Anna Schmiedlova and Rebecca Sramkova will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Miami Open for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Anna Schmiedlova who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Anna Schmiedlova is the pick to win this match.
Anna Schmiedlova -> 1.86
Rebecca Sramkova -> 1.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Anna Schmiedlova vs. Rebecca Sramkova
This will be the 4th time that Anna Schmiedlova and Rebecca Sramkova face off. The head to head is 2-1 for Anna Schmiedlova (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Anna Schmiedlova won 6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 in the quarter in the W60 Trnava back in 2022.
Anna Schmiedlova
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-26 | 16-14 | 16-10 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-26 | 15-13 | 14-9 | 1-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-30 | 8-9 | 17-15 | 8-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-24 | 15-9 | 20-11 | 0-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-10 | 7-7 | 9-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 69, the Slovakian got to the qualifications after defeating Anna Bondar 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, Karolina had a good straight sets win against Bondar (6-3 6-2). During the match, Anna Schmiedlova scored 63 points vs Bondar’s 42. Karolina was very aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Regarding the service games, Anna Schmiedlova was unable to score even 1 ace throughout the match and she committed only 1 double fault. Anna Schmiedlova was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 75% (33/44) of her 1st serve and 54% (7/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Karolina broke Bondar 3 times after converting 43% of her break points (3/7).
Anna Schmiedlova has positive record in the last 10 years having won 55% of her matches (262-218). 9-7 on hard in 2024. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Anna Schmiedlova has an overall 108-97 match record in the last years on hard.
The Slovakian’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in Austin.
The Slovakian has a compiled 9-7 win-loss record in 2024, 9-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Miami
Rebecca Sramkova
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 46-23 | 23-11 | 14-9 | 9-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-25 | 10-7 | 22-9 | 11-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-23 | 3-5 | 13-11 | 8-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-22 | 7-7 | 13-9 | 8-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 10-10 | 5-4 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 127, Rebecca got to the qualifications after defeating Rebeka Masarova 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Sramkova had a good straight sets win against Masarova (6-4 6-4). During the match Sramkova scored 66 points vs Masarova’s 52. The Slovakian was very aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Sramkova blasted 4 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Rebecca Sramkova was quite effective on serve to win 75% (30/40) of her 1st serve and 64% (9/14) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. Sramkova broke Masarova 3 times after converting 75% of her break points (3/4).
Her best result of the year was conquering the title the W50 Porto where she beat Jessica Bouzas Maneiro in the final 6-7(4) 7-5 6-1.
Sramkova has an overall 11-5 win-loss record in 2024, 5-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Miami
Previously, her best result was reaching the qualifications in 2017. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Anna Schmiedlova | Sramkova |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 20 |
| Pts | 63-42 | 66-52 |
| Total Points | 105 | 118 |
| Winners | 33 | 30 |
| %Winners | 52% | 45% |
Both Anna Schmiedlova and Sramkova played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Anna Schmiedlova and Sramkova have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Anna Schmiedlova played 3 games less than Sramkova. Karolina scored 33 winners (52% of the total points). On the other side, Sramkova struck 30 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Anna Schmiedlova | Sramkova |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 4 |
| 1st in | 44/57 | 40/54 |
| %1st in | 77% | 74% |
| 1st pts | 33/44 | 30/40 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 7/13 | 9/14 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 64% |
Anna Schmiedlova didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Sramkova blasted 4 aces . Anna Schmiedlova won 75% points on her first serve. She extremely effective on her second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Sramkova won 75% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Anna Schmiedlova | Sramkova |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/4 |
| % Converted | 43% | 75% |
| Conceded | 1 | 2 |
| Saved | 1 | 1 |
| % Saved | 100% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The Slovakian broke her opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Karolina pretty solid on her serve as she has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points. The Slovakian broke her opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Rebecca conceded her serve once and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded.
| Anna Schmiedlova | |||
| Q1 Bondar |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 63-42 | 63-42 | |
| Total points | 105 | 105 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 52% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 44/57 | 44/57 | |
| % 1st in | 77% | 77% | |
| 1st pts | 33/44 | 33/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/13 | 7/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Sramkova | |||
| Q1 Masarova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 66-52 | 66-52 | |
| Total points | 118 | 118 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 40/54 | 40/54 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 74% | |
| 1st pts | 30/40 | 30/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/14 | 9/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLLLLWW
LWWWLWWWWL Tennis Scores in Miami
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Jan ZielinskiZielinski (6-0 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Vladyslav ManafovManafov – Renzo OlivoOlivo (6-1 3-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Roberto MarcoraMarcora – Artem SmirnovSmirnov (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova – Rebecca SramkovaSramkova (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor TownsendTownsend – Emina BektasBektas (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernarda PeraPera – Aleksandra KrunicKrunic (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jule NiemeierNiemeier – Storm SandersSanders (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Greetje MinnenMinnen – Claire LiuLiu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Oceane DodinDodin – Clara TausonTauson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laura SiegemundSiegemund – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emiliana ArangoArango – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yanina WickmayerWickmayer – Katie VolynetsVolynets (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harriet DartDart – Maria Lourdes CarleLourdes Carle (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Camila GiorgiGiorgi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shelby RogersRogers – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Donna VekicVekic – Karolina PliskovaPliskova (2-7) – H2H and prediction
- Marie BouzkovaBouzkova – Lin ZhuZhu (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo – Arantxa RusRus (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto – Naomi OsakaOsaka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sloane StephensStephens – Angelique KerberKerber (5-2) – H2H and prediction
- Elina AvanesyanAvanesyan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna BlinkovaBlinkova – Yue YuanYuan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daria GavrilovaGavrilova – Shuai ZhangZhang (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Xiyu WangWang – Emma RaducanuRaducanu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Xin Yu WangYu Wang – Hailey BaptisteBaptiste (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ana BogdanBogdan – Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Peyton StearnsStearns – Yafan WangWang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaqueline CristianCristian – Diane ParryParry (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cristina BucsaBucsa – Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko – Magda LinetteLinette (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Clara BurelBurel – Caroline WozniackiWozniacki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Simona HalepHalep – Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert (2-0) – H2H and prediction
