Andrea Picchione and Federico Iannaccone will square off in the qualifications of the Barletta Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Federico Iannaccone who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Federico Iannaccone is the pick to win this match.
Federico Iannaccone -> 1.85
Andrea Picchione -> 1.89
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Andrea Picchione vs. Federico Iannaccone
There is no head to head record between Andrea Picchione and Federico Iannaccone since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Andrea Picchione
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 51-27 | 4-3 | 45-20 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 47-31 | 16-9 | 30-19 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 42-31 | 10-5 | 32-26 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-21 | 6-4 | 28-16 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 502, the Italian got to the qualifications after defeating Benito Massacri 6-1 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Massacri (6-1 6-2). During the match, Picchione scored 59 points vs Massacri’s 29. Andrea was very aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Regarding the service games, Picchione scored just 1 ace during the match and he committed only 2 double faults. Andrea Picchione was very efficient on serve to win 75% (18/24) of his 1st serve and 81% (13/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Andrea broke Massacri 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Picchione has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 61% of his matches (180-115). 6-2 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Picchione has a composed136-82 win-loss record in the last 7 years on clay.
Andrea’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15+H Bagnoles de l’Orne.
Andrea has a compiled 8-6 win-loss record in 2024, 6-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Barletta Challenger
The Italian has never competed in this tournament before.
Federico Iannaccone
13 - 10win/loss
531
466
LLWLLWWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-27 | 11-7 | 22-18 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-30 | 13-6 | 32-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-24 | 11-10 | 15-11 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-15 | 0-1 | 16-10 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2020 | 4-4 | 1-2 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 535, Iannaccone got to the qualifications after defeating Nikola Milojevic 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Milojevic (6-4 6-3). During the match Iannaccone scored 67 points vs Milojevic’s 58. Iannaccone was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
About the serving games, Iannaccone wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Federico Iannaccone lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Iannaccone put 69% of his first serves in, winning 59% (26/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (11/20) on the 2nd serve. Federico was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Milojevic 5 times.
Iannaccone’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Monastir.
Federico has a composed 13-9 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Picchione | Iannaccone |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 19 |
| Pts | 59-29 | 67-58 |
| Total Points | 88 | 125 |
| Winners | 18 | 26 |
| %Winners | 31% | 39% |
Both Picchione and Iannaccone played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Picchione and Iannaccone have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Picchione played 4 games less than Iannaccone. Picchione scored 18 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, Federico scored 26 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Picchione | Iannaccone |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 0 |
| 1st in | 24/40 | 44/64 |
| %1st in | 60% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 18/24 | 26/44 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 59% |
| 2nd pts | 13/16 | 11/20 |
| %2nd pts | 81% | 55% |
Picchione scored 1 ace . Iannaccone didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Picchione won 75% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 81% of the points. On the other side, Iannaccone won 59% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Picchione | Iannaccone |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/5 |
| % Converted | 71% | 100% |
| Conceded | 2 | 7 |
| Saved | 2 | 5 |
| % Saved | 100% | 71% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Andrea broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Picchione was rock solid on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 2 break points. Iannaccone broke his opponent 5 times with a 100% conversion rate. Federico conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
| Picchione | |||
| Q1 Massacri |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 59-29 | 59-29 | |
| Total points | 88 | 88 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 24/40 | 24/40 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 18/24 | 18/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/16 | 13/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 81% | 81% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Iannaccone | |||
| Q1 Milojevic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 67-58 | 67-58 | |
| Total points | 125 | 125 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 44/64 | 44/64 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 26/44 | 26/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 59% | 59% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/20 | 11/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/5 | 5/5 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLLWWW
LLWLLWWWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marius CopilCopil – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Jiri VeselyVesely (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas BouquetBouquet – Andrea GuerrieriGuerrieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle – Steven DiezDiez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Adrian OetzbachOetzbach (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kirill KivattsevKivattsev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo RottoliRottoli – Carlos Gimeno ValeroGimeno Valero (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Francesco PassaroPassaro (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PicchionePicchione – Federico IannacconeIannaccone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
