Quentin Halys and Emilio Nava will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Phoenix Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Quentin Halys who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Quentin Halys is the pick to win this match.
Quentin Halys -> 1.77
Emilio Nava -> 1.98
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Quentin Halys vs. Emilio Nava
There is no head to head record between Quentin Halys and Emilio Nava since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Quentin Halys
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 47-27 | 6-6 | 14-10 | 22-10 | 5-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 26-26 | 11-13 | 10-6 | 3-6 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 57-26 | 5-7 | 9-4 | 32-10 | 6-5 | 5-0 |
| 2021 | 35-27 | 14-8 | 10-9 | 8-8 | 0-1 | 3-1 |
| 2020 | 13-18 | 3-2 | 2-8 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 104, Quentin got to the 2nd round after beating Jeff Wolf 2-6 7-5 7-65.
In the 1st round against Wolf, Quentin recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 7-5 7-65). During the match, Halys and Wolf scored the same amount of points (108). However, the world no. 104 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Halys was very aggressive to blast 49 winners.
Regarding the service games, Halys buried his opponent with 26 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Quentin Halys lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Halys put 58% of his first serves in, winning 82% (49/60) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (21/43) on the 2nd serve. Halys broke Wolf twice after converting 25% of his break points (2/8).
Halys has positive record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (324-254). 2-3 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Halys has an overall 94-84 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
The French player best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Cherbourg Challenger.
The French player has a composed 7-6 win-loss record in 2024, 2-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Phoenix Challenger
Emilio Nava
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-34 | 16-15 | 8-9 | 8-5 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 10-7 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 134 (career-high), Emilio reached the 2nd round after defeating Benjamin Hassan 6-3 6-2, Vit Kopriva 6-4 6-4 and Yannick Hanfmann 6-4 6-0.
In the 1st round, Nava had a good straight sets win against Hanfmann (6-4 6-0). During the match Nava scored 59 points vs Hanfmann’s 37. The American was quite aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about serving, Nava fired 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Emilio Nava lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Nava put 66% of his first serves in, winning 66% (19/29) of the points behind his 1st serve and 67% (10/15) on the 2nd serve. Nava broke Hanfmann 6 times after converting 60% of his break points (6/10).
Nava has an aggregate 13-7 win-loss record in 2024, 9-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Phoenix Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2022 and 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Halys | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 33 | 53 |
| Pts | 108-108 | 188-133 |
| Total Points | 216 | 321 |
| Winners | 49 | 69 |
| %Winners | 45% | 37% |
Halys played 1 match while Nava competed in 3 matches. Nava started his run from the qualifications while Halys had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Quentin Halys conceded 1 set while Emilio Nava hasn’t dropped a set so far. Halys has played 3 set(s) less than Nava (3 vs 6). Therefore, Halys played 20 games less than Nava. Quentin scored 49 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The American managed to score 69 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Halys | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 26 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 26 | 4 |
| 1st in | 60/103 | 96/157 |
| %1st in | 58% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 49/60 | 69/96 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 21/43 | 41/61 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 67% |
Halys blasted 26 aces . Nava managed to score 12 aces (4 per match). Halys won 82% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Nava won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Halys | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 12 |
| Converted | 2/8 | 12/24 |
| % Converted | 25% | 50% |
| Conceded | 8 | 10 |
| Saved | 5 | 7 |
| % Saved | 63% | 70% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
The French player broke his opponent twice with a 25% conversion rate. The French player conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. Nava broke his opponents 12 times with a 50% conversion rate. Nava conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded.
| Halys | |||
| R1 Wolf |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 7-5 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 108-108 | 108-108 | |
| Total points | 216 | 216 | |
| Winners | 49 | 49 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 26 | 26 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 60/103 | 60/103 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 49/60 | 49/60 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/43 | 21/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 2/8 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Nava | |||||
| Q1 Hassan |
Q3 Kopriva |
R1 Hanfmann |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-4 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 20 | 16 | 53 | |
| pts | 61-40 | 68-56 | 59-37 | 188-133 | |
| Total points | 101 | 124 | 96 | 321 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | 19 | 69 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 37% | 32% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 3 | 3 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 31/52 | 36/61 | 29/44 | 96/157 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 59% | 66% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 25/31 | 25/36 | 19/29 | 69/96 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 69% | 66% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/21 | 16/25 | 10/15 | 41/61 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 64% | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | 12 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/8 | 6/10 | 12/24 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 38% | 60% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 3 | 5 | 10 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2/3 | 3/5 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 67% | 60% | 227% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWLWWLW
LWLWWWLLWL Tennis Scores in Phoenix Challenger
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Alexandre MullerMuller (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (6-0 4-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Christopher EubanksEubanks (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Vit KoprivaKopriva (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Adam WaltonWalton (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Luca Van AsscheVan Assche – Cristian GarinGarin (2-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Fabio FogniniFognini – Michael MmohMmoh (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Rinky HijikataHijikata (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Jurij RodionovRodionov (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini – Hugo GastonGaston (3-6 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (6-3 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Benoit PairePaire – Hamad MedjedovicMedjedovic (5-7 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Quentin HalysHalys – Jeff WolfWolf (2-6 7-5 7-65) – See score progression
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Christopher EubanksEubanks (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Fabio FogniniFognini – Michael MmohMmoh (7-6(4) 6-2) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Sebastian OfnerOfner (7-6(5) 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Benoit PairePaire – Nuno BorgesBorges (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Quentin HalysHalys – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Fabio FogniniFognini (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Sebastian OfnerOfner (0-1) – H2H and prediction
