-6 7-5.
Bagnis has a composed 26-10 win-loss record in 2024, 25-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Rome
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2020. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van De Zandschulp | Bagnis |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 26 |
| Pts | 63-48 | 90-87 |
| Total Points | 111 | 177 |
| Winners | 28 | 43 |
| %Winners | 44% | 48% |
Both Van De Zandschulp and Bagnis played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Van De Zandschulp and Bagnis have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Van De Zandschulp played 10 games less than Bagnis. Van De Zandschulp scored 28 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Facundo bagged 43 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Bagnis |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 8 |
| 1st in | 38/60 | 61/95 |
| %1st in | 63% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 28/38 | 43/61 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 12/22 | 20/34 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 59% |
Van De Zandschulp scored 5 aces . Bagnis scored 8 aces . Van De Zandschulp won 74% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Bagnis won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Bagnis |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 2 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 2/2 |
| % Converted | 67% | 100% |
| Conceded | 4 | 10 |
| Saved | 4 | 8 |
| % Saved | 100% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The Dutch broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Dutch was rock solid on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 4 break points. Bagnis broke his opponent twice with a 100% conversion rate. Facundo conceded his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Van De Zandschulp | |||
| Q1 Svajda |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 63-48 | 63-48 | |
| Total points | 111 | 111 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 38/60 | 38/60 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 28/38 | 28/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/22 | 12/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Bagnis | |||
| Q1 Agustin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-68 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 90-87 | 90-87 | |
| Total points | 177 | 177 | |
| Winners | 43 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 61/95 | 61/95 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 43/61 | 43/61 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/34 | 20/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/2 | 2/2 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 8/10 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLWWWLL
LLWWLLWWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Diego Sebastian SchwartzmanSebastian Schwartzman (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel EvansEvans – Fabio FogniniFognini (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Alexandre MullerMuller (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Lorenzo SonegoSonego (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Pedro CachinCachin (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Aslan KaratsevKaratsev (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano – Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Richard GasquetGasquet (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Sebastian OfnerOfner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Andrea VavassoriVavassori (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Marcos GironGiron (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Zizou BergsBergs – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pavel KotovKotov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Jesper De JongDe Jong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jack DraperDraper – Borna CoricCoric (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Harold MayotMayot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
