Marco Trungelliti and Thomas Fancutt will face off in the 2nd round of the Kigali 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:00 am on COURT 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Marco Trungelliti who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Marco Trungelliti is the pick to win this match.
Marco Trungelliti -> 1.175
Thomas Fancutt -> 4.55
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Marco Trungelliti vs. Thomas Fancutt
There is no head to head record between Marco Trungelliti and Thomas Fancutt since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Marco Trungelliti
11 - 6win/loss
151
112
LWLWLWWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 30-14 | 5-4 | 23-8 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-29 | 7-8 | 30-19 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-16 | 4-3 | 16-11 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-16 | 4-2 | 20-11 | 0-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-17 | 5-2 | 6-11 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 208, the Argentine reached the 2nd round after defeating Jacob Brumm 7-5 6-2.
In the 1st round, Trungelliti had a good straight sets win against Brumm (7-5 6-2). During the match, Trungelliti scored 65 points vs Brumm’s 52. Trungelliti was very aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Trungelliti made 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Marco Trungelliti lost the serve once and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Trungelliti put 72% of his first serves in, winning 70% (31/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the 2nd serve. The Argentine broke Brumm 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Trungelliti has positive match record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (276-203). 5-1 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Trungelliti has a composed 186-116 match record in the last years on clay.
Trungelliti’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Kigali 1 Challenger.
The Argentine has a compiled 11-6 win-loss record in 2024, 5-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Kigali 2 Challenger
Thomas Fancutt
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-10 | 2-4 | 4-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 28-20 | 18-17 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 8-1 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 34-23 | 28-18 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-18 | 16-15 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 653, Thomas got to the 2nd round after beating Etienne Niyigena 6-0 6-2, Leonid Sheyngezikht 6-3 6-4 and S D Prajwal Dev 6-2 7-5.
In the 1st round, The Australian had a good straight sets win against D Prajwal Dev (6-2 7-5). During the match Fancutt scored 72 points vs D Prajwal Dev’s 54. The Australian was quite aggressive to blast 33 winners.
About the serving games, Fancutt fired 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Thomas Fancutt lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Fancutt put 67% of his first serves in, winning 77% (33/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (10/21) on the 2nd serve. Fancutt broke D Prajwal Dev 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Fancutt has a compiled 6-6 win-loss record in 2024, 4-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Trungelliti | Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 53 |
| Pts | 65-52 | 197-138 |
| Total Points | 117 | 335 |
| Winners | 31 | 80 |
| %Winners | 48% | 41% |
Trungelliti played 1 match while Fancutt competed in 3 matches. Fancutt started his run from the qualifications while Trungelliti had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Trungelliti has played 4 set(s) less than Fancutt (2 vs 6). Therefore, Trungelliti played 33 games less than Fancutt. Trungelliti scored 31 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian recorded 80 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Trungelliti | Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 22 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 7.3 |
| 1st in | 44/61 | 104/153 |
| %1st in | 72% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 31/44 | 80/104 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 27/49 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 55% |
Trungelliti made 4 aces . Fancutt blasted 22 aces (7.3 per match). Trungelliti won 70% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Fancutt won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Trungelliti | Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 13 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 13/23 |
| % Converted | 67% | 57% |
| Conceded | 7 | 4 |
| Saved | 6 | 1 |
| % Saved | 86% | 25% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Marco broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Marco lost his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded. Thomas broke his opponents 13 times with a 57% conversion rate. Thomas conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 25% of the break points that he conceded.
| Trungelliti | |||
| R1 Brumm |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 65-52 | 65-52 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 44/61 | 44/61 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 31/44 | 31/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 10/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 6/7 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 86% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Fancutt | |||||
| Q1 Niyigena |
Q3 Sheyngezikht |
R1 D Prajwal Dev |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-2 | 6-3 6-4 | 6-2 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 19 | 20 | 53 | |
| pts | 59-31 | 66-53 | 72-54 | 197-138 | |
| Total points | 90 | 119 | 126 | 335 | |
| Winners | 22 | 25 | 33 | 80 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 38% | 46% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 12 | 5 | 22 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 28/37 | 33/52 | 43/64 | 104/153 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 63% | 67% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 22/28 | 25/33 | 33/43 | 80/104 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 76% | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/9 | 12/19 | 10/21 | 27/49 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 63% | 48% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 3 | 4 | 13 | |
| Converted | 6/10 | 3/7 | 4/6 | 13/23 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 43% | 67% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0/1 | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWWWWL
LLLLWWWLWL Tennis Scores in Kigali 2 Challenger
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Bogdan BobrovBobrov (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Florent BaxBax (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Noah SchachterSchachter (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Thomas FancuttFancutt – S D Prajwal DevD Prajwal Dev (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – Jaycer LyeonsLyeons (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Damien WengerWenger – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Daniel CukiermanCukierman – Ernest HabiyambereHabiyambere (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Jacob BrummBrumm (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Mohamed SafwatSafwat – Max HoukesHoukes (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Aziz OuakaaOuakaa – Guy Orly IradukundaOrly Iradukunda (4-6 6-1 7-63) – See score progression
- Corentin DenollyDenolly – Joshua SheehySheehy (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Clement TaburTabur – Emilien VoisinVoisin (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo PazPablo Paz – Yshai OlielOliel (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Noah SchachterSchachter (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Jacob BrummBrumm (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Thomas FancuttFancutt – S D Prajwal DevD Prajwal Dev (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Florent BaxBax (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel CukiermanCukierman – Ernest HabiyambereHabiyambere (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Thomas FancuttFancutt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo PazPablo Paz – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel CukiermanCukierman – Alafia AyeniAyeni (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Akram El SallalyEl Sallaly – David PichlerPichler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin DenollyDenolly – Calvin HemeryHemery (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Damien WengerWenger – Aziz OuakaaOuakaa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement TaburTabur – Hernan CasanovaCasanova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
