Lorenzo Sonego and Emilio Nava will play each other in the 2nd round of the Cagliari Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 5:00 pm on CENTRALE. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Lorenzo Sonego who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Lorenzo Sonego is the pick to win this match.
Lorenzo Sonego -> 1.35
Emilio Nava -> 3.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Lorenzo Sonego vs. Emilio Nava
There is no head to head record between Lorenzo Sonego and Emilio Nava since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Lorenzo Sonego
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 27-33 | 10-14 | 10-11 | 4-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-31 | 10-12 | 9-7 | 9-8 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-29 | 7-9 | 8-11 | 10-5 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-24 | 9-11 | 9-4 | 6-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-15 | 0-5 | 7-7 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 52, Lorenzo got to the 2nd round after beating Alex Michelsen 6-3 2-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, Sonego defeated Michelsen (6-3 2-6 6-3). During the match, Sonego scored 85 points vs Michelsen’s 76. The Italian was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Sonego blasted 6 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Lorenzo Sonego lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Sonego put 62% of his first serves in, winning 61% (31/51) of the points behind his 1st serve and 61% (19/31) on the 2nd serve. Lorenzo broke Michelsen 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Sonego has good match record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (315-247). 5-5 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Sonego has an aggregate 163-108 record in the last years on clay.
Lorenzo has an aggregate 9-14 win-loss record in 2024, 5-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cagliari Challenger
Sonego has never competed in this tournament before.
Emilio Nava
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-34 | 16-15 | 8-9 | 8-5 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 10-7 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 127, Nava reached the 2nd round after defeating Jesper De Jong 6-1 6-3.
In the 1st round, Emilio had a good straight sets win against De Jong (6-1 6-3). During the match Nava scored 65 points vs De Jong’s 38. Emilio was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
About the serving games, Nava fired 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Emilio Nava was exceptionally effective on serve to win 72% (21/29) of his 1st serve and 83% (15/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Nava broke De Jong 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
The American has an overall 17-11 win-loss record in 2024, 2-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sonego | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 26 | 16 |
| Pts | 85-76 | 65-38 |
| Total Points | 161 | 103 |
| Winners | 31 | 21 |
| %Winners | 36% | 32% |
Both Sonego and Nava played 1 match. At the moment, Lorenzo Sonego surrendered 1 set while Emilio Nava hasn’t conceded a set so far. Sonego has played 1 set more than Nava (3 vs 2). Therefore, Sonego played 10 games more than Nava. Lorenzo scored 31 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, The American fired 21 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sonego | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 4 |
| 1st in | 51/82 | 29/47 |
| %1st in | 62% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 31/51 | 21/29 |
| %1st pts | 61% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 19/31 | 15/18 |
| %2nd pts | 61% | 83% |
Sonego made 6 aces . Nava made 4 aces . Sonego won 61% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Nava won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 83% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sonego | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/10 |
| % Converted | 57% | 40% |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 |
| Saved | 2 | 5 |
| % Saved | 40% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
Sonego broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. The Italian lost his serve 3 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Emilio was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 5 break points.
| Sonego | |||
| R1 Michelsen |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 85-76 | 85-76 | |
| Total points | 161 | 161 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 51/82 | 51/82 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 31/51 | 31/51 | |
| % 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/31 | 19/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Nava | |||
| R1 De |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 65-38 | 65-38 | |
| Total points | 103 | 103 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 29/47 | 29/47 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 21/29 | 21/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/18 | 15/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 83% | 83% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLLWLL
LWLWWWLLWL Tennis Scores in Cagliari Challenger
- Federico CoriaCoria – Fabio FogniniFognini (7-64 3-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Gabriel DialloDiallo (6-0 7-64) – See score progression
- Lorenzo SonegoSonego – Alex MichelsenMichelsen (6-3 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (6-4 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Taro DanielDaniel (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Radu AlbotAlbot (2-6 7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (7-5 4-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Zsombor PirosPiros (7-65 6-0) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Jesper De JongDe Jong (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Luciano DarderiDarderi – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexander Erler/Lucas MiedlerErler/Lucas Miedler – Philipp Oswald/Fernando RomboliOswald/Fernando Romboli (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Christopher EubanksEubanks (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Federico CoriaCoria (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – Lorenzo SonegoSonego (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano NavoneNavone – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
