Daniel Cukierman and Guido Ivan Justo will face off in the qualifications of the Florianopolis Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on QUADRA 3. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Guido Ivan Justo who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Guido Ivan Justo is the pick to win this match.
Guido Ivan Justo -> 1.8
Daniel Cukierman -> 1.94
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Daniel Cukierman vs. Guido Ivan Justo
There is no head to head record between Daniel Cukierman and Guido Ivan Justo since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Daniel Cukierman
11 - 7win/loss
526
339
LLWLWLWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-18 | 5-5 | 16-11 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-25 | 17-11 | 6-5 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 49-28 | 39-14 | 5-7 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-13 | 3-4 | 20-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-7 | 9-6 | 1-0 | 6-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 442, the Israeli reached the qualifications after beating Ignacio Carou 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, Cukierman had a good straight sets win against Carou (6-1 6-3). During the match, Cukierman scored 63 points vs Carou’s 40. The Israeli was very aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about the service games, Cukierman struck 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Daniel Cukierman was very efficient on serve to win 95% (19/20) of his 1st serve and 65% (13/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Cukierman broke Carou 4 times after converting 27% of his break points (4/15).
Cukierman has a solid match record in the last 9 years having won 62% of his matches (205-125). 8-4 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Cukierman has a composed40-26 win-loss record in the last 9 years on clay.
Cukierman has an aggregate 10-7 win-loss record in 2024, 8-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Florianopolis Challenger
Daniel has never competed in this tournament before.
Guido Ivan Justo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 40-25 | 0-1 | 40-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-17 | 4-3 | 27-13 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-9 | 1-5 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-7 | 8-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 567 (career-high), the Argentine got to the qualifications after beating Daniel Vecchio Couldrey Rebelo 6-1 6-0.
In the qualifications, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Vecchio Couldrey Rebelo (6-1 6-0). During the match Ivan scored 52 points vs Vecchio Couldrey Rebelo’s 25. The Argentine was extremely aggressive to blast 18 winners.
About the serving games, Ivan couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Guido Ivan Justo was pretty efficient on serve to win 75% (18/24) of his 1st serve and 61% (11/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Argentine broke Vecchio Couldrey Rebelo 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
The Argentine has an aggregate 7-5 win-loss record in 2024, 7-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Florianopolis Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cukierman | Ivan |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 13 |
| Pts | 63-40 | 52-25 |
| Total Points | 103 | 77 |
| Winners | 19 | 18 |
| %Winners | 30% | 35% |
Both Cukierman and Ivan played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Cukierman and Ivan have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Cukierman played 3 games more than Ivan. Cukierman scored 19 winners (30% of the total points). On the other side, Guido made 18 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cukierman | Ivan |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 0 |
| 1st in | 20/40 | 24/42 |
| %1st in | 50% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 19/20 | 18/24 |
| %1st pts | 95% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 13/20 | 11/18 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 61% |
Cukierman bagged 3 aces . Ivan didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Cukierman won 95% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Ivan won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cukierman | Ivan |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/15 | 5/6 |
| % Converted | 27% | 83% |
| Conceded | 0 | 1 |
| Saved | 0 | 1 |
| % Saved | 0% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Daniel broke his opponent 4 times with a 27% conversion rate. The Israeli very solid his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Argentine broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Guido was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Cukierman | |||
| Q1 Carou |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 63-40 | 63-40 | |
| Total points | 103 | 103 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 20/40 | 20/40 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | 50% | |
| 1st pts | 19/20 | 19/20 | |
| % 1st pts | 95% | 95% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/20 | 13/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/15 | 4/15 | |
| Converted % | 27% | 27% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Ivan | |||
| Q1 Vecchio Couldrey Rebelo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 52-25 | 52-25 | |
| Total points | 77 | 77 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 24/42 | 24/42 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 18/24 | 18/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/18 | 11/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLWWWW
LWWLWWLWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva – Paulo Andre Saraiva Dos SantosAndre Saraiva Dos Santos (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio GomezGomez – Gabriel Roveri SidneyRoveri Sidney (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro – Bogdan BobrovBobrov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro SakamotoSakamoto – Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel CukiermanCukierman – Guido Ivan JustoIvan Justo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander WeisWeis – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos Sanchez JoverSanchez Jover – Orlando LuzLuz (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Eduardo RibeiroRibeiro – Alvaro Guillen MezaGuillen Meza (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo Joaquin RodriguezJoaquin Rodriguez – Franco RoncadelliRoncadelli (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mateo Barreiros ReyesBarreiros Reyes – Jose PereiraPereira (0-1) – H2H and prediction
