Varvara Gracheva and Elizabeth Mandlik will square off in the qualifications of the Mutua Madrid Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 11:00 am on STADIUM 3. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Varvara Gracheva who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Varvara Gracheva is the pick to win this match.
Varvara Gracheva -> 1.36
Elizabeth Mandlik -> 2.98
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Varvara Gracheva vs. Elizabeth Mandlik
There is no head to head record between Varvara Gracheva and Elizabeth Mandlik since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Varvara Gracheva
10 - 11win/loss
66
39
LLWLWLWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29-28 | 13-15 | 15-10 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-30 | 23-18 | 7-6 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-32 | 7-11 | 12-14 | 10-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-31 | 11-10 | 7-10 | 9-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 10-14 | 5-7 | 4-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 91,she will start her run in Madrid after she played her last match in Madrid where she beat 6-2 6-3 to Zuleta De Reales in the qualifications on the 22nd of April.
The French player has an overall 9-11 win-loss record in 2024, 5-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
The French player won her last 5 matches.
Talking about her overall career, Gracheva has an overall 244-174 record. She has a positive 132-66 record on clay.
Previously in Madrid
Previously, her best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2022. See her history.
Elizabeth Mandlik
2 - 6win/loss
249
97
LLLWWLLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-27 | 15-14 | 3-8 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-33 | 15-17 | 19-12 | 0-1 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-24 | 26-12 | 10-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-22 | 24-13 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-8 | 3-4 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 123, Elizabeth got to the qualifications after beating Jessika Ponchet 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Ponchet (6-4 6-2). During the match Mandlik scored 63 points vs Ponchet’s 49. Mandlik was quite aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Mandlik was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 5 double faults. Elizabeth Mandlik lost the serve once and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Mandlik put 70% of her first serves in, winning 74% (29/39) of the points behind her 1st serve and 41% (7/17) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Ponchet 4 times after converting 50% of her break points (4/8).
The American has a composed 2-5 win-loss record in 2024, 2-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Madrid
Previously, her best result was reaching the qualifications in 2023. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gracheva | Mandlik |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 18 |
| Pts | 64-47 | 63-49 |
| Total Points | 111 | 112 |
| Winners | 34 | 29 |
| %Winners | 53% | 46% |
Both Gracheva and Mandlik played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Gracheva and Mandlik have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Gracheva played 1 game less than Mandlik. The French player scored 34 winners (53% of the total points). On the other side, Mandlik scored 29 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gracheva | Mandlik |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 0 |
| 1st in | 47/63 | 39/56 |
| %1st in | 75% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 34/47 | 29/39 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 6/16 | 7/17 |
| %2nd pts | 38% | 41% |
Gracheva made 1 ace . Mandlik didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Gracheva won 72% points behind her first serve. She quite strong on her second serve to win 38% of the points. On the other side, Mandlik won 74% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 41% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gracheva | Mandlik |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 57% | 50% |
| Conceded | 6 | 3 |
| Saved | 5 | 2 |
| % Saved | 83% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Varvara broke her opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Varvara lost her serve once and she saved 83% of the break points that she conceded. Elizabeth broke her opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The American conceded her serve once and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded.
| Gracheva | ||
| Total | ||
|---|---|---|
| Score | ||
| Tot Set | 0 | |
| Tot Games | 0 | |
| pts | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | |
| %Winners | 0% | |
| SERVE | ||
| Aces | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | |
| 1st in | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | 0% | |
| 1st pts | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | % | |
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | 0% | |
| Breaks | ||
| Won | 0 | |
| Converted | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | 0% | |
| Conceded | 0 | |
| Saved | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | |
| Mandlik | |||
| Q1 Ponchet |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 63-49 | 63-49 | |
| Total points | 112 | 112 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 39/56 | 39/56 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 29/39 | 29/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/17 | 7/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLWWWL
LLLWWLLWWL Tennis Scores in Madrid
- Manish SureshkumarSureshkumar – Jose StathamStatham (0-6 6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tak Khunn WangKhunn Wang – Issei OkamuraOkamura (6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Yan BaiBai – Miliaan NiestenNiesten (6-2 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Olga DanilovicDanilovic – Jule NiemeierNiemeier (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Elizabeth MandlikMandlik – Varvara GrachevaGracheva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Greetje MinnenMinnen – Emiliana ArangoArango (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaqueline CristianCristian – Daria GavrilovaGavrilova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Leyre Romero GormazRomero Gormaz – Sara ErraniErrani (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sachia VickeryVickery – Jessica Bouzas ManeiroBouzas Maneiro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernarda PeraPera – Renata ZarazuaZarazua (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maria Lourdes CarleLourdes Carle – Astra SharmaSharma (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laura SiegemundSiegemund – Carlota Martinez CirezMartinez Cirez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca SramkovaSramkova – Hailey BaptisteBaptiste (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harriet DartDart – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Xiyu WangWang – Ana BogdanBogdan (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tatjana MariaMaria – Peyton StearnsStearns (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sloane StephensStephens – Martina TrevisanTrevisan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Irina-Camelia BeguBegu – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sofia KeninKenin – Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva – Yue YuanYuan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yafan WangWang – Caroline DolehideDolehide (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Petra MarticMartic – Cristina BucsaBucsa (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nao HibinoHibino – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lauren DavisDavis – Mayar SherifSherif (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Shuai ZhangZhang – Shelby RogersRogers (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Xin Yu WangYu Wang – Viktoriya TomovaTomova (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lin ZhuZhu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magda LinetteLinette – Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto (0-1) – H2H and prediction
