Kamil Majchrzak and David Pichler will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Kigali 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:30 am on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kamil Majchrzak who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kamil Majchrzak is the pick to win this match.
Kamil Majchrzak -> 1.069
David Pichler -> 7.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Kamil Majchrzak vs. David Pichler
There is no head to head record between Kamil Majchrzak and David Pichler since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Kamil Majchrzak
26 - 3win/loss
120
75
LLWWWWWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 63-19 | 26-6 | 34-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-22 | 19-10 | 4-6 | 4-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 34-21 | 4-4 | 16-9 | 5-5 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-10 | 1-3 | 5-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 440, Majchrzak reached the 2nd round after beating Junior Hakizumwami 6-1 6-0, Lucas Bouquet 6-0 6-2 and Ivan Gakhov 6-3 5-7 7-5.
In the 1st round, Kamil defeated Gakhov (6-3 5-7 7-5). During the match, Majchrzak scored 115 points vs Gakhov’s 105. The Pole was exceptionally aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Regarding the service games, Majchrzak recorded 8 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Kamil Majchrzak lost the serve twice and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Majchrzak put 52% of his first serves in, winning 83% (45/54) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (24/50) on the 2nd serve. Majchrzak broke Gakhov 3 times after converting 19% of his break points (3/16).
Majchrzak has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (323-189). 13-1 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Majchrzak has a composed 179-98 match record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Kigali 1 Challenger where he beat Marco Trungelliti in the final 6-4 6-4.
Kamil has an aggregate 25-3 win-loss record in 2024, 13-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Kigali 2 Challenger
David Pichler
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-22 | 4-8 | 11-12 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-33 | 5-7 | 23-23 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 43-29 | 11-5 | 32-23 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 31-27 | 2-2 | 28-22 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 18-17 | 16-11 | 2-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 579, David reached the 2nd round after beating Akram El Sallaly 6-2 6-3.
In the 1st round, David had a good straight sets win against El Sallaly (6-2 6-3). During the match Pichler scored 64 points vs El Sallaly’s 46. Pichler was pretty aggressive to blast 20 winners.
About the serving games, Pichler scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was exceptionally consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. David Pichler lost the serve twice. Furthermore, Pichler put 73% of his first serves in, winning 69% (20/29) of the points behind his 1st serve and 64% (7/11) on the 2nd serve. Pichler broke El Sallaly 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
David’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in M25 Bhopal.
David has a composed 5-5 win-loss record in 2024, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Majchrzak | Pichler |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 60 | 17 |
| Pts | 219-151 | 64-46 |
| Total Points | 370 | 110 |
| Winners | 76 | 20 |
| %Winners | 35% | 31% |
Majchrzak played 3 matches while Pichler competed in 1 match. Majchrzak started his run from the qualifications while Pichler had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Kamil Majchrzak dropped 1 set while David Pichler hasn’t dropped a set so far. Majchrzak has played 5 sets more than Pichler (7 vs 2). Therefore, Majchrzak played 43 games more than Pichler. Majchrzak scored 76 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Pichler fired 20 winners (31%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Majchrzak | Pichler |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 13 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 4.3 | 1 |
| 1st in | 88/168 | 29/40 |
| %1st in | 52% | 73% |
| 1st pts | 76/88 | 20/29 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 45/80 | 7/11 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 64% |
Majchrzak recorded 13 aces (4.3 per match). Pichler recorded 1 ace . Majchrzak won 86% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Pichler won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Majchrzak | Pichler |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 14 | 6 |
| Converted | 14/37 | 6/11 |
| % Converted | 38% | 55% |
| Conceded | 8 | 2 |
| Saved | 6 | 0 |
| % Saved | 75% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Kamil broke his opponents 14 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Pole dropped his serve twice and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. David broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. Pichler conceded his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Majchrzak | |||||
| Q1 Hakizumwami |
Q3 Bouquet |
R1 Gakhov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | 6-0 6-2 | 6-3 5-7 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 14 | 33 | 60 | |
| pts | 54-20 | 50-26 | 115-105 | 219-151 | |
| Total points | 74 | 76 | 220 | 370 | |
| Winners | 14 | 17 | 45 | 76 | |
| %Winners | 26% | 34% | 39% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 2 | 8 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 15/28 | 19/36 | 54/104 | 88/168 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 53% | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 14/15 | 17/19 | 45/54 | 76/88 | |
| % 1st pts | 93% | 89% | 83% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/13 | 11/17 | 24/50 | 45/80 | |
| % 2nd pts | 77% | 65% | 48% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 5 | 3 | 14 | |
| Converted | 6/13 | 5/8 | 3/16 | 14/37 | |
| Converted % | 46% | 63% | 19% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 | 6/8 | 6 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 75% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Pichler | |||||
| R1 El Sallaly |
Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |||
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |||
| pts | 64-46 | 64-46 | |||
| Total points | 110 | 110 | |||
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |||
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |||
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |||
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1st in | 29/40 | 29/40 | |||
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |||
| 1st pts | 20/29 | 20/29 | |||
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |||
| 2nd pts | 7/11 | 7/11 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |||
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |||
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |||
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |||
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |||
| Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |||
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |||
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |||
Head 2 Head
LLWWWWWWLL
LWLLLWLWWL Tennis Scores in Kigali 2 Challenger
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Thomas FancuttFancutt (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Corentin DenollyDenolly (6-3 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Clement TaburTabur – Hernan CasanovaCasanova (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mohamed SafwatSafwat – Juan Pablo PazPablo Paz (7-64 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Benjamin LockLock (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – David PichlerPichler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel CukiermanCukierman – Alafia AyeniAyeni (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Damien WengerWenger – Aziz OuakaaOuakaa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement TaburTabur – Calvin HemeryHemery (0-1) – H2H and prediction
