Brandon Nakashima and Jesper De Jong will square off in the qualifications of the Internazionali BNL d’Italia for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 3:00 pm on GRAND STAND ARENA. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Brandon Nakashima who should win in 2 sets.
Brandon Nakashima -> 1.33
Jesper De Jong -> 3.14
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Brandon Nakashima vs. Jesper De Jong
There is no head to head record between Brandon Nakashima and Jesper De Jong since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Brandon Nakashima
32 - 12win/loss
72
43
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 34-14 | 11-4 | 12-6 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 21-26 | 9-15 | 3-4 | 8-3 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 41-26 | 17-13 | 5-5 | 9-4 | 10-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 45-25 | 17-10 | 4-7 | 20-5 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 28-14 | 19-6 | 4-4 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 72, the American got to the qualifications after beating Nerman Fatic 7-65 7-5.
In the qualifications, Brandon had a good straight sets win against Fatic (7-65 7-5). During the match, Nakashima scored 84 points vs Fatic’s 76. Nakashima was very aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Nakashima managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Brandon Nakashima was very efficient on serve to win 82% (32/39) of his 1st serve and 63% (22/35) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Brandon broke Fatic once after converting 17% of his break points (1/6).
Nakashima has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 62% of his matches (196-120). 9-4 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Nakashima has an overall25-24 record in the last 9 years on clay.
His best result of the current year was conquering the title the Tenerife 1 Challenger where he overcame Pedro Martinez Portero in the final 6-3 6-4.
Brandon has a compiled 31-12 win-loss record in 2024, 9-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Rome
Jesper De Jong
17 - 12win/loss
162
135
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 17-13 | 7-3 | 10-8 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 52-23 | 19-4 | 30-14 | 0-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 24-28 | 12-7 | 10-13 | 2-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 32-29 | 2-6 | 27-18 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 31-12 | 7-3 | 14-5 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 162, Jesper reached the qualifications after defeating Jurij Rodionov 6-3 2-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, Jesper defeated Rodionov (6-3 2-6 6-4). During the match De scored 99 points vs Rodionov’s 97. The Dutch was pretty aggressive to blast 35 winners.
About the serving games, De recorded 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Jesper De Jong lost the serve 4 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, De put 54% of his first serves in, winning 60% (35/58) of the points behind his 1st serve and 51% (25/49) on the 2nd serve. Jesper broke Rodionov 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
De has an aggregate 17-11 win-loss record in 2024, 10-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Rome
Jesper has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Nakashima | De |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 25 | 27 |
Pts | 84-76 | 99-97 |
Total Points | 160 | 196 |
Winners | 32 | 35 |
%Winners | 38% | 35% |
Both Nakashima and De played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Jesper De Jong dropped 1 set while Brandon Nakashima hasn’t conceded a set so far. Nakashima has played 1 set(s) less than De (2 vs 3). Therefore, Nakashima played 2 games less than De. Nakashima scored 32 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The Dutch managed to score 35 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Nakashima | De |
---|---|---|
Aces | 3 | 5 |
Avg per match | 3 | 5 |
1st in | 39/74 | 58/107 |
%1st in | 53% | 54% |
1st pts | 32/39 | 35/58 |
%1st pts | 82% | 60% |
2nd pts | 22/35 | 25/49 |
%2nd pts | 63% | 51% |
Nakashima managed to score 3 aces . De fired 5 aces . Nakashima won 82% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, De won 60% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Nakashima | De |
---|---|---|
Won | 1 | 4 |
Converted | 1/6 | 4/12 |
% Converted | 17% | 33% |
Conceded | 0 | 12 |
Saved | 0 | 8 |
% Saved | 0% | 67% |
Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
The American broke his opponent once with a 17% conversion rate. The American was rock solid on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Dutch broke his opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Nakashima | |||
Q1 Fatic | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-65 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
pts | 84-76 | 84-76 | |
Total points | 160 | 160 | |
Winners | 32 | 32 | |
%Winners | 38% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 39/74 | 39/74 | |
% 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
1st pts | 32/39 | 32/39 | |
% 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
2nd pts | 22/35 | 22/35 | |
% 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 1 | 1 | |
Converted | 1/6 | 1/6 | |
Converted % | 17% | 17% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
De | |||
Q1 Rodionov | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
pts | 99-97 | 99-97 | |
Total points | 196 | 196 | |
Winners | 35 | 35 | |
%Winners | 35% | 35% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 58/107 | 58/107 | |
% 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
1st pts | 35/58 | 35/58 | |
% 1st pts | 60% | 60% | |
2nd pts | 25/49 | 25/49 | |
% 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
Saved | 8/12 | 8 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Diego Sebastian SchwartzmanSebastian Schwartzman (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel EvansEvans – Fabio FogniniFognini (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Alexandre MullerMuller (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Lorenzo SonegoSonego (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Pedro CachinCachin (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Aslan KaratsevKaratsev (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano – Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Richard GasquetGasquet (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Sebastian OfnerOfner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Andrea VavassoriVavassori (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Marcos GironGiron (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Zizou BergsBergs – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pavel KotovKotov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Jesper De JongDe Jong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jack DraperDraper – Borna CoricCoric (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Harold MayotMayot (0-0) – H2H and prediction