Daria Saville and Heather Watson will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Credit One Charleston Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 11:00 am on Court 3. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daria Saville who should win in 3 sets.
Daria Saville -> 1.52
Heather Watson -> 2.42
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Daria Saville vs. Heather Watson
This will be the 2nd time that Daria Saville and Heather Watson play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Gavrilova (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they competed against each other, Gavrilova won 7-5 6-4 in the 1st round in Madrid back in 2016.
Daria Saville
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 23-20 | 11-8 | 8-8 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 12-13 | 6-8 | 5-2 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 25-20 | 20-12 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 3-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 115, Gavrilova reached the qualifications after defeating Grace Min 6-1 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Min (6-1 6-2). During the match, Gavrilova scored 57 points vs Min’s 30. The Australian was extremely aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gavrilova struck 2 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Daria Saville lost the serve once and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Gavrilova put 64% of her first serves in, winning 69% (20/29) of the points behind her 1st serve and 69% (11/16) on the 2nd serve. Gavrilova broke Min 5 times after converting 83% of her break points (5/6).
Gavrilova has winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 56% of her matches (202-159). 1-0 on clay in 2024. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Gavrilova has a composed 50-36 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Gavrilova’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in Hobart.
Gavrilova has a composed 11-8 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Charleston
Heather Watson
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 9-14 | 3-6 | 1-4 | 4-1 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 32-25 | 18-13 | 2-4 | 6-3 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
2022 | 29-26 | 14-13 | 4-6 | 6-3 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 11-21 | 6-13 | 0-3 | 1-1 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
2020 | 15-11 | 14-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 143, Watson reached the qualifications after defeating Alana Smith 6-0 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Smith (6-0 6-4). During the match Watson scored 57 points vs Smith’s 33. The Brit was very aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about serving, Watson made 4 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Heather Watson was extremely efficient on serve to win 74% (20/27) of her 1st serve and 70% (14/20) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. Heather broke Smith 5 times after converting 63% of her break points (5/8).
The Brit’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the W50 Roehampton.
Heather has a compiled 8-7 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Charleston
Previously, her best result was reaching the 1st
round in 2010, 2011, 2015, 2018 and 2022. See her history.H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Gavrilova | Watson |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 15 | 16 |
Pts | 57-30 | 57-33 |
Total Points | 87 | 90 |
Winners | 20 | 20 |
%Winners | 35% | 35% |
Both Gavrilova and Watson played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Gavrilova and Watson have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Gavrilova played 1 game less than Watson. Daria scored 20 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit blasted 20 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Gavrilova | Watson |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 4 |
Avg per match | 2 | 4 |
1st in | 29/45 | 27/47 |
%1st in | 64% | 57% |
1st pts | 20/29 | 20/27 |
%1st pts | 69% | 74% |
2nd pts | 11/16 | 14/20 |
%2nd pts | 69% | 70% |
Gavrilova fired 2 aces . Watson bagged 4 aces . Gavrilova won 69% points behind her first serve. She extremely effective on her second serve to win 69% of the points. On the other side, Watson won 74% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 70% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Gavrilova | Watson |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 5 |
Converted | 5/6 | 5/8 |
% Converted | 83% | 63% |
Conceded | 3 | 2 |
Saved | 2 | 1 |
% Saved | 67% | 50% |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Daria broke her opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. The Australian surrendered her serve once and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded. The Brit broke her opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Watson conceded her serve once and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded.
Gavrilova | |||
Q1 Min | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
pts | 57-30 | 57-30 | |
Total points | 87 | 87 | |
Winners | 20 | 20 | |
%Winners | 35% | 35% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 29/45 | 29/45 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
1st pts | 20/29 | 20/29 | |
% 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
2nd pts | 11/16 | 11/16 | |
% 2nd pts | 69% | 69% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Watson | |||
Q1 Smith | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-0 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | 57-33 | 57-33 | |
Total points | 90 | 90 | |
Winners | 20 | 20 | |
%Winners | 35% | 35% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 27/47 | 27/47 | |
% 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
1st pts | 20/27 | 20/27 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 14/20 | 14/20 | |
% 2nd pts | 70% | 70% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Tennis Scores in Charleston
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Ruan RoelofseRoelofse (7-5 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Thomas FancuttFancutt (6-3 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Borna GojoGojo – Ronnie SchneiderSchneider (6-1 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jeff WolfWolf – Karue SellSell (6-3 4-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Usue Maitane ArconadaMaitane Arconada (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriela TalabaTalaba – Astra SharmaSharma (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Claire LiuLiu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daria GavrilovaGavrilova – Heather WatsonWatson (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mccartney KesslerKessler – Sachia VickeryVickery (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Ann LiLi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alize CornetCornet – Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Magda LinetteLinette – Petra MarticMartic (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto – Ana BogdanBogdan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor TownsendTownsend – Sofia KeninKenin (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Caroline DolehideDolehide – Kayla DayDay (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Arina RodionovaRodionova – Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mayar SherifSherif – Viktoriya TomovaTomova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Sloane StephensStephens (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Danielle Rose CollinsRose Collins – Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert (1-0) – H2H and prediction