Yasutaka Uchiyama and Paul Jubb will square off in the quarter of the Busan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 11:00 am on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Paul Jubb who should win in 3 sets.
Paul Jubb -> 1.67
Yasutaka Uchiyama -> 2.09
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Yasutaka Uchiyama vs. Paul Jubb
There is no head to head record between Yasutaka Uchiyama and Paul Jubb since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Yasutaka Uchiyama
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-25 | 26-18 | 1-1 | 6-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-24 | 27-22 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-21 | 16-13 | 0-0 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-26 | 9-13 | 0-3 | 1-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-13 | 4-5 | 0-2 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 241, the Japanese reached the quarter after beating Sho Shimabukuro 6-3 6-0 and Dane Sweeny 6-2 4-6 6-1.
In the 2nd round, The Japanese defeated Sweeny (6-2 4-6 6-1). During the match, Uchiyama scored 98 points vs Sweeny’s 83. Uchiyama was quite aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Regarding the service games, Uchiyama struck 10 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Yasutaka Uchiyama lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Uchiyama put 61% of his first serves in, winning 72% (42/58) of the points behind his 1st serve and 38% (14/37) on the 2nd serve. Uchiyama broke Sweeny 7 times after converting 41% of his break points (7/17).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Uchiyama has surrendered 1 set in this event to conquer 58% of the points he played.
Uchiyama has positive win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (257-215). 10-4 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Uchiyama has an aggregate 187-136 match record in the last years on hard.
Yasutaka’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Burnie 1 Challenger and the Burnie 2 Challenger.
The Japanese has an aggregate 12-6 win-loss record in 2024, 10-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Busan Challenger
Paul Jubb
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 47-27 | 26-13 | 0-2 | 12-7 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 424, Paul reached the quarter after defeating Jea Moon Lee 6-3 4-6 7-62, Fajing Sun 6-3 7-5, Li Tu 7-63 6-1 and Tung-Lin Wu 6-4 7-61.
In the 2nd round, Paul had a good straight sets win against Wu (6-4 7-61). During the match Jubb scored 74 points vs Wu’s 59. Jubb was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Jubb recorded 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Paul Jubb was very effective on serve to win 82% (31/38) of his 1st serve and 63% (15/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Jubb broke Wu twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Jubb started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
Paul’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the Glasgow Challenger.
Paul has an overall 17-8 win-loss record in 2024, 8-2 on hard (See FULL STATS)
.Previously in the Busan Challenger
Jubb has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Uchiyama | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 40 | 96 |
| Pts | 156-115 | 337-276 |
| Total Points | 271 | 613 |
| Winners | 68 | 143 |
| %Winners | 44% | 42% |
Uchiyama played 2 matches while Jubb competed in 4 matches. Jubb started his run from the qualifications while Uchiyama had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Yasutaka Uchiyama surrendered 1 set, while Paul Jubb surrendered 1 set. Uchiyama has played 4 set(s) less than Jubb (5 vs 9). Therefore, Uchiyama played 56 games less than Jubb. Uchiyama scored 68 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Paul managed to score 143 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Uchiyama | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 7.5 | 3.3 |
| 1st in | 92/148 | 199/321 |
| %1st in | 62% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 68/92 | 143/199 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 20/56 | 64/122 |
| %2nd pts | 36% | 52% |
Uchiyama managed to score 15 aces (7.5 per match). Jubb bagged 13 aces (3.3 per match). Uchiyama won 74% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 36% of the points. On the other side, Jubb won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Uchiyama | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 13 | 15 |
| Converted | 13/24 | 15/24 |
| % Converted | 54% | 63% |
| Conceded | 13 | 35 |
| Saved | 8 | 26 |
| % Saved | 62% | 74% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 9 |
The Japanese broke his opponents 13 times with a 54% conversion rate. Uchiyama surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 62% of the break points that he conceded. Paul broke his opponents 15 times with a 63% conversion rate. Jubb conceded his serve 9 times and he saved 74% of the break points that he conceded.
| Uchiyama | ||||
| R1 Shimabukuro | R2 Sweeny | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-0 | 6-2 4-6 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 25 | 40 | |
| pts | 58-32 | 98-83 | 156-115 | |
| Total points | 90 | 181 | 271 | |
| Winners | 26 | 42 | 68 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 43% | 44% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 10 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 5 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 34/53 | 58/95 | 92/148 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 61% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 26/34 | 42/58 | 68/92 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 72% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/19 | 14/37 | 20/56 | |
| % 2nd pts | 32% | 38% | 36% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 6 | 7 | 13 | |
| Converted | 6/7 | 7/17 | 13/24 | |
| Converted % | 86% | 41% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 9 | 13 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 6/9 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 67% | 59% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Jubb | ||||||
| Q1 Moon Lee | Q3 Sun | R1 Tu | R2 Wu | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 4-6 7-62 | 6-3 7-5 | 7-63 6-1 | 6-4 7-61 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 21 | 20 | 23 | 96 | |
| pts | 117-107 | 71-57 | 75-53 | 74-59 | 337-276 | |
| Total points | 224 | 128 | 128 | 133 | 613 | |
| Winners | 48 | 31 | 33 | 31 | 143 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 44% | 44% | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 6 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 17 | |
| 1st in | 73/120 | 43/69 | 45/70 | 38/62 | 199/321 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 62% | 64% | 61% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 48/73 | 31/43 | 33/45 | 31/38 | 143/199 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 72% | 73% | 82% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/47 | 14/26 | 10/25 | 15/24 | 64/122 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 54% | 40% | 63% | 52% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 15 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/5 | 5/7 | 2/3 | 15/24 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 80% | 71% | 67% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 15 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 35 | |
| Saved | 12/15 | 6/8 | 5/8 | 3/4 | 26 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 75% | 63% | 75% | 147% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (4-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Soon-Woo KwonKwon (0-3) – H2H and prediction