Harold Mayot and Mitchell Krueger will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Phoenix Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 12:30 pm on COURT 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Harold Mayot who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Harold Mayot is the pick to win this match.
Harold Mayot -> 1.74
Mitchell Krueger -> 2.02
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Harold Mayot vs. Mitchell Krueger
There is no head to head record between Harold Mayot and Mitchell Krueger since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Harold Mayot
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29-21 | 9-5 | 11-9 | 4-4 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-29 | 11-9 | 9-13 | 7-5 | 4-1 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 40-33 | 13-8 | 19-13 | 7-11 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 15-14 | 0-1 | 7-3 | 7-9 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2020 | 14-12 | 5-4 | 5-5 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 142, the French player reached the qualifications after beating Brandon Stringfellow 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, Harold had a good straight sets win against Stringfellow (6-3 6-1). During the match, Mayot scored 60 points vs Stringfellow’s 40. Mayot was extremely aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Regarding the service games, Mayot made 7 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Harold Mayot was extremely efficient on serve to win 95% (19/20) of his 1st serve and 56% (15/27) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Mayot broke Stringfellow 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Mayot has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 55% of his matches (126-102). 7-3 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Mayot has a compiled36-25 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
The French player best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Noumea Challenger and the Quimper Challenger.
Harold has a compiled 11-7 win-loss record in 2024, 7-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Phoenix Challenger
The French player has never competed in this tournament before.
Mitchell Krueger
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-17 | 18-8 | 9-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-29 | 15-19 | 4-4 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-28 | 18-15 | 6-5 | 1-6 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-24 | 19-12 | 5-5 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-13 | 14-8 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 290, Krueger got to the qualifications after beating Felipe Meligeni Alves 6-3 7-61.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Meligeni Alves (6-3 7-61). During the match Krueger scored 74 points vs Meligeni Alves’s 64. Krueger was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Krueger struck 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Mitchell Krueger lost the serve twice and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Krueger put 66% of his first serves in, winning 77% (33/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 36% (8/22) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Meligeni Alves 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
His best result of the season was winning the title the Indian Wells 1 Challenger where he defeated Brandon Holt in the final 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Krueger has a composed 10-6 win-loss record in 2024, 9-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Phoenix Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2019 and 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mayot | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 22 |
| Pts | 60-40 | 74-64 |
| Total Points | 100 | 138 |
| Winners | 19 | 33 |
| %Winners | 32% | 45% |
Both Mayot and Krueger played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Mayot and Krueger have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Mayot played 6 games less than Krueger. Harold scored 19 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Mitchell recorded 33 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mayot | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 8 |
| 1st in | 20/47 | 43/65 |
| %1st in | 43% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 19/20 | 33/43 |
| %1st pts | 95% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 15/27 | 8/22 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 36% |
Mayot struck 7 aces . Krueger bagged 8 aces . Mayot won 95% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Krueger won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 36% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mayot | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/5 |
| % Converted | 57% | 80% |
| Conceded | 0 | 8 |
| Saved | 0 | 6 |
| % Saved | 0% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The French player broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. The French player extremely effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Mitchell conceded his serve twice and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Mayot | |||
| Q1 Stringfellow |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 60-40 | 60-40 | |
| Total points | 100 | 100 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 20/47 | 20/47 | |
| % 1st in | 43% | 43% | |
| 1st pts | 19/20 | 19/20 | |
| % 1st pts | 95% | 95% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/27 | 15/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Krueger | |||
| Q1 Meligeni |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-61 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 74-64 | 74-64 | |
| Total points | 138 | 138 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 43/65 | 43/65 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 33/43 | 33/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/22 | 8/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 36% | 36% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWWWLWLL
LLWWLWWWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Fabio FogniniFognini – Michael MmohMmoh (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- David GoffinGoffin – Terence AtmaneAtmane (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benoit PairePaire – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Harold MayotMayot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – Adam WaltonWalton (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Christian GarinGarin – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Nuno BorgesBorges (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Rinky HijikataHijikata (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Denis KudlaKudla (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Emilio NavaNava (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – Quentin HalysHalys (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GastonGaston – Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
