Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Remy Bertola will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Shenzhen 1 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 3:00 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Chak Lam Coleman Wong is the pick to win this match.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.52
Remy Bertola -> 2.42
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Remy Bertola
There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Remy Bertola since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 38-34 | 36-24 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 183 (career-high), Lam Coleman Wong got to the 2nd round after beating James Kent Trotter 7-5 6-2.
In the 1st round, The had a good straight sets win against Kent Trotter (7-5 6-2). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 72 points vs Kent Trotter’s 63. The was very aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lam Coleman Wong blasted 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost the serve once and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Lam Coleman Wong put 54% of his first serves in, winning 68% (26/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 58% (19/33) on the 2nd serve. Lam Coleman Wong broke Kent Trotter 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 58% of his matches (102-73). 11-8 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Lam Coleman Wong has an aggregate81-54 record in the last 6 years on hard.
Lam Coleman Wong’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the New Delhi Challenger.
Lam Coleman Wong has an overall 11-9 win-loss record in 2024, 11-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Shenzhen 1 Challenger
The has never competed in this tournament before.
Remy Bertola
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 49-28 | 20-10 | 20-11 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-31 | 12-5 | 21-21 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 42-29 | 0-0 | 41-23 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 50-24 | 13-7 | 29-14 | 8-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 27-9 | 17-5 | 8-3 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 392, the Swiss got to the 2nd round after defeating Evgeny Donskoy 6-3 7-5, Akira Santillan 6-3 7-65 and Yuta Shimizu 7-66 6-3.
In the 1st round, Bertola had a good straight sets win against Shimizu (7-66 6-3). During the match Bertola scored 90 points vs Shimizu’s 82. Remy was very aggressive to blast 47 winners.
About the serving games, Bertola made 9 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Remy Bertola conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 12 break points. Furthermore, Bertola put 61% of his first serves in, winning 81% (47/58) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (16/37) on the 2nd serve. The Swiss broke Shimizu once after converting 20% of his break points (1/5).
The Swiss’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Reus.
The Swiss has an overall 12-7 win-loss record in 2024, 3-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Bertola |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 65 |
| Pts | 72-63 | 234-204 |
| Total Points | 135 | 438 |
| Winners | 26 | 103 |
| %Winners | 36% | 44% |
Lam Coleman Wong played 1 match while Bertola competed in 3 matches. Bertola started his run from the qualifications while Lam Coleman Wong had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Lam Coleman Wong has played 4 set(s) less than Bertola (2 vs 6). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 45 games less than Bertola. The scored 26 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, The Swiss recorded 103 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Bertola |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 21 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 7 |
| 1st in | 38/71 | 126/229 |
| %1st in | 54% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 26/38 | 103/126 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 19/33 | 54/103 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 52% |
Lam Coleman Wong struck 8 aces . Bertola bagged 21 aces (7 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 68% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Bertola won 82% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Bertola |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 6 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 6/15 |
| % Converted | 44% | 40% |
| Conceded | 10 | 23 |
| Saved | 9 | 22 |
| % Saved | 90% | 96% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Chak broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. The dropped his serve once and he saved 90% of the break points that he conceded. Remy broke his opponents 6 times with a 40% conversion rate. Bertola conceded his serve once and he saved 96% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||
| R1 Kent Trotter |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 72-63 | 72-63 | |
| Total points | 135 | 135 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 38/71 | 38/71 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 26/38 | 26/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/33 | 19/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 9/10 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 90% | 90% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Bertola | |||||
| Q1 Donskoy |
Q3 Santillan |
R1 Shimizu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-5 | 6-3 7-65 | 7-66 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 22 | 22 | 65 | |
| pts | 70-56 | 74-66 | 90-82 | 234-204 | |
| Total points | 126 | 140 | 172 | 438 | |
| Winners | 27 | 29 | 47 | 103 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | 52% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 8 | 9 | 21 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 2 | 3 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 33/67 | 35/67 | 58/95 | 126/229 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 52% | 61% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 27/33 | 29/35 | 47/58 | 103/126 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 83% | 81% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/34 | 16/32 | 16/37 | 54/103 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 50% | 43% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 3/5 | 1/5 | 6/15 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 60% | 20% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 5 | 12 | 23 | |
| Saved | 6/6 | 4/5 | 12/12 | 22 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 80% | 100% | 280% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLWWLL
LWWWWLWLWW Tennis Scores in Shenzhen 1 Challenger
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (3-6 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (2-6 6-3 7-65) – See score progression
- Remy BertolaBertola – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (7-66 6-3) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-1 6-71 6-2) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Dane SweenySweeny (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Federico CinaCina (6-4 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Yi ZhouZhou (7-5 6-74 6-3) – See score progression
- Arthur FeryFery – Ricardas BerankisBerankis (2-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (6-0 3-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Luke SavilleSaville (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Mattia BellucciBellucci – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Mark LajalLajal – Li TuTu (6-3 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Rigele TeTe (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Jules MarieMarie – Fajing SunSun (6-1 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (2-6 6-3 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Remy BertolaBertola – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (7-6(6) 6-3) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-1 6-7(1) 6-2) – See score progression
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Yi ZhouZhou (7-5 6-7(4) 6-3) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Dane SweenySweeny (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (3-6 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur FeryFery – Ricardas BerankisBerankis (2-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jules MarieMarie – (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Remy BertolaBertola – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Lloyd HarrisHarris (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Alex BoltBolt (1-0) – H2H and prediction
