Clement Chidekh and Yusuke Takahashi will play each other in the qualifications of the Hamburg Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Clement Chidekh who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Clement Chidekh is the pick to win this match.
Clement Chidekh -> 1.23
Yusuke Takahashi -> 3.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Clement Chidekh vs. Yusuke Takahashi
There is no head to head record between Clement Chidekh and Yusuke Takahashi since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Clement Chidekh
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 64-26 | 17-7 | 7-6 | 39-11 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-17 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 24-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 11-9 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 26-5 | 23-4 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 320 (career-high), Chidekh reached the qualifications after beating Sarp Agabigun 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, Clement had a good straight sets win against Agabigun (6-1 6-3). During the match, Chidekh scored 69 points vs Agabigun’s 40. The French player was exceptionally aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Chidekh fired 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Clement Chidekh was pretty efficient on serve to win 92% (22/24) of his 1st serve and 53% (8/15) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The French player broke Agabigun 5 times after converting 29% of his break points (5/17).
Chidekh has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 68% of his matches (100-46). 17-5 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Chidekh has a compiled50-23 match record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Glasgow Challenger where he beat Paul Jubb in the final 0-6 6-4 6-1.
Chidekh has an aggregate 17-5 win-loss record in 2024, 17-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Hamburg Challenger
The French player has never competed in this tournament before.
Yusuke Takahashi
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-28 | 25-25 | 0-0 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-31 | 33-28 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-22 | 17-21 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-23 | 18-21 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 404, the Japanese reached the qualifications after beating Liam Gavrielides 3-6 6-2 6-0.
In the qualifications against Gavrielides, Takahashi recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-2 6-0). During the match Takahashi scored 79 points vs Gavrielides’s 59. The Japanese was quite aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Takahashi wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Yusuke Takahashi was quite effective on serve to win 75% (33/44) of his 1st serve and 63% (10/16) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Japanese broke Gavrielides 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
The Japanese has an overall 8-5 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Chidekh | Takahashi |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 23 |
| Pts | 69-40 | 79-59 |
| Total Points | 109 | 138 |
| Winners | 22 | 33 |
| %Winners | 32% | 42% |
Both Chidekh and Takahashi played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Yusuke Takahashi lost 1 set while Clement Chidekh hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Chidekh has played 1 set(s) less than Takahashi (2 vs 3). Therefore, Chidekh played 7 games less than Takahashi. The French player scored 22 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, The Japanese bagged 33 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Chidekh | Takahashi |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 0 |
| 1st in | 24/39 | 44/60 |
| %1st in | 62% | 73% |
| 1st pts | 22/24 | 33/44 |
| %1st pts | 92% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 8/15 | 10/16 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 63% |
Chidekh bagged 5 aces . Takahashi didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Chidekh won 92% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Takahashi won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Chidekh | Takahashi |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/17 | 5/12 |
| % Converted | 29% | 42% |
| Conceded | 1 | 2 |
| Saved | 0 | 1 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Chidekh broke his opponent 5 times with a 29% conversion rate. Clement conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Takahashi broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. Yusuke conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Chidekh | |||
| Q1 Agabigun |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 69-40 | 69-40 | |
| Total points | 109 | 109 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 24/39 | 24/39 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 22/24 | 22/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 92% | 92% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/15 | 8/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/17 | 5/17 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Takahashi | |||
| Q1 Gavrielides |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-2 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 79-59 | 79-59 | |
| Total points | 138 | 138 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 44/60 | 44/60 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 33/44 | 33/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/16 | 10/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWLLLWL
LWWLLWLLWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Kyle EdmundEdmund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Kenny de Schepperde Schepper (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kirill KivattsevKivattsev – Remy BertolaBertola (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Billy HarrisHarris (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Richard BerankisBerankis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri SquireSquire – Steven DiezDiez (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harry WendelkenWendelken – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
