Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Tung-Lin Wu will play each other in the 2nd round of the Gwangju Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 11:00 am on SHOW COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Chak Lam Coleman Wong is the pick to win this match.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.58
Tung-Lin Wu -> 2.28
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Tung-Lin Wu
This will be the 2nd time that Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Tung-Lin Wu clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Wu (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Wu won 6-1 6-2 in the Rubber 4 in 1 back in 2022.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-36 | 39-26 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 188 (career-high), he will start his run in the Gwangju Challenger after he played his last match in the Gwangju Challenger where he beat 6-7(6) 7-5 6-3 to Echargui in the 1st round on the 16th of April.
Lam Coleman Wong has an aggregate 9-8 win-loss record in 2024, 9-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Lam Coleman Wong’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the New Delhi Challenger.
Talking about his overall career, Chak has an overall 100-72 record. He has a positive 79-53 record on hard.
Previously in the Gwangju Challenger
The has never competed in this tournament before.
Tung-Lin Wu
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 35-28 | 32-25 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-28 | 21-21 | 4-5 | 3-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-24 | 26-14 | 6-3 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-26 | 10-10 | 2-8 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-8 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 257, Tung-Lin got to the 2nd round after beating Dane Sweeny 4-6 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round against Sweeny, Wu recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-3). During the match Wu scored 97 points vs Sweeny’s 93. Tung-Lin was very aggressive to blast 45 winners.
About the serving games, Wu struck 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Tung-Lin Wu lost the serve 3 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Wu put 76% of his first serves in, winning 61% (45/74) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (12/23) on the 2nd serve. Wu broke Sweeny 5 times after converting 38% of his break points (5/13).
Wu’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Bakersfield.
Tung-Lin has a composed 7-9 win-loss record in 2024, 7-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Gwangju Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2019. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 34 | 28 |
| Pts | 114-104 | 97-93 |
| Total Points | 218 | 190 |
| Winners | 38 | 45 |
| %Winners | 33% | 46% |
Both Lam Coleman Wong and Wu played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost 1 set, while Tung-Lin Wu surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Lam Coleman Wong and Wu have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Lam Coleman Wong played 6 games more than Wu. Lam Coleman Wong scored 38 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Wu made 45 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 3 |
| 1st in | 54/110 | 74/97 |
| %1st in | 49% | 76% |
| 1st pts | 38/54 | 45/74 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 61% |
| 2nd pts | 33/56 | 12/23 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 52% |
Lam Coleman Wong fired 4 aces . Wu struck 3 aces . Lam Coleman Wong won 70% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Wu won 61% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 5/13 |
| % Converted | 50% | 38% |
| Conceded | 9 | 10 |
| Saved | 8 | 7 |
| % Saved | 89% | 70% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
The broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The dropped his serve once and he saved 89% of the break points that he conceded. Tung-Lin broke his opponent 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Chinese conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | ||
| Total | ||
|---|---|---|
| Score | ||
| Tot Set | 0 | |
| Tot Games | 0 | |
| pts | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | |
| %Winners | 0% | |
| SERVE | ||
| Aces | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | |
| 1st in | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | 0% | |
| 1st pts | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | % | |
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | 0% | |
| Breaks | ||
| Won | 0 | |
| Converted | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | 0% | |
| Conceded | 0 | |
| Saved | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | |
| Wu | |||
| R1 Sweeny |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 97-93 | 97-93 | |
| Total points | 190 | 190 | |
| Winners | 45 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 74/97 | 74/97 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 76% | |
| 1st pts | 45/74 | 45/74 | |
| % 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/23 | 12/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 7/10 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 70% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLLWLW
LLWLWLWLLW Tennis Scores in Gwangju Challenger
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Luke SavilleSaville (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Ricardas BerankisBerankis – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (7-66 6-1) – See score progression
- Yunseong ChungChung – Paul JubbJubb (6-4 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Mattia BellucciBellucci (0-6 6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Ji Sung NamSung Nam – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Arthur FeryFery – Fajing SunSun (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – James DuckworthDuckworth (6-3 6-76 6-1) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Li TuTu (4-6 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Jea Moon LeeMoon Lee (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Dane SweenySweeny (4-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Alibek KachmazovKachmazov – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Jules MarieMarie (6-3 3-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Alexander BlockxBlockx (3-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – James DuckworthDuckworth (6-3 6-7(6) 6-1) – See score progression
- Arthur FeryFery – Fajing SunSun (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Mattia BellucciBellucci (0-6 6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Mark LajalLajal – Duckhee LeeLee (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Ricardas BerankisBerankis – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (7-6(6) 6-1) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Li TuTu (4-6 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Luke SavilleSaville (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Yunseong ChungChung – Paul JubbJubb (6-4 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Jea Moon LeeMoon Lee (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Moez EcharguiEchargui (6-7(6) 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Ji Sung NamSung Nam – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard BerankisBerankis – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Yunseong ChungChung (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Alex BoltBolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
