Elmer Moller and Federico Arnaboldi will play each other in the qualifications of the Francavilla Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 11:00 am on GRANDSTAND. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Elmer Moller who should win in 2 sets.
Elmer Moller -> 1.29
Federico Arnaboldi -> 3.38
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Elmer Moller vs. Federico Arnaboldi
There is no head to head record between Elmer Moller and Federico Arnaboldi since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Elmer Moller
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 62-26 | 5-3 | 52-21 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 48-21 | 14-11 | 31-8 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 26-15 | 10-5 | 12-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 13-9 | 8-4 | 2-4 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 310 (career-high), Moller got to the qualifications after defeating Francesco Ferrari 6-3 6-1
.In the qualifications, The Dane had a good straight sets win against Ferrari (6-3 6-1). During the match, Moller scored 58 points vs Ferrari’s 34. The Dane was extremely aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Regarding the service games, Moller wasn’t able to score even 1 ace during the match and he committed only 2 double faults. Elmer Moller lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Moller put 65% of his first serves in, winning 61% (17/28) of the points behind his 1st serve and 73% (11/15) on the 2nd serve. Elmer broke Ferrari 6 times after converting 86% of his break points (6/7).
Moller has a solid match record in the last 5 years having won 67% of his matches (108-52). 14-3 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Moller has a compiled59-22 match record in the last 5 years on clay.
The Dane’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Santa Margherita di Pula.
The Dane has an overall 21-7 win-loss record in 2024, 14-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Francavilla Challenger
Moller has never competed in this tournament before.
Federico Arnaboldi
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 42-27 | 0-1 | 40-23 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 27-29 | 1-2 | 23-21 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 23-24 | 0-2 | 23-19 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 60-15 | 12-2 | 48-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 13-12 | 10-5 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 619, Arnaboldi got to the qualifications after defeating Federico Campana 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Arnaboldi had a good straight sets win against Campana (6-4 6-2). During the match Arnaboldi scored 68 points vs Campana’s 51. The Italian was extremely aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about serving, Arnaboldi recorded 3 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Federico Arnaboldi lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Arnaboldi put 52% of his first serves in, winning 73% (24/33) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (15/31) on the 2nd serve. Arnaboldi broke Campana 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
The Italian’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Opatija.
The Italian has a compiled 12-8 win-loss record in 2024, 12-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Moller | Arnaboldi |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 16 | 18 |
Pts | 58-34 | 68-51 |
Total Points | 92 | 119 |
Winners | 17 | 24 |
%Winners | 29% | 35% |
Both Moller and Arnaboldi played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Moller and Arnaboldi have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Moller played 2 games less than Arnaboldi. Elmer scored 17 winners (29% of the total points). On the other side, Arnaboldi bagged 24 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Moller | Arnaboldi |
---|---|---|
Aces | 0 | 3 |
Avg per match | 0 | 3 |
1st in | 28/43 | 33/64 |
%1st in | 65% | 52% |
1st pts | 17/28 | 24/33 |
%1st pts | 61% | 73% |
2nd pts | 11/15 | 15/31 |
%2nd pts | 73% | 48% |
Moller didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Arnaboldi fired 3 aces . Moller won 61% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 73% of the points. On the other side, Arnaboldi won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Moller | Arnaboldi |
---|---|---|
Won | 6 | 5 |
Converted | 6/7 | 5/7 |
% Converted | 86% | 71% |
Conceded | 3 | 7 |
Saved | 1 | 5 |
% Saved | 33% | 71% |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Elmer broke his opponent 6 times with a 86% conversion rate. Elmer dropped his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. Federico broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Arnaboldi conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
Moller | |||
Q1 Ferrari | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | 58-34 | 58-34 | |
Total points | 92 | 92 | |
Winners | 17 | 17 | |
%Winners | 29% | 29% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 28/43 | 28/43 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
1st pts | 17/28 | 17/28 | |
% 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |
2nd pts | 11/15 | 11/15 | |
% 2nd pts | 73% | 73% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/7 | 6/7 | |
Converted % | 86% | 86% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Arnaboldi | |||
Q1 Campana | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 68-51 | 68-51 | |
Total points | 119 | 119 | |
Winners | 24 | 24 | |
%Winners | 35% | 35% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
1st in | 33/64 | 33/64 | |
% 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
1st pts | 24/33 | 24/33 | |
% 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 15/31 | 15/31 | |
% 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – Gianluca MagerMager (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Alexander WeisWeis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea GuerrieriGuerrieri – Dan AddedAdded (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova – Damien WengerWenger (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Jules MarieMarie (0-0) – H2H and prediction