Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Blake Ellis will play each other in the 2nd round of the Busan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Chak Lam Coleman Wong is the pick to win this match.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.38
Blake Ellis -> 2.89
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Blake Ellis
There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Blake Ellis since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 40-34 | 38-24 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 194, Chak got to the 2nd round after defeating Alexander Blockx 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round, Chak had a good straight sets win against Blockx (6-3 6-3). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 63 points vs Blockx’s 45. The was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Lam Coleman Wong scored just 1 ace in the match and he committed only 1 double fault. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost the serve twice. Furthermore, Lam Coleman Wong put 69% of his first serves in, winning 72% (26/36) of the points behind his 1st serve and 38% (6/16) on the 2nd serve. Lam Coleman Wong broke Blockx 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 58% of his matches (99-71). 8-6 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Lam Coleman Wong has a composed78-52 win-loss record in the last 6 years on hard.
Lam Coleman Wong’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the New Delhi Challenger.
Chak has a composed 8-7 win-loss record in 2024, 8-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Busan Challenger
Lam Coleman Wong has never competed in this tournament before.
Blake Ellis
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 48-29 | 40-25 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 51-29 | 43-25 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 13-11 | 13-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 24-14 | 16-8 | 0-0 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2020 | 11-6 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 408, the Australian got to the 2nd round after defeating Mukund Sasikumar 5-7 6-3 6-3, Yuki Mochizuki 6-1 7-5 and Antoine Escoffier 6-71 6-3 7-64.
In the 1st round against Escoffier, The Australian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-71 6-3 7-64).During the match Ellis scored less points (3) than Escoffier. In fact, the world no. 194 won 123 points vs Escoffier’s. That means that Ellis was more focused during the important points. Blake was exceptionally aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about serving, Ellis recorded 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Blake Ellis lost the serve 8 times and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Ellis put 62% of his first serves in, winning 51% (39/77) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (22/47) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Escoffier 10 times after converting 40% of his break points (10/25).
Blake’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Mildura and M25 Swan Hill.
The Australian has a compiled 13-8 win-loss record in 2024, 7-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Ellis |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
Tot Games | 18 | 84 |
Pts | 63-45 | 291-272 |
Total Points | 108 | 563 |
Winners | 26 | 104 |
%Winners | 41% | 36% |
Lam Coleman Wong played 1 match while Ellis competed in 3 matches. Ellis started his run from the qualifications while Lam Coleman Wong had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Blake Ellis conceded 2 sets while Chak Lam Coleman Wong hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Lam Coleman Wong has played 6 set(s) less than Ellis (2 vs 8). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 66 games less than Ellis. Chak scored 26 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Ellis fired 104 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Ellis |
---|---|---|
Aces | 1 | 26 |
Avg per match | 1 | 8.7 |
1st in | 36/52 | 173/289 |
%1st in | 69% | 60% |
1st pts | 26/36 | 104/173 |
%1st pts | 72% | 60% |
2nd pts | 6/16 | 56/116 |
%2nd pts | 38% | 48% |
Lam Coleman Wong fired 1 ace . Ellis also managed to score 26 aces (8.7 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 72% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 38% of the points. On the other side, Ellis won 60% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Ellis |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 21 |
Converted | 5/12 | 21/49 |
% Converted | 42% | 43% |
Conceded | 2 | 36 |
Saved | 0 | 23 |
% Saved | 0% | 64% |
Times Broken | 2 | 13 |
Lam Coleman Wong broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. The lost his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Ellis broke his opponents 21 times with a 43% conversion rate. Blake conceded his serve 13 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded.
Lam Coleman Wong | |||
R1 Blockx |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 63-45 | 63-45 | |
Total points | 108 | 108 | |
Winners | 26 | 26 | |
%Winners | 41% | 41% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 36/52 | 36/52 | |
% 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
1st pts | 26/36 | 26/36 | |
% 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 6/16 | 6/16 | |
% 2nd pts | 38% | 38% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Ellis | |||||
Q1 Kumar Mukund |
Q3 Mochizuki |
R1 Escoffier |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 5-7 6-3 6-3 | 6-1 7-5 | 6-71 6-3 7-64 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
Tot Games | 30 | 19 | 35 | 84 | |
pts | 106-102 | 62-44 | 123-126 | 291-272 | |
Total points | 208 | 106 | 249 | 563 | |
Winners | 41 | 24 | 39 | 104 | |
%Winners | 39% | 39% | 32% | 36% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 9 | 12 | 5 | 26 | |
Double Faults | 8 | 2 | 4 | 14 | |
1st in | 66/116 | 30/49 | 77/124 | 173/289 | |
% 1st in | 57% | 61% | 62% | 60% | |
1st pts | 41/66 | 24/30 | 39/77 | 104/173 | |
% 1st pts | 62% | 80% | 51% | 60% | |
2nd pts | 26/50 | 8/19 | 22/47 | 56/116 | |
% 2nd pts | 52% | 42% | 47% | 48% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 5 | 6 | 10 | 21 | |
Converted | 5/15 | 6/9 | 10/25 | 21/49 | |
Converted % | 33% | 67% | 40% | 43% | |
Conceded | 13 | 4 | 19 | 36 | |
Saved | 10/13 | 2/4 | 11/19 | 23 | |
Saved % | 77% | 50% | 58% | 185% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 2 | 8 | 13 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Busan Challenger
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Arthur FeryFery (4-6 6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Philip SekulicSekulic (6-4 7-63) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Soon-Woo KwonKwon – Alibek KachmazovKachmazov (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (4-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Dane SweenySweeny (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Paul JubbJubb (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Soon-Woo KwonKwon (0-3) – H2H and prediction