Stefanos Sakellaridis and Gabriel Decamps will play each other in the qualifications of the Concepcion Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on CANCHA 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Gabriel Decamps who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Gabriel Decamps is the pick to win this match.
Gabriel Decamps -> 1.52
Stefanos Sakellaridis -> 2.39
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Stefanos Sakellaridis vs. Gabriel Decamps
There is no head to head record between Stefanos Sakellaridis and Gabriel Decamps since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Stefanos Sakellaridis
21 - 13win/loss
503
392
LWWWLWWLLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 36-25 | 31-22 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 66-52 | 35-26 | 30-23 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 66-49 | 23-13 | 38-33 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 34-36 | 5-1 | 29-35 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-14 | 0-3 | 8-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 429, the Greek reached the qualifications after defeating Ignacio Carou 6-3 4-0 ret..
In the qualifications against Carou, Sakellaridis had a free pass after Carou retired on a 6-3 4-0 . scoreline.
Sakellaridis has a winning match record in the last 6 years having won 52% of his matches (197-184). 1-0 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Sakellaridis has a composed109-121 win-loss record in the last 6 years on clay.
Sakellaridis’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Nakhon Si Thammarat and M15 Hinode.
Sakellaridis has an aggregate 20-13 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Concepcion Challenger
The Greek has never competed in this tournament before.
Gabriel Decamps
18 - 8win/loss
718
262
LWLLWWLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22-12 | 14-5 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2023 | 20-19 | 16-11 | 0-2 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-31 | 23-15 | 8-9 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 46-12 | 24-6 | 20-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 661, Decamps reached the qualifications after defeating Alejandro Bancalari 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Brazilian had a good straight sets win against Bancalari (6-3 6-2). During the match Decamps scored 61 points vs Bancalari’s 42. The Brazilian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Decamps scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 6 double faults. Overall, Gabriel Decamps was very effective on serve to win 72% (28/39) of his 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Gabriel was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Bancalari 4 times.
The Brazilian’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Nakhon Si Thammarat.
Decamps has an aggregate 18-7 win-loss record in 2024, 3-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sakellaridis | Decamps |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 13 | 17 |
| Pts | 52-31 | 61-42 |
| Total Points | 83 | 103 |
| Winners | 16 | 28 |
| %Winners | 31% | 46% |
Both Sakellaridis and Decamps played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Sakellaridis has played 1 set more than Decamps (3 vs 2). However, it’s interesting to notice that Sakellaridis played 4 games less than Decamps. Stefanos scored 16 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, Decamps managed to score 28 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sakellaridis | Decamps |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 1 |
| 1st in | 19/35 | 39/56 |
| %1st in | 54% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 16/19 | 28/39 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 13/16 | 10/17 |
| %2nd pts | 81% | 59% |
Sakellaridis scored 3 aces . Decamps scored 1 ace . Sakellaridis won 84% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 81% of the points. On the other side, Decamps won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sakellaridis | Decamps |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/7 | 4/4 |
| % Converted | 43% | 100% |
| Conceded | 0 | 4 |
| Saved | 0 | 3 |
| % Saved | 0% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Stefanos broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Stefanos had a solid display on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. Decamps broke his opponent 4 times with a 100% conversion rate. Decamps conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Sakellaridis | |||
| Q1 Carou |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 4-0 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 52-31 | 52-31 | |
| Total points | 83 | 83 | |
| Winners | 16 | 16 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 19/35 | 19/35 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 16/19 | 16/19 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/16 | 13/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 81% | 81% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Decamps | |||
| Q1 Bancalari |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 61-42 | 61-42 | |
| Total points | 103 | 103 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 39/56 | 39/56 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 28/39 | 28/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 10/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/4 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWLLW
LWLLWWLWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva – Renzo OlivoOlivo (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jose PereiraPereira – Jacob BrummBrumm (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo MenaMena – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Leonardo AboianAboian – Alexander StaterStater (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco RiberoRibero – Igor GimenezGimenez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lautaro Agustin FalabellaAgustin Falabella – Seita WatanabeWatanabe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo Joaquin RodriguezJoaquin Rodriguez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matias SotoSoto – Hernan CasanovaCasanova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco RoncadelliRoncadelli – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Guido Ivan JustoIvan Justo – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alvaro Guillen MezaGuillen Meza – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
