Chun Hsin Tseng and Oleksii Krutykh will face off in the qualifications of the Szekesfehervar Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chun Hsin Tseng who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Chun Hsin Tseng is the pick to win this match.
Chun Hsin Tseng -> 1.6
Oleksii Krutykh -> 2.24
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Chun Hsin Tseng vs. Oleksii Krutykh
This will be the 2nd time that Chun Hsin Tseng and Oleksii Krutykh fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Hsin Tseng (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they squared off, Hsin Tseng won 6-3 6-3 in the 1st round in the Murcia Challenger back in 2022.
Chun Hsin Tseng
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-13 | 7-7 | 11-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-25 | 9-8 | 12-15 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-27 | 11-12 | 28-11 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 39-25 | 9-8 | 30-15 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 22-13 | 7-5 | 4-4 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 328, Chun reached the qualifications after defeating Arthur Gea 7-5 3-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Chinese defeated Gea (7-5 3-6 6-4).During the match, Hsin Tseng scored less points (1) than Gea. In fact, the world no. 328 won 99 points vs Gea’s. That means that Hsin Tseng was more focused during the important points. The Chinese was exceptionally aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Talking about the service games, Hsin Tseng managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Chun Hsin Tseng lost the serve 4 times and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Hsin Tseng put 55% of his first serves in, winning 69% (45/65) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (24/53) on the 2nd serve. The Chinese broke Gea 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Hsin Tseng has a winning win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 58% of his matches (198-141). 1-0 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Hsin Tseng has a composed88-58 record in the last 9 years on clay.
Chun’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in the Chennai Challenger.
Chun has a composed 8-8 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Szekesfehervar Challenger
The Chinese has never competed in this tournament before.
Oleksii Krutykh
3 - 9win/loss
451
160
LWLWLLLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11-17 | 1-3 | 10-13 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-32 | 13-8 | 15-16 | 4-5 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 49-27 | 2-3 | 44-20 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 41-25 | 8-3 | 32-20 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 22-12 | 13-7 | 7-4 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 397, Oleksii got to the qualifications after beating Patrik Meszaros 4-6 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications against Meszaros, Krutykh recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-2 6-4). During the match Krutykh scored 98 points vs Meszaros’s 84. Oleksii was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Krutykh struck 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Oleksii Krutykh was exceptionally effective on serve to win 72% (31/43) of his 1st serve and 58% (19/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Oleksii broke Meszaros 5 times after converting 29% of his break points (5/17).
Oleksii has an overall 3-8 win-loss record in 2024, 2-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Hsin Tseng | Krutykh |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 28 |
| Pts | 99-100 | 98-84 |
| Total Points | 199 | 182 |
| Winners | 45 | 31 |
| %Winners | 45% | 32% |
Both Hsin Tseng and Krutykh played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Chun Hsin Tseng lost 1 set, while Oleksii Krutykh lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Hsin Tseng and Krutykh have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Hsin Tseng played 3 games more than Krutykh. The Chinese scored 45 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The Ukrainian fired 31 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Hsin Tseng | Krutykh |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 3 |
| 1st in | 65/118 | 43/76 |
| %1st in | 55% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 45/65 | 31/43 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 24/53 | 19/33 |
| %2nd pts | 45% | 58% |
Hsin Tseng bagged 3 aces . Krutykh scored 3 aces . Hsin Tseng won 69% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Krutykh won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Hsin Tseng | Krutykh |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 5/17 |
| % Converted | 57% | 29% |
| Conceded | 13 | 8 |
| Saved | 9 | 5 |
| % Saved | 69% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 3 |
The Chinese broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. The Chinese surrendered his serve 4 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded. Oleksii broke his opponent 5 times with a 29% conversion rate. Krutykh conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded.
| Hsin Tseng | |||
| Q1 Gea |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 3-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 99-100 | 99-100 | |
| Total points | 199 | 199 | |
| Winners | 45 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 65/118 | 65/118 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 45/65 | 45/65 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/53 | 24/53 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
| Saved | 9/13 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 69% | 69% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Krutykh | |||
| Q1 Meszaros |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 98-84 | 98-84 | |
| Total points | 182 | 182 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 43/76 | 43/76 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 31/43 | 31/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/33 | 19/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/17 | 5/17 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWWWLLW
LWLWLLLWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Mathias BourgueBourgue (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Cezar Cretu (ROU)Cretu (ROU) (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Zsombor PirosPiros (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Matteo MartineauMartineau (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matyas FueleFuele – Manuel GuinardGuinard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mathys ErhardErhard – Gerald MelzerMelzer (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Zdenek KolarKolar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
