Marco Trungelliti and Mohamed Safwat will clash against each other in the quarter of the Kigali 2 Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 1:00 pm on CENTER. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Marco Trungelliti who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Marco Trungelliti is the pick to win this match.
Marco Trungelliti -> 1.28
Mohamed Safwat -> 3.38
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Marco Trungelliti vs. Mohamed Safwat
This will be the 3rd time that Marco Trungelliti and Mohamed Safwat face off. The head to head is 2-0 for Trungelliti (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on clay.
The last time that they squared off, Trungelliti won 3-6 6-3 6-0 in the semifinal in the Florence Challenger back in 2019.
Marco Trungelliti
13 - 6win/loss
136
112
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 44-26 | 12-11 | 30-13 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 38-29 | 7-8 | 30-19 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 23-16 | 4-3 | 16-11 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 27-16 | 4-2 | 20-11 | 0-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 11-17 | 5-2 | 6-11 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 208, the Argentine got to the quarter after defeating Jacob Brumm 7-5 6-2 and Thomas Fancutt 6-3 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Trungelliti had a good straight sets win against Fancutt (6-3 6-3). During the match, Trungelliti scored 59 points vs Fancutt’s 45. The Argentine was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about the service games, Trungelliti wasn’t able to score even 1 ace during the match and he committed only 2 double faults. Marco Trungelliti was pretty efficient on serve to win 80% (28/35) of his 1st serve and 67% (10/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Marco broke Fancutt 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Argentine hasn’t conceded yet a set in this tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Trungelliti has good record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (277-203). 6-1 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Trungelliti has a composed 187-116 record in the last years on clay.
Marco’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Kigali 1 Challenger.
The Argentine has a composed 12-6 win-loss record in 2024, 6-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Kigali 2 Challenger
Mohamed Safwat
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 30-22 | 15-6 | 15-15 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 61-28 | 36-10 | 24-16 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 25-24 | 2-6 | 22-15 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 10-24 | 1-2 | 5-14 | 3-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 16-16 | 11-9 | 3-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 369, Mohamed reached the quarter after defeating Max Houkes 6-2 6-4 and Juan Pablo Paz 7-64 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Safwat had a good straight sets win against Pablo Paz (7-64 6-2). During the match Safwat scored 75 points vs Pablo Paz’s 60. Safwat was very aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Safwat struck 3 aces and he was very solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Mohamed Safwat was very efficient on serve to win 83% (25/30) of his 1st serve and 70% (21/30) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Egyptian broke Pablo Paz twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Mohamed hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Mohamed’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M15 Sharm ElSheikh.
Safwat has an overall 8-5 win-loss record in 2024, 4-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Trungelliti | Safwat |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
Tot Games | 38 | 39 |
Pts | 124-97 | 135-107 |
Total Points | 221 | 242 |
Winners | 59 | 51 |
%Winners | 48% | 38% |
Both Trungelliti and Safwat played 2 matches. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Trungelliti and Safwat have played the same amount of sets 4. However, Trungelliti played 1 game less than Safwat. The Argentine scored 59 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, The Egyptian scored 51 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Trungelliti | Safwat |
---|---|---|
Aces | 4 | 6 |
Avg per match | 2 | 3 |
1st in | 79/111 | 62/115 |
%1st in | 71% | 54% |
1st pts | 59/79 | 51/62 |
%1st pts | 75% | 82% |
2nd pts | 20/32 | 35/53 |
%2nd pts | 63% | 66% |
Trungelliti struck 4 aces (2 per match). Safwat bagged 6 aces (3 per match). Trungelliti won 75% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Safwat won 82% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 66% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Trungelliti | Safwat |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 5 |
Converted | 7/10 | 5/10 |
% Converted | 70% | 50% |
Conceded | 8 | 3 |
Saved | 7 | 3 |
% Saved | 88% | 100% |
Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Trungelliti broke his opponents 7 times with a 70% conversion rate. The Argentine conceded his serve once and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded. Mohamed broke his opponents 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Egyptian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
Trungelliti | ||||
R1 Brumm |
R2 Fancutt |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 6-2 | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 18 | 38 | |
pts | 65-52 | 59-45 | 124-97 | |
Total points | 117 | 104 | 221 | |
Winners | 31 | 28 | 59 | |
%Winners | 48% | 47% | 48% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
1st in | 44/61 | 35/50 | 79/111 | |
% 1st in | 72% | 70% | 71% | |
1st pts | 31/44 | 28/35 | 59/79 | |
% 1st pts | 70% | 80% | 75% | |
2nd pts | 10/17 | 10/15 | 20/32 | |
% 2nd pts | 59% | 67% | 63% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
Converted | 4/6 | 3/4 | 7/10 | |
Converted % | 67% | 75% | 70% | |
Conceded | 7 | 1 | 8 | |
Saved | 6/7 | 1/1 | 7 | |
Saved % | 86% | 100% | 93% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Safwat | ||||
R1 Houkes |
R2 Pablo Paz |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-4 | 7-64 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 21 | 39 | |
pts | 60-47 | 75-60 | 135-107 | |
Total points | 107 | 135 | 242 | |
Winners | 26 | 25 | 51 | |
%Winners | 43% | 33% | 38% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
1st in | 32/55 | 30/60 | 62/115 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 50% | 54% | |
1st pts | 26/32 | 25/30 | 51/62 | |
% 1st pts | 81% | 83% | 82% | |
2nd pts | 14/23 | 21/30 | 35/53 | |
% 2nd pts | 61% | 70% | 66% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Converted | 3/5 | 2/5 | 5/10 | |
Converted % | 60% | 40% | 50% | |
Conceded | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
Saved | 3/3 | 0/0 | 3 | |
Saved % | 100% | – | 50% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Stefan KozlovKozlov (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Damien WengerWenger – Daniel CukiermanCukierman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement TaburTabur – Calvin HemeryHemery (0-1) – H2H and prediction