James McCabe and James Kent Trotter will face off in the qualifications of the Wuxi Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:00 am on COURT 4. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is James Kent Trotter who should win in 3 sets.
James Kent Trotter -> 1.87
James McCabe -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head James McCabe vs. James Kent Trotter
This will be the 2nd time that James McCabe and James Kent Trotter clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Kent (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they fought against each other, Kent won 7-6(8) 6-2 in the quarter in the Granby Challenger back in 2023.
James McCabe
19 - 13win/loss
342
258
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-18 | 16-13 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-27 | 24-14 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-27 | 30-19 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 17-5 | 17-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 365, James reached the qualifications after beating Jose Statham 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Statham (6-2 6-4). During the match, McCabe scored 58 points vs Statham’s 44. James was very aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about the service games, McCabe fired 9 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. James McCabe was quite efficient on serve to win 87% (27/31) of his 1st serve and 57% (12/21) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. McCabe broke Statham 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
McCabe has a winning win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 59% of his matches (104-72). 15-11 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, McCabe has an aggregate86-49 match record in the last 5 years on hard.
McCabe’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Traralgon and M25 Mildura.
The Australian has an aggregate 19-13 win-loss record in 2024, 15-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Wuxi Challenger
James has never competed in this tournament before.
James Kent Trotter
11 - 10win/loss
279
272
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-12 | 11-6 | 1-3 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-13 | 15-10 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-11 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 400, James reached the qualifications after defeating Alafia Ayeni 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, Kent had a good straight sets win against Ayeni (6-1 6-3). During the match Kent scored 60 points vs Ayeni’s 37. James was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Kent fired 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. James Kent Trotter was extremely effective on serve to win 72% (23/32) of his 1st serve and 70% (14/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Japanese was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Ayeni 4 times.
The Japanese has an aggregate 11-10 win-loss record in 2024, 4-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | McCabe | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 16 |
| Pts | 58-44 | 60-37 |
| Total Points | 102 | 97 |
| Winners | 27 | 23 |
| %Winners | 47% | 38% |
Both McCabe and Kent played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, McCabe and Kent have played the same amount of sets 2. However, McCabe played 2 games more than Kent. James scored 27 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, The Japanese recorded 23 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | McCabe | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 2 |
| 1st in | 31/52 | 32/52 |
| %1st in | 60% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 27/31 | 23/32 |
| %1st pts | 87% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 12/21 | 14/20 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 70% |
McCabe blasted 9 aces . Kent fired 2 aces . McCabe won 87% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Kent won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 70% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | McCabe | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/6 | 4/4 |
| % Converted | 50% | 100% |
| Conceded | 1 | 0 |
| Saved | 1 | 0 |
| % Saved | 100% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
James broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. James very solid his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 1 break points. James broke his opponent 4 times with a 100% conversion rate. Kent was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| McCabe | |||
| Q1 Statham | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 58-44 | 58-44 | |
| Total points | 102 | 102 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 31/52 | 31/52 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 27/31 | 27/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 87% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/21 | 12/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Kent | |||
| Q1 Ayeni | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 60-37 | 60-37 | |
| Total points | 97 | 97 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 32/52 | 32/52 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 23/32 | 23/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/20 | 14/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 70% | 70% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/4 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Richard BerankisBerankis – Jie CuiCui (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yan BaiBai – Blake EllisEllis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Rigele TeTe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alex BoltBolt – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi – Fajing SunSun (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mikalai HaliakHaliak – Remy BertolaBertola (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ye Cong MoCong Mo – Linang XiaoXiao (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – (0-0) – H2H and prediction