Eric Vanshelboim and Evan Furness will face off in the qualifications of the Zadar Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Evan Furness who should win in 3 sets.
Evan Furness -> 1.69
Eric Vanshelboim -> 2.09
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Eric Vanshelboim vs. Evan Furness
There is no head to head record between Eric Vanshelboim and Evan Furness since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Eric Vanshelboim
12 - 8win/loss
531
357
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39-31 | 11-7 | 28-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 56-25 | 6-2 | 50-23 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-24 | 4-5 | 39-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 42-20 | 12-4 | 26-13 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-11 | 4-4 | 14-6 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 358, Vanshelboim reached the qualifications after beating Nikola Puntaric 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Vanshelboim had a good straight sets win against Puntaric (6-3 6-4). During the match, Vanshelboim scored 67 points vs Puntaric’s 52. Vanshelboim was very aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Vanshelboim wasn’t able to score even 1 ace during the match and he committed only 2 double faults. Eric Vanshelboim lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Vanshelboim put 80% of his first serves in, winning 68% (32/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 67% (8/12) on the 2nd serve. Vanshelboim broke Puntaric 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Vanshelboim has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 66% of his matches (199-102). 1-0 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Vanshelboim has an overall148-69 match record in the last 7 years on clay.
Vanshelboim’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Bhopal and M25 Chennai.
The Ukrainian has a composed 12-7 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Zadar Challenger
Vanshelboim has never competed in this tournament before.
Evan Furness
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-21 | 3-3 | 9-14 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 13-15 | 0-3 | 5-5 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-31 | 2-3 | 16-12 | 19-15 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 46-27 | 14-1 | 26-20 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2020 | 37-10 | 34-7 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 540, Furness got to the qualifications after beating Nikola Milojevic 7-5 6-4.
In the qualifications, Evan had a good straight sets win against Milojevic (7-5 6-4). During the match Furness scored 70 points vs Milojevic’s 58. The French player was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Furness fired 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Evan Furness lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Furness put 66% of his first serves in, winning 67% (28/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 68% (15/22) on the 2nd serve. The French player broke Milojevic 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Evan has an aggregate 7-6 win-loss record in 2024, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Vanshelboim | Furness |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 22 |
| Pts | 67-52 | 70-58 |
| Total Points | 119 | 128 |
| Winners | 32 | 28 |
| %Winners | 48% | 40% |
Both Vanshelboim and Furness played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Vanshelboim and Furness have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Vanshelboim played 3 games less than Furness. Vanshelboim scored 32 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Evan struck 28 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Vanshelboim | Furness |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 3 |
| 1st in | 47/59 | 42/64 |
| %1st in | 80% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 32/47 | 28/42 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 8/12 | 15/22 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 68% |
Vanshelboim didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Furness made 3 aces . Vanshelboim won 68% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Furness won 67% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 68% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Vanshelboim | Furness |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/6 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 50% | 50% |
| Conceded | 2 | 5 |
| Saved | 1 | 3 |
| % Saved | 50% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
The Ukrainian broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Vanshelboim dropped his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The French player broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Furness conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Vanshelboim | |||
| Q1 Puntaric | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 67-52 | 67-52 | |
| Total points | 119 | 119 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 47/59 | 47/59 | |
| % 1st in | 80% | 80% | |
| 1st pts | 32/47 | 32/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/12 | 8/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Furness | |||
| Q1 Milojevic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 70-58 | 70-58 | |
| Total points | 128 | 128 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 42/64 | 42/64 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 28/42 | 28/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/22 | 15/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Corentin MoutetMoutet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Clement TaburTabur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominic ThiemThiem – Filip KrajinovicKrajinovic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dennis NovakNovak – Timofey SkatovSkatov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (3-3) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Matteo MartineauMartineau (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Johan NiklesNikles – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Adrian AndreevAndreev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sandro KoppKopp – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mathys ErhardErhard – Andrea PicchionePicchione (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh – Sergi Perez ContriPerez Contri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eric VanshelboimVanshelboim – Evan FurnessFurness (0-0) – H2H and prediction