Thai Kwiatkowski and Mitchell Krueger will play each other in the 2nd round of the Tallahassee Challenger for the 6th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 11:00 am on STADIUM. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mitchell Krueger who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mitchell Krueger is the pick to win this match.
Mitchell Krueger -> 1.615
Thai Kwiatkowski -> 2.21
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Thai Kwiatkowski vs. Mitchell Krueger
This will be the 6th time that Thai Kwiatkowski and Mitchell Krueger clash against each other. The head to head is 3-2 for Krueger (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Kwiatkowski won 3-6 7-6(4) 6-3 in the 1st round in the Tallahassee Challenger back in 2021.
Thai Kwiatkowski
20 - 8win/loss
395
181
LWLLLLWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-19 | 19-8 | 1-7 | 4-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-24 | 23-15 | 7-3 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 2-5 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-24 | 5-9 | 9-6 | 5-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-9 | 11-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 246, Thai got to the 2nd round after beating Tristan Boyer 2-6 6-2 6-4.
In the 1st round against Boyer, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-2 6-4). During the match, Kwiatkowski and Boyer scored the same amount of points (84). However, the world no. 246 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. The American was very aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Regarding the service games, Kwiatkowski struck 6 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Thai Kwiatkowski lost the serve 5 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Kwiatkowski put 56% of his first serves in, winning 71% (35/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 34% (13/38) on the 2nd serve. Thai broke Boyer 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Kwiatkowski has winning match record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (209-143). 1-2 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Kwiatkowski has a composed 42-25 record in the last years on clay.
Thai’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Santo Domingo.
Kwiatkowski has a compiled 20-7 win-loss record in 2024, 1-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tallahassee Challenger
Mitchell Krueger
16 - 10win/loss
146
135
LLWLLLLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 42-31 | 30-17 | 9-7 | 2-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-29 | 15-19 | 4-4 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-28 | 18-15 | 6-5 | 1-6 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-24 | 19-12 | 5-5 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-13 | 14-8 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 277, the American reached the 2nd round after defeating Ethan Quinn 6-1 7-62.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Quinn (6-1 7-62). During the match Krueger scored 74 points vs Quinn’s 58. Mitchell was pretty aggressive to blast 25 winners.
About the serving games, Krueger scored 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Mitchell Krueger lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Krueger put 59% of his first serves in, winning 63% (25/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 57% (16/28) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Quinn 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
His best result of the season was winning the title the Indian Wells 1 Challenger where he overcame Brandon Holt in the final 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Krueger has an overall 15-10 win-loss record in 2024, 4-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tallahassee Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the semifinal in 2017. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kwiatkowski | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 26 | 20 |
| Pts | 84-84 | 74-58 |
| Total Points | 168 | 132 |
| Winners | 35 | 25 |
| %Winners | 42% | 34% |
Both Kwiatkowski and Krueger played 1 match. At the moment, Thai Kwiatkowski lost 1 set while Mitchell Krueger hasn’t lost a set so far. Kwiatkowski has played 1 set more than Krueger (3 vs 2). Therefore, Kwiatkowski played 6 games more than Krueger. Thai scored 35 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Mitchell blasted 25 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kwiatkowski | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 2 |
| 1st in | 49/87 | 40/68 |
| %1st in | 56% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 35/49 | 25/40 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 13/38 | 16/28 |
| %2nd pts | 34% | 57% |
Kwiatkowski recorded 6 aces . Krueger recorded 2 aces . Kwiatkowski won 71% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 34% of the points. On the other side, Krueger won 63% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kwiatkowski | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 5 |
| Converted | 6/11 | 5/7 |
| % Converted | 55% | 71% |
| Conceded | 10 | 3 |
| Saved | 5 | 1 |
| % Saved | 50% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 2 |
Thai broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. The American lost his serve 5 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Mitchell broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kwiatkowski | |||
| R1 Boyer |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 84-84 | 84-84 | |
| Total points | 168 | 168 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 49/87 | 49/87 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 35/49 | 35/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/38 | 13/38 | |
| % 2nd pts | 34% | 34% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 5/10 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Krueger | |||
| R1 Quinn |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-62 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 74-58 | 74-58 | |
| Total points | 132 | 132 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 40/68 | 40/68 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 25/40 | 25/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/28 | 16/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLLLWLWW
LLWLLLLWLW Tennis Scores in Tallahassee Challenger
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Andres AndradeAndrade (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Corentin DenollyDenolly – Duarte ValeVale (6-4 7-60) – See score progression
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Martin DammDamm (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Ethan QuinnQuinn (6-1 7-62) – See score progression
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Dmitry PopkoPopko (6-0 7-62) – See score progression
- Martin Damm/Alex RybakovDamm/Alex Rybakov – Thomas Fancutt/Hunter ReeseFancutt/Hunter Reese (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Bogdan BobrovBobrov – Kaylan BigunBigun (4-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Gerald MelzerMelzer – Kyle EdmundEdmund (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Clement TaburTabur – Victor LilovLilov (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Bruno KuzuharaKuzuhara (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Tristan BoyerBoyer (2-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Zizou BergsBergs – Toby Alex KodatAlex Kodat (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Hady HabibHabib – Denis KudlaKudla (7-66 6-4) – See score progression
- Joel SchwaerzlerSchwaerzler – Giovanni FonioFonio (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Henry SearleSearle – Jeff WolfWolf (7-5 7-66) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee (4-6 6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Patrick KypsonKypson (7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Tristan BoyerBoyer (2-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Bruno KuzuharaKuzuhara (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Bogdan BobrovBobrov – Kaylan BigunBigun (4-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Gerald MelzerMelzer – Kyle EdmundEdmund (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Zizou BergsBergs – Toby Alex KodatAlex Kodat (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Bogdan BobrovBobrov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (5-3) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin DenollyDenolly – Calvin HemeryHemery (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Hady HabibHabib – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Gerald MelzerMelzer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement TaburTabur – Zizou BergsBergs (0-0) – H2H and prediction
