Marc Polmans and Skander Mansouri will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Mexico City Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:00 am on GRANDSTAND. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Marc Polmans who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Marc Polmans is the pick to win this match.
Marc Polmans -> 1.39
Skander Mansouri -> 2.84
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Marc Polmans vs. Skander Mansouri
There is no head to head record between Marc Polmans and Skander Mansouri since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Marc Polmans
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-28 | 18-18 | 4-4 | 0-1 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 50-35 | 32-23 | 14-9 | 2-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-13 | 14-12 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-28 | 1-6 | 8-13 | 2-6 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-16 | 2-6 | 5-4 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 172, the Australian reached the 2nd round after defeating Tristan Schoolkate 6-3 2-6 6-2.
In the 1st round, Polmans defeated Schoolkate (6-3 2-6 6-2). During the match, Polmans scored 76 points vs Schoolkate’s 69. Marc was exceptionally aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Regarding the service games, Polmans managed to score 8 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Marc Polmans lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Polmans put 64% of his first serves in, winning 82% (37/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (11/25) on the 2nd serve. Polmans broke Schoolkate 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Polmans has good match record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (302-230). 1-1 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Polmans has a composed 87-64 record in the last years on clay.
Marc has an overall 4-6 win-loss record in 2024, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Mexico City Challenger
The Australian has never competed in this tournament before.
Skander Mansouri
4 - 2win/loss
832
238
WLLLWLLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-7 | 1-4 | 5-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-30 | 30-26 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 73-35 | 71-26 | 0-3 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 50-25 | 41-17 | 8-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 28-15 | 26-13 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 425, the Tunisian reached the 2nd round after beating Guillermo Delgadillo 6-2 6-1, Nick Chappell 7-65 3-6 6-3 and Juan Alejandro Hernandez 4-6 6-4 7-5.
In the 1st round against Alejandro Hernandez, Skander recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 7-5).During the match Mansouri scored less points (1) than Alejandro Hernandez. In fact, the world no. 172 won 94 points vs Alejandro Hernandez’s. That means that Mansouri was more focused during the important points. Mansouri was pretty aggressive to blast 47 winners.
Talking about serving, Mansouri blasted 19 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Skander Mansouri was extremely effective on serve to win 75% (47/63) of his 1st serve and 52% (17/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Tunisian broke Alejandro Hernandez 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
The Tunisian has an aggregate 3-2 win-loss record in 2024, 3-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Polmans | Mansouri |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 25 | 78 |
| Pts | 76-69 | 261-232 |
| Total Points | 145 | 493 |
| Winners | 37 | 113 |
| %Winners | 49% | 43% |
Polmans played 1 match while Mansouri competed in 3 matches. Mansouri started his run from the qualifications while Polmans had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Marc Polmans surrendered 1 set, while Skander Mansouri lost 2 sets. Polmans has played 5 set(s) less than Mansouri (3 vs 8). Therefore, Polmans played 53 games less than Mansouri. The Australian scored 37 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Mansouri recorded 113 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Polmans | Mansouri |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 39 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 13 |
| 1st in | 45/70 | 144/251 |
| %1st in | 64% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 37/45 | 113/144 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 11/25 | 59/107 |
| %2nd pts | 44% | 55% |
Polmans bagged 8 aces . Mansouri blasted 39 aces (13 per match). Polmans won 82% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Mansouri won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Polmans | Mansouri |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 9 |
| Converted | 3/7 | 9/25 |
| % Converted | 43% | 36% |
| Conceded | 4 | 15 |
| Saved | 2 | 11 |
| % Saved | 50% | 73% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
Marc broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Marc dropped his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Skander broke his opponents 9 times with a 36% conversion rate. Skander conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
| Polmans | |||
| R1 Schoolkate |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 76-69 | 76-69 | |
| Total points | 145 | 145 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 45/70 | 45/70 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 37/45 | 37/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/25 | 11/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Mansouri | |||||
| Q1 Delgadillo |
Q3 Chappell |
R1 Alejandro |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | 7-65 3-6 6-3 | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 31 | 32 | 78 | |
| pts | 61-38 | 106-99 | 94-95 | 261-232 | |
| Total points | 99 | 205 | 189 | 493 | |
| Winners | 17 | 49 | 47 | 113 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 46% | 50% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 15 | 19 | 39 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 10 | 5 | 18 | |
| 1st in | 19/44 | 62/111 | 63/96 | 144/251 | |
| % 1st in | 43% | 56% | 66% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 17/19 | 49/62 | 47/63 | 113/144 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 79% | 75% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/25 | 26/49 | 17/33 | 59/107 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 53% | 52% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 3 | 9 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 2/6 | 3/9 | 9/25 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 33% | 33% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 10 | 5 | 15 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 8/10 | 3/5 | 11 | |
| Saved % | – | 80% | 60% | 140% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWWWLWW
WLLLWLLWWW Tennis Scores in Mexico City Challenger
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Benjamin LockLock (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez – Antoine BellierBellier (6-78 6-4 7-67) – See score progression
- Goncalo OliveiraOliveira – Alafia AyeniAyeni (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Federico GaioGaio (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Skander MansouriMansouri – Juan Alejandro HernandezAlejandro Hernandez (4-6 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Adam WaltonWalton (6-3 7-65) – See score progression
- Giovanni Mpetshi PerricardMpetshi Perricard – Matias SotoSoto (4-6 7-66 6-4) – See score progression
- Aidan MayoMayo – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (6-72 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco – Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee (7-62 3-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Giovanni FonioFonio (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (6-3 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Vasek PospisilPospisil (6-3 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Omar JasikaJasika (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (3-6 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Federico GaioGaio (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco – Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee (7-6(2) 3-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (7-6(5) 6-4) – See score progression
- Goncalo OliveiraOliveira – Alafia AyeniAyeni (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Giovanni Mpetshi PerricardMpetshi Perricard – Matias SotoSoto (4-6 7-6(6) 6-4) – See score progression
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Benjamin LockLock (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez – Antoine BellierBellier (6-7(8) 6-4 7-6(7)) – See score progression
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Giovanni FonioFonio (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Skander MansouriMansouri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Goncalo OliveiraOliveira – Bernard TomicTomic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
