![Prediction And Head To Head Filip Misolic Vs. Michael Geerts Hirtlmy77x Prediction and head to head Filip Misolic vs. Michael Geerts](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Filip-Misolic-vs.-Michael-Geerts-HiRTlmY77x.jpg)
Filip Misolic and Michael Geerts will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Split Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:30 am on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Filip Misolic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Filip Misolic is the pick to win this match.
Filip Misolic -> 1.46
Michael Geerts -> 2.59
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Filip Misolic vs. Michael Geerts
There is no head to head record between Filip Misolic and Michael Geerts since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Filip Misolic
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 11-14 | 1-4 | 10-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 39-28 | 6-9 | 25-13 | 8-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 36-18 | 5-4 | 31-12 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 46-16 | 0-1 | 44-13 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 18-12 | 1-2 | 14-9 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 164, Misolic got to the 2nd round after beating Billy Harris 7-5 6-3.
In the 1st round, Misolic had a good straight sets win against Harris (7-5 6-3). During the match, Misolic scored 71 points vs Harris’s 57. The Austrian was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Misolic bagged 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Filip Misolic lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Misolic put 62% of his first serves in, winning 77% (30/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (10/24) on the 2nd serve. Filip broke Harris 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Misolic has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 63% of his matches (146-87). 2-3 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Misolic has an aggregate120-55 record in the last 6 years on clay.
Misolic has an overall 3-8 win-loss record in 2024, 2-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Split Challenger
Michael Geerts
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Michael Geerts](https://tennistonic.com/engine/handlers/players_images_new/5831Michael-Geerts.jpg)
14 - 12win/loss
311
212
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 22-21 | 8-3 | 7-10 | 7-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 32-39 | 13-10 | 13-19 | 6-8 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
2022 | 42-37 | 5-8 | 24-14 | 11-13 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
2021 | 35-28 | 13-7 | 14-14 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 12-8 | 5-2 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
Ranked no. 331, Geerts reached the 2nd round after defeating Lorenzo Rottoli 7-62 6-1.
In the 1st round, Michael had a good straight sets win against Rottoli (7-62 6-1). During the match Geerts scored 69 points vs Rottoli’s 52. Michael was pretty aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Geerts scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Michael Geerts was pretty efficient on serve to win 73% (29/40) of his 1st serve and 62% (16/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Belgian broke Rottoli 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
The Belgian’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Cherbourg Challenger.
Michael has a compiled 14-12 win-loss record in 2024, 4-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Split Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Misolic | Geerts |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 21 | 20 |
Pts | 71-57 | 69-52 |
Total Points | 128 | 121 |
Winners | 30 | 29 |
%Winners | 42% | 42% |
Both Misolic and Geerts played 1 match. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Misolic and Geerts have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Misolic played 1 game more than Geerts. Filip scored 30 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Geerts recorded 29 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Misolic | Geerts |
---|---|---|
Aces | 5 | 1 |
Avg per match | 5 | 1 |
1st in | 39/63 | 40/66 |
%1st in | 62% | 61% |
1st pts | 30/39 | 29/40 |
%1st pts | 77% | 73% |
2nd pts | 10/24 | 16/26 |
%2nd pts | 42% | 62% |
Misolic managed to score 5 aces . Geerts blasted 1 ace . Misolic won 77% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 42% of the points. On the other side, Geerts won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Misolic | Geerts |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 3 |
Converted | 5/9 | 3/6 |
% Converted | 56% | 50% |
Conceded | 7 | 4 |
Saved | 5 | 3 |
% Saved | 71% | 75% |
Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Misolic broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. The Austrian lost his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Geerts broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Michael conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
Misolic | |||
R1 Harris |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
pts | 71-57 | 71-57 | |
Total points | 128 | 128 | |
Winners | 30 | 30 | |
%Winners | 42% | 42% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 39/63 | 39/63 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
1st pts | 30/39 | 30/39 | |
% 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 10/24 | 10/24 | |
% 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Geerts | |||
R1 Rottoli |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-62 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 69-52 | 69-52 | |
Total points | 121 | 121 | |
Winners | 29 | 29 | |
%Winners | 42% | 42% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 40/66 | 40/66 | |
% 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
1st pts | 29/40 | 29/40 | |
% 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 16/26 | 16/26 | |
% 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Split Challenger
- Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski – Zdenek KolarKolar (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Lukas NeumayerNeumayer – Mathys ErhardErhard (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Elmer MollerMoller – Lukas KleinKlein (7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Lorenzo RottoliRottoli (7-62 6-1) – See score progression
- Luka MikrutMikrut – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (6-77 7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – Jiri VeselyVesely (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Matej DodigDodig – Alex MolcanMolcan (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Marko TopoTopo – Felix GillGill (6-2 7-62) – See score progression
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Nerman FaticFatic (4-6 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (3-6 6-4 4-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Billy HarrisHarris (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Quentin HalysHalys – Ivan GakhovGakhov (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas NeumayerNeumayer – Mathys ErhardErhard (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Lorenzo RottoliRottoli (7-6(2) 6-1) – See score progression
- Elmer MollerMoller – Lukas KleinKlein (7-6(3) 6-3) – See score progression
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – Jiri VeselyVesely (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski – Zdenek KolarKolar (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Matej DodigDodig – Alex MolcanMolcan (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Marko TopoTopo – Felix GillGill (6-2 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Luka MikrutMikrut – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Henri SquireSquire – Jakub NicodNicod (6-2 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (6-7(7) 7-5 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Quentin HalysHalys (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Filip MisolicMisolic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – (0-0) – H2H and prediction