Casper Ruud and Jordan Thompson will face off in the 3rd round of the Barcelona Open Banc Sabadell for the 6th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 4:00 pm on PISTA RAFA NADAL. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Casper Ruud who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Casper Ruud is the pick to win this match.
Casper Ruud -> 1.2
Jordan Thompson -> 4.6
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Casper Ruud vs. Jordan Thompson
This will be the 6th time that Casper Ruud and Jordan Thompson fight against each other. The head to head is 3-2 for Thompson (see full H2H stats), but Ruud has a winning record of 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they squared off, Thompson won 6-3 7-6(4) in the final in Los cabos back in February 2024.
Highlights Jordan Thompson vs Casper Ruud – Los cabos 24-February-2024
Casper Ruud
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 51-25 | 21-9 | 24-7 | 5-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-23 | 12-12 | 22-8 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 51-22 | 18-8 | 25-7 | 7-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 57-17 | 16-6 | 28-5 | 11-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 22-13 | 4-5 | 17-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 6, the Norwegian reached the 3rd round after beating Alexandre Muller 6-3 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Ruud had a good straight sets win against Muller (6-3 6-4). During the match, Ruud scored 71 points vs Muller’s 55. Casper was quite aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ruud managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Casper Ruud lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Ruud put 54% of his first serves in, winning 73% (22/30) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (12/26) on the 2nd serve. Ruud broke Muller 6 times after converting 38% of his break points (6/16).
Ruud has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 65% of his matches (378-200). 7-2 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Ruud has an overall 219-97 match record in the last years on clay.
The Norwegian’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in Los Cabos, Acapulco and Carlo.
The Norwegian has an aggregate 25-7 win-loss record in 2024, 7-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Barcelona
Jordan Thompson
16 - 9win/loss
26
26
LWWWLLWLLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 35-24 | 23-13 | 3-5 | 5-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-28 | 22-15 | 0-3 | 7-4 | 12-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-26 | 18-14 | 2-6 | 8-1 | 12-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-25 | 10-11 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 9-5 | 2-2 |
| 2020 | 12-13 | 6-6 | 1-2 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 33, Thompson reached the 3rd round after defeating Jaume Antoni Munar Clar 6-4 2-6 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Jordan defeated Munar Clar (6-4 2-6 6-4).During the match Thompson scored less points (6) than Munar Clar. In fact, the world no. 6 won 103 points vs Munar Clar’s. That means that Thompson was more focused during the important points. The Australian was extremely aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about serving, Thompson wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Jordan Thompson lost the serve 3 times and he saved 13 break points. Furthermore, Thompson put 56% of his first serves in, winning 62% (37/60) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (26/47) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Munar Clar 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
His best result of the current season was winning the title in Los Cabos where he defeated Casper Ruud in the final 6-3 7-6(4).
Thompson has an aggregate 16-9 win-loss record in 2024, 3-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Barcelona
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ruud | Thompson |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 28 |
| Pts | 71-55 | 103-109 |
| Total Points | 126 | 212 |
| Winners | 22 | 37 |
| %Winners | 31% | 36% |
Both Ruud and Thompson played 1 match. At the moment, Jordan Thompson lost 1 set while Casper Ruud hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Ruud has played 1 set(s) less than Thompson (2 vs 3). Therefore, Ruud played 9 games less than Thompson. Ruud scored 22 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, Thompson scored 37 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ruud | Thompson |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 0 |
| 1st in | 30/56 | 60/107 |
| %1st in | 54% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 22/30 | 37/60 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 62% |
| 2nd pts | 12/26 | 26/47 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 55% |
Ruud scored 3 aces . Thompson didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Ruud won 73% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Thompson won 62% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ruud | Thompson |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 3 |
| Converted | 6/16 | 3/10 |
| % Converted | 38% | 30% |
| Conceded | 8 | 16 |
| Saved | 5 | 13 |
| % Saved | 63% | 81% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Ruud broke his opponent 6 times with a 38% conversion rate. Ruud surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. Jordan broke his opponent 3 times with a 30% conversion rate. Jordan conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 81% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ruud | |||
| R2 Muller |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 71-55 | 71-55 | |
| Total points | 126 | 126 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 30/56 | 30/56 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 22/30 | 22/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/26 | 12/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/16 | 6/16 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Thompson | |||
| R2 Munar Clar |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 103-109 | 103-109 | |
| Total points | 212 | 212 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 60/107 | 60/107 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 37/60 | 37/60 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |
| 2nd pts | 26/47 | 26/47 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | 3/10 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 30% | |
| Conceded | 16 | 16 | |
| Saved | 13/16 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 81% | 81% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLLLLWL
LWWWLLWLLW Tennis Scores in Barcelona
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Sebastian OfnerOfner (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Rafael NadalNadal (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Tomas MachacMachac (w/o) – See score progression
- Casper RuudRuud – Alexandre MullerMuller (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (6-0 3-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Nicolas JarryJarry (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Ugo HumbertHumbert (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Andrea VavassoriVavassori (4-6 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (6-4 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Matteo ArnaldiArnaldi – Sebastian BaezBaez (5-7 7-68 6-2) – See score progression
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Borna CoricCoric (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Nick HardtHardt (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – Harold MayotMayot (7-63 6-76 ret.) – See score progression
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Andrey RublevRublev (6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (6-0 3-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (7-6(4) 6-4) – See score progression
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Sebastian OfnerOfner (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Rafael NadalNadal (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Arthur FilsFils – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (6-4 1-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Ugo HumbertHumbert (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Nicolas JarryJarry (7-6(5) 6-3) – See score progression
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (6-4 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Casper RuudRuud – Alexandre MullerMuller (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Cameron NorrieNorrie (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Casper RuudRuud (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Dusan LajovicLajovic (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (0-0) – H2H and prediction
