Laura Siegemund and Darja Semenistaja will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Miami Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on COURT 7. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Laura Siegemund who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Laura Siegemund is the pick to win this match.
Laura Siegemund -> 1.3
Darja Semenistaja -> 3.32
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Laura Siegemund vs. Darja Semenistaja
There is no head to head record between Laura Siegemund and Darja Semenistaja since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Laura Siegemund
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-14 | 7-5 | 11-6 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-17 | 23-13 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-15 | 3-5 | 15-7 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 14-14 | 7-7 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-9 | 11-6 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 87, Laura reached the qualifications after defeating Robin Montgomery 6-0 6-0.
In the qualifications, Siegemund had a good straight sets win against Montgomery (6-0 6-0). During the match, Siegemund scored 62 points vs Montgomery’s 37. Laura was extremely aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Siegemund wasn’t able to score even 1 ace throughout the encounter and she committed only 3 double faults. Laura Siegemund conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 3 break points. Furthermore, Siegemund put 80% of her first serves in, winning 67% (26/39) of the points behind her 1st serve and 50% (5/10) on the 2nd serve. Laura broke Montgomery 6 times after converting 40% of her break points (6/15).
Siegemund has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 60% of her matches (245-163). 5-4 on hard in 2024. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this competition, Siegemund has an overall 83-73 match record in the last years on hard.
The German has an aggregate 5-5 win-loss record in 2024, 5-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Miami
Darja Semenistaja
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29-23 | 17-8 | 12-13 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-25 | 13-7 | 25-13 | 1-4 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-23 | 19-9 | 24-11 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 37-5 | 16-2 | 21-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-7 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 110 (career-high), Semenistaja reached the qualifications after defeating Arina Rodionova 7-61 6-2.
In the qualifications, Semenistaja had a good straight sets win against Rodionova (7-61 6-2). During the match Semenistaja scored 74 points vs Rodionova’s 59. Darja was exceptionally aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Semenistaja was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she was quite solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Darja Semenistaja lost the serve twice and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Semenistaja put 64% of her first serves in, winning 64% (27/42) of the points behind her 1st serve and 67% (16/24) on the 2nd serve. Darja broke Rodionova 4 times after converting 40% of her break points (4/10).
Her best result of the season was winning the title the W50 Bengaluru where she beat Carole Monnet in the final 6-1 3-0 ret. and the Mumbai where she overcame Storm Hunter in the final 5-7 7-6(6) 6-2.
The Latvian has an aggregate 17-7 win-loss record in 2024, 17-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Miami
Darja has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Siegemund | Semenistaja |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 12 | 21 |
| Pts | 62-37 | 74-59 |
| Total Points | 99 | 133 |
| Winners | 26 | 27 |
| %Winners | 42% | 36% |
Both Siegemund and Semenistaja played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Siegemund and Semenistaja have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Siegemund played 9 games less than Semenistaja. Laura scored 26 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Semenistaja scored 27 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Siegemund | Semenistaja |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 0 |
| 1st in | 39/49 | 42/66 |
| %1st in | 80% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 26/39 | 27/42 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 64% |
| 2nd pts | 5/10 | 16/24 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 67% |
Siegemund didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Semenistaja also didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Siegemund won 67% points behind her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Semenistaja won 64% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 67% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Siegemund | Semenistaja |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 4 |
| Converted | 6/15 | 4/10 |
| % Converted | 40% | 40% |
| Conceded | 3 | 5 |
| Saved | 3 | 3 |
| % Saved | 100% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The German broke her opponent 6 times with a 40% conversion rate. Laura pretty effective on her serve as she has never surrendered a single service game after saving 3 break points. The Latvian broke her opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. The Latvian conceded her serve twice and she saved 60% of the break points that she conceded.
| Siegemund | |||
| Q1 Montgomery |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 12 | 12 | |
| pts | 62-37 | 62-37 | |
| Total points | 99 | 99 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 39/49 | 39/49 | |
| % 1st in | 80% | 80% | |
| 1st pts | 26/39 | 26/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/15 | 6/15 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Semenistaja | |||
| Q1 Rodionova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-61 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 74-59 | 74-59 | |
| Total points | 133 | 133 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 42/66 | 42/66 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 27/42 | 27/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/24 | 16/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLLWWLWW
LWLLLWWLLW Tennis Scores in Miami
- Vladyslav ManafovManafov – Renzo OlivoOlivo (6-1 3-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Roberto MarcoraMarcora – Artem SmirnovSmirnov (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Jan ZielinskiZielinski (6-0 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova – Rebecca SramkovaSramkova (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor TownsendTownsend – Emina BektasBektas (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernarda PeraPera – Aleksandra KrunicKrunic (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jule NiemeierNiemeier – Storm SandersSanders (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Greetje MinnenMinnen – Claire LiuLiu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Oceane DodinDodin – Clara TausonTauson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laura SiegemundSiegemund – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emiliana ArangoArango – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yanina WickmayerWickmayer – Katie VolynetsVolynets (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harriet DartDart – Maria Lourdes CarleLourdes Carle (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Camila GiorgiGiorgi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shelby RogersRogers – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Donna VekicVekic – Karolina PliskovaPliskova (2-7) – H2H and prediction
- Marie BouzkovaBouzkova – Lin ZhuZhu (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo – Arantxa RusRus (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto – Naomi OsakaOsaka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sloane StephensStephens – Angelique KerberKerber (5-2) – H2H and prediction
- Elina AvanesyanAvanesyan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna BlinkovaBlinkova – Yue YuanYuan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daria GavrilovaGavrilova – Shuai ZhangZhang (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Xiyu WangWang – Emma RaducanuRaducanu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Xin Yu WangYu Wang – Hailey BaptisteBaptiste (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ana BogdanBogdan – Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Peyton StearnsStearns – Yafan WangWang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaqueline CristianCristian – Diane ParryParry (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cristina BucsaBucsa – Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko – Magda LinetteLinette (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Clara BurelBurel – Caroline WozniackiWozniacki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Simona HalepHalep – Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert (2-0) – H2H and prediction
