Omar Jasika and Yuta Shimizu will face off in the 2nd round of the Guangzhou Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 12:30 pm on COURT 6. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Yuta Shimizu who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Yuta Shimizu is the pick to win this match.
Yuta Shimizu -> 1.64
Omar Jasika -> 2.17
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Omar Jasika vs. Yuta Shimizu
This will be the 3rd time that Omar Jasika and Yuta Shimizu face off. The head to head is 2-0 for Jasika (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Jasika won 6-3 6-3 in the 2nd round in the Bloomfield Hills Challenger back in 2023.
Omar Jasika
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-12 | 17-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-26 | 34-20 | 0-2 | 0-3 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 70-23 | 63-20 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 212, Jasika reached the 2nd round after beating Jiaji Wang 6-3 6-1.
In the 1st round, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Wang (6-3 6-1). During the match, Jasika scored 63 points vs Wang’s 37. The Australian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Jasika recorded 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Omar Jasika was pretty efficient on serve to win 81% (22/27) of his 1st serve and 73% (11/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Jasika broke Wang 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Jasika has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 64% of his matches (218-121). 17-6 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Jasika has an overall 182-93 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
His best result of the season was conquering the title the Burnie 1 Challenger where he defeated Alex Bolt in the final 6-2 6-7(2) 6-3.
Omar has a compiled 18-9 win-loss record in 2024, 17-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guangzhou Challenger
Yuta Shimizu
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11-11 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-24 | 35-23 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-23 | 36-21 | 7-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 18-12 | 12-8 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 1-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-1 | 6-1 | 0-0 | 5-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 279, the Japanese got to the 2nd round after beating Dominik Palan 6-4 6-4 and Chak Lam Coleman Wong 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, Shimizu had a good straight sets win against Lam Coleman Wong (6-3 6-2). During the match Shimizu scored 68 points vs Lam Coleman Wong’s 53. Yuta was extremely aggressive to blast 18 winners.
About the serving games, Shimizu scored 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Yuta Shimizu lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Shimizu put 66% of his first serves in, winning 51% (18/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 67% (12/18) on the 2nd serve. Shimizu broke Lam Coleman Wong 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
Shimizu’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the New Delhi Challenger and the Hamburg Challenger.
Shimizu has an aggregate 10-9 win-loss record in 2024, 6-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guangzhou Challenger
Shimizu has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jasika | Shimizu |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 37 |
| Pts | 63-37 | 136-112 |
| Total Points | 100 | 248 |
| Winners | 22 | 47 |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% |
Jasika played 1 match while Shimizu competed in 2 matches. Shimizu started his run from the qualifications while Jasika had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Jasika has played 2 set(s) less than Shimizu (2 vs 4). Therefore, Jasika played 21 games less than Shimizu. Omar scored 22 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Shimizu blasted 47 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jasika | Shimizu |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 2.5 |
| 1st in | 27/42 | 73/116 |
| %1st in | 64% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 22/27 | 47/73 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 64% |
| 2nd pts | 11/15 | 27/43 |
| %2nd pts | 73% | 63% |
Jasika blasted 4 aces . Shimizu made 5 aces (2.5 per match). Jasika won 81% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 73% of the points. On the other side, Shimizu won 64% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jasika | Shimizu |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 8 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 8/16 |
| % Converted | 50% | 50% |
| Conceded | 2 | 10 |
| Saved | 2 | 8 |
| % Saved | 100% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Jasika broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Jasika extremely effective on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points. Yuta broke his opponents 8 times with a 50% conversion rate. Shimizu conceded his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Jasika | |||
| R1 Wang |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 63-37 | 63-37 | |
| Total points | 100 | 100 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 27/42 | 27/42 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 22/27 | 22/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/15 | 11/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 73% | 73% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Shimizu | |||||
| Q1 Palan |
Q3 Bai |
R1 Lam Coleman Wong |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 6-4 6-0 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 16 | 17 | 53 | |
| pts | 68-59 | – | 68-53 | 136-112 | |
| Total points | 127 | 0 | 121 | 248 | |
| Winners | 29 | 18 | 47 | ||
| %Winners | 43% | 0% | 26% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 4 | ||
| 1st in | 38/63 | / | 35/53 | 73/116 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 0% | 66% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 29/38 | / | 18/35 | 47/73 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 0% | 51% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/25 | / | 12/18 | 27/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 0% | 67% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 6 | 8 | ||
| Converted | 2/7 | / | 6/9 | 8/16 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 0% | 67% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 7 | 10 | ||
| Saved | 3/3 | 0/ | 5/7 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 100% | – | 71% | 171% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | ||
Head 2 Head
LLLWLWLLLL
LLWWLWLLWW Tennis Scores in Guangzhou Challenger
- Adam WaltonWalton – Alex BoltBolt (7-60 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Rigele TeTe (7-5 7-63) – Stats, scores, rankings
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Ricardas BerankisBerankis (6-1 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Brandon HoltHolt – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Omar JasikaJasika (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Adam WaltonWalton (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – James DuckworthDuckworth (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
