Rebeka Masarova and Linda Fruhvirtova will face off in the qualifications of the BNP Paribas Open for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 12:00 pm on STADIUM 5. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Rebeka Masarova who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Rebeka Masarova is the pick to win this match.
Rebeka Masarova -> 1.69
Linda Fruhvirtova -> 2.09
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Rebeka Masarova vs. Linda Fruhvirtova
This will be the 4th time that Rebeka Masarova and Linda Fruhvirtova play each other. The head to head is 3-0 for Fruhvirtova (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Fruhvirtova won 1-6 6-2 1-0 ret. in the 1st round in Ningbo back in 2023.
Rebeka Masarova
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-24 | 13-10 | 13-5 | 0-5 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 25-29 | 11-14 | 12-11 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-23 | 16-11 | 10-5 | 9-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-26 | 8-8 | 21-15 | 5-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 42-13 | 27-7 | 14-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 96, Rebeka reached the qualifications after beating Heather Watson 3-6 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications against Watson, The Spaniard recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 6-4).During the match, Masarova scored less points (2) than Watson. In fact, the world no. 96 won 106 points vs Watson’s. That means that Masarova was more focused during the important points. Masarova was extremely aggressive to blast 47 winners.
Talking about the service games, Masarova fired 8 aces and she was not very steady on her 2nd serve to score 11 double faults. Rebeka Masarova lost the serve 4 times and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Masarova put 60% of her first serves in, winning 72% (47/65) of the points behind her 1st serve and 32% (14/44) on the 2nd serve. The Spaniard broke Watson 5 times after converting 31% of her break points (5/16).
Masarova has a solid win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 65% of her matches (199-109). 3-5 on hard in 2024. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Masarova has an aggregate58-34 match record in the last 9 years on hard.
Rebeka has a composed 3-6 win-loss record in 2024, 3-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Indian Wells
Linda Fruhvirtova
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 34-25 | 23-16 | 2-5 | 2-1 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 21-31 | 11-21 | 5-5 | 1-1 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-28 | 15-19 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-18 | 20-7 | 7-7 | 1-1 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-8 | 16-4 | 3-2 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 137, Linda reached the qualifications after beating Emina Bektas 7-64 6-3.
In the qualifications, Fruhvirtova had a good straight sets win against Bektas (7-64 6-3). During the match Fruhvirtova scored 79 points vs Bektas’s 63. The Czech was very aggressive to blast 26 winners.
About the serving games, Fruhvirtova blasted 5 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Linda Fruhvirtova was quite efficient on serve to win 79% (26/33) of her 1st serve and 58% (18/31) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve 3 times. Fruhvirtova broke Bektas 4 times after converting 40% of her break points (4/10).
Linda has a composed 6-8 win-loss record in 2024, 6-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Indian Wells
Previously, her best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2023. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Masarova | Fruhvirtova |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 22 |
| Pts | 106-108 | 79-63 |
| Total Points | 214 | 142 |
| Winners | 47 | 26 |
| %Winners | 44% | 33% |
Both Masarova and Fruhvirtova played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Rebeka Masarova dropped 1 set while Linda Fruhvirtova hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Masarova has played 1 set more than Fruhvirtova (3 vs 2). Therefore, Masarova played 7 games more than Fruhvirtova. Masarova scored 47 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Fruhvirtova made 26 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Masarova | Fruhvirtova |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 5 |
| 1st in | 65/109 | 33/64 |
| %1st in | 60% | 52% |
| 1st pts | 47/65 | 26/33 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 14/44 | 18/31 |
| %2nd pts | 32% | 58% |
Masarova made 8 aces . Fruhvirtova blasted 5 aces . Masarova won 72% points on her first serve. She quite strong on her second serve to win 32% of the points. On the other side, Fruhvirtova won 79% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Masarova | Fruhvirtova |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/16 | 4/10 |
| % Converted | 31% | 40% |
| Conceded | 10 | 5 |
| Saved | 6 | 2 |
| % Saved | 60% | 40% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 3 |
Rebeka broke her opponent 5 times with a 31% conversion rate. The Spaniard dropped her serve 4 times and she saved 60% of the break points that she conceded. Linda broke her opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. The Czech conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 40% of the break points that she conceded.
| Masarova | |||
| Q1 Watson |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 106-108 | 106-108 | |
| Total points | 214 | 214 | |
| Winners | 47 | 47 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 11 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 65/109 | 65/109 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 47/65 | 47/65 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/44 | 14/44 | |
| % 2nd pts | 32% | 32% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/16 | 5/16 | |
| Converted % | 31% | 31% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 6/10 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Fruhvirtova | |||
| Q1 Bektas |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 79-63 | 79-63 | |
| Total points | 142 | 142 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 33/64 | 33/64 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 26/33 | 26/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/31 | 18/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLWLWLL
LWLWLLLWWW Tennis Scores in Indian Wells
- Nam Hoang LyHoang Ly – Sadio DoumbiaDoumbia (7-5 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alberto Romero De Avila SeniseRomero De Avila Senise – Albano OlivettiOlivetti (3-6 6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Yannick JankovitsJankovits – Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona (7-62 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Karim-Mohamed MaamounMaamoun – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Storm SandersSanders – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernarda PeraPera – Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nao HibinoHibino – Su-Wei HsiehHsieh (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor TownsendTownsend – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca SramkovaSramkova – Jessika PonchetPonchet (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mai HontamaHontama – Claire LiuLiu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kayla DayDay – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sara ErraniErrani – Arina RodionovaRodionova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harriet DartDart – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Clara TausonTauson – Hailey BaptisteBaptiste (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Camila GiorgiGiorgi – Katie BoulterBoulter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch – Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Angelique KerberKerber – Petra MarticMartic (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Caroline WozniackiWozniacki – Lin ZhuZhu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo – Marie BouzkovaBouzkova (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tatjana MariaMaria – Arantxa RusRus (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Yue YuanYuan (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cristina BucsaBucsa – Caroline DolehideDolehide (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sloane StephensStephens – Mayar SherifSherif (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elina AvanesyanAvanesyan – Oceane DodinDodin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Xin Yu WangYu Wang – Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Lucia BronzettiBronzetti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Xiyu WangWang – Clara BurelBurel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna BlinkovaBlinkova – Karolina PliskovaPliskova (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Diane ParryParry – Martina TrevisanTrevisan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Viktoriya TomovaTomova – Sofia KeninKenin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova – Greetje MinnenMinnen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto – Peyton StearnsStearns (0-0) – H2H and prediction
