Jule Niemeier and Storm Hunter will square off in the qualifications of the Miami Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 4:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Storm Hunter who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Storm Hunter is the pick to win this match.
Storm Hunter -> 1.57
Jule Niemeier -> 2.31
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jule Niemeier vs. Storm Hunter
This will be the 2nd time that Jule Niemeier and Storm Hunter square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Sanders (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played each other, Sanders won 6-1 5-7 6-4 in the qualifications in Miami back in 2022.
Jule Niemeier
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-21 | 13-7 | 12-8 | 3-1 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-29 | 3-14 | 5-7 | 4-5 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-22 | 7-7 | 22-8 | 6-3 | 5-3 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 37-18 | 4-4 | 22-7 | 5-4 | 4-2 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 14-11 | 2-2 | 5-6 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 113, Jule reached the qualifications after defeating Nao Hibino 7-65 2-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, Jule defeated Hibino (7-65 2-6 6-4).During the match, Niemeier scored less points (4) than Hibino. In fact, the world no. 113 won 112 points vs Hibino’s. That means that Niemeier was more focused during the important points. The German was very aggressive to blast 49 winners.
Regarding the service games, Niemeier made 6 aces and she committed only 6 double faults. Jule Niemeier lost the serve 6 times and she saved 14 break points. Furthermore, Niemeier put 65% of her first serves in, winning 58% (49/84) of the points behind her 1st serve and 46% (21/46) on the 2nd serve. Niemeier broke Hibino 5 times after converting 63% of her break points (5/8).
Niemeier has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 61% of her matches (188-121). 13-6 on hard in 2024. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this event, Niemeier has an aggregate32-36 match record in the last 8 years on hard.
The German’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the W100 Irapuato.
Niemeier has an overall 16-7 win-loss record in 2024, 13-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Miami
Storm Hunter
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-5 | 14-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-15 | 12-10 | 9-4 | 1-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-19 | 17-12 | 2-3 | 3-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-15 | 10-7 | 11-5 | 2-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-7 | 6-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 124, Sanders got to the qualifications after beating Alize Cornet 7-61 2-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, Storm defeated Cornet (7-61 2-6 6-4). During the match Sanders scored 106 points vs Cornet’s 104. Sanders was pretty aggressive to blast 44 winners.
About the serving games, Sanders was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 7 double faults. Storm Hunter lost the serve 6 times and she saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Sanders put 68% of her first serves in, winning 58% (44/76) of the points behind her 1st serve and 46% (16/35) on the 2nd serve. Storm broke Cornet 5 times after converting 42% of her break points (5/12).
The Australian’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Mumbai.
Storm has an overall 12-4 win-loss record in 2024, 12-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Miami
Previously, her best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2021 and 2022. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Niemeier | Sanders |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 |
| Pts | 112-116 | 106-104 |
| Total Points | 228 | 210 |
| Winners | 49 | 44 |
| %Winners | 44% | 42% |
Both Niemeier and Sanders played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Jule Niemeier dropped 1 set, while Storm Hunter surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Niemeier and Sanders have played the same amount of sets 3. They also played the same amount of games (31). The German scored 49 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Sanders fired 44 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Niemeier | Sanders |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 0 |
| 1st in | 84/130 | 76/111 |
| %1st in | 65% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 49/84 | 44/76 |
| %1st pts | 58% | 58% |
| 2nd pts | 21/46 | 16/35 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 46% |
Niemeier bagged 6 aces . Sanders didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Niemeier won 58% points on her first serve. She was rock solid on her second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Sanders won 58% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Niemeier | Sanders |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/12 |
| % Converted | 63% | 42% |
| Conceded | 20 | 16 |
| Saved | 14 | 10 |
| % Saved | 70% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 6 | 6 |
Jule broke her opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Niemeier surrendered her serve 6 times and she saved 70% of the break points that she conceded. The Australian broke her opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. The Australian conceded her serve 6 times and she saved 63% of the break points that she conceded.
| Niemeier | |||
| Q1 Hibino |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 2-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 112-116 | 112-116 | |
| Total points | 228 | 228 | |
| Winners | 49 | 49 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 84/130 | 84/130 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 49/84 | 49/84 | |
| % 1st pts | 58% | 58% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/46 | 21/46 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 20 | 20 | |
| Saved | 14/20 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 70% | 70% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 6 | |
| Sanders | |||
| Q1 Cornet |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-61 2-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 106-104 | 106-104 | |
| Total points | 210 | 210 | |
| Winners | 44 | 44 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 76/111 | 76/111 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 44/76 | 44/76 | |
| % 1st pts | 58% | 58% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/35 | 16/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 16 | 16 | |
| Saved | 10/16 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLLWLWLW
LWWWLWLWWL Tennis Scores in Miami
- Vladyslav ManafovManafov – Renzo OlivoOlivo (6-1 3-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Roberto MarcoraMarcora – Artem SmirnovSmirnov (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Jan ZielinskiZielinski (6-0 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova – Rebecca SramkovaSramkova (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor TownsendTownsend – Emina BektasBektas (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernarda PeraPera – Aleksandra KrunicKrunic (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jule NiemeierNiemeier – Storm SandersSanders (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Greetje MinnenMinnen – Claire LiuLiu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Oceane DodinDodin – Clara TausonTauson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laura SiegemundSiegemund – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emiliana ArangoArango – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yanina WickmayerWickmayer – Katie VolynetsVolynets (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harriet DartDart – Maria Lourdes CarleLourdes Carle (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Camila GiorgiGiorgi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shelby RogersRogers – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Donna VekicVekic – Karolina PliskovaPliskova (2-7) – H2H and prediction
- Marie BouzkovaBouzkova – Lin ZhuZhu (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo – Arantxa RusRus (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto – Naomi OsakaOsaka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sloane StephensStephens – Angelique KerberKerber (5-2) – H2H and prediction
- Elina AvanesyanAvanesyan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna BlinkovaBlinkova – Yue YuanYuan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daria GavrilovaGavrilova – Shuai ZhangZhang (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Xiyu WangWang – Emma RaducanuRaducanu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Xin Yu WangYu Wang – Hailey BaptisteBaptiste (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ana BogdanBogdan – Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Peyton StearnsStearns – Yafan WangWang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaqueline CristianCristian – Diane ParryParry (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cristina BucsaBucsa – Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko – Magda LinetteLinette (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Clara BurelBurel – Caroline WozniackiWozniacki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Simona HalepHalep – Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert (2-0) – H2H and prediction
