Bernarda Pera and Maria Camila Osorio Serrano will fight against each other in the qualifications of the BNP Paribas Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 12:00 pm on STADIUM 4. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Bernarda Pera who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Bernarda Pera is the pick to win this match.
Bernarda Pera -> 1.75
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano -> 2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Bernarda Pera vs. Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
There is no head to head record between Bernarda Pera and Maria Camila Osorio Serrano since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Bernarda Pera
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25-16 | 12-10 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 20-23 | 9-12 | 10-7 | 0-1 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-20 | 10-9 | 19-6 | 4-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-24 | 5-11 | 8-8 | 4-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 10-13 | 9-8 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 78, Pera reached the qualifications after defeating Christasha McNeil 5-7 6-2 7-66.
In the qualifications against McNeil, Bernarda recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-2 7-66). During the match, Pera scored 111 points vs McNeil’s 100. Pera was quite aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about the service games, Pera bagged 3 aces and she was not very solid on her 2nd serve to score 13 double faults. Bernarda Pera lost the serve 5 times and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Pera put 59% of her first serves in, winning 66% (42/64) of the points behind her 1st serve and 44% (20/45) on the 2nd serve. The American broke McNeil 6 times after converting 55% of her break points (6/11).
Pera has a winning record in the last 9 years having won 57% of her matches (230-174). 9-7 on hard in 2024. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this competition, Pera has an overall82-88 match record in the last 9 years on hard.
The American has an aggregate 9-7 win-loss record in 2024, 9-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Indian Wells
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
5 - 5win/loss
78
33
WLWWLLWLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20-13 | 5-5 | 11-5 | 1-1 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-20 | 7-10 | 15-7 | 5-1 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 20-19 | 13-11 | 5-3 | 2-1 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-17 | 14-12 | 16-3 | 0-0 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-13 | 7-6 | 6-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 91, the Colombian reached the qualifications after beating Laura Pigossi 4-6 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications against Pigossi, Maria recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-4). During the match Camila Osorio Serrano scored 94 points vs Pigossi’s 73. Camila Osorio Serrano was very aggressive to blast 39 winners.
About the serving games, Camila Osorio Serrano scored just 1 ace during the entire match and she committed only 2 double faults. Maria Camila Osorio Serrano lost the serve 4 times and she saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Camila Osorio Serrano put 66% of her first serves in, winning 80% (39/49) of the points behind her 1st serve and 44% (11/25) on the 2nd serve. The Colombian broke Pigossi 5 times after converting 38% of her break points (5/13).
Maria has a compiled 5-4 win-loss record in 2024, 4-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Indian Wells
Previously, her best result was reaching the 1st round in 2021 and 2022. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Pera | Camila Osorio Serrano |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 33 | 29 |
| Pts | 111-100 | 94-73 |
| Total Points | 211 | 167 |
| Winners | 42 | 39 |
| %Winners | 38% | 41% |
Both Pera and Camila Osorio Serrano played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Bernarda Pera conceded 1 set, while Maria Camila Osorio Serrano dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Pera and Camila Osorio Serrano have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Pera played 4 games more than Camila Osorio Serrano. The American scored 42 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Camila Osorio Serrano scored 39 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Pera | Camila Osorio Serrano |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 1 |
| 1st in | 64/109 | 49/74 |
| %1st in | 59% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 42/64 | 39/49 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 20/45 | 11/25 |
| %2nd pts | 44% | 44% |
Pera bagged 3 aces . Camila Osorio Serrano recorded 1 ace . Pera won 66% points on her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Camila Osorio Serrano won 80% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Pera | Camila Osorio Serrano |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 5 |
| Converted | 6/11 | 5/13 |
| % Converted | 55% | 38% |
| Conceded | 10 | 5 |
| Saved | 5 | 1 |
| % Saved | 50% | 20% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 4 |
Pera broke her opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. The American conceded her serve 5 times and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded. Maria broke her opponent 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. Camila Osorio Serrano conceded her serve 4 times and she saved 20% of the break points that she conceded.
| Pera | |||
| Q1 McNeil |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 6-2 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 111-100 | 111-100 | |
| Total points | 211 | 211 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 13 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 64/109 | 64/109 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 42/64 | 42/64 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/45 | 20/45 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 5/10 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Camila Osorio Serrano | |||
| Q1 Pigossi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 94-73 | 94-73 | |
| Total points | 167 | 167 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 49/74 | 49/74 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 39/49 | 39/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/25 | 11/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 1/5 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 20% | 20% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWLLWLW
WLWWLLWLWL Tennis Scores in Indian Wells
- Nam Hoang LyHoang Ly – Sadio DoumbiaDoumbia (7-5 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alberto Romero De Avila SeniseRomero De Avila Senise – Albano OlivettiOlivetti (3-6 6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Yannick JankovitsJankovits – Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona (7-62 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Karim-Mohamed MaamounMaamoun – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Storm SandersSanders – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernarda PeraPera – Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nao HibinoHibino – Su-Wei HsiehHsieh (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor TownsendTownsend – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca SramkovaSramkova – Jessika PonchetPonchet (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mai HontamaHontama – Claire LiuLiu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kayla DayDay – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sara ErraniErrani – Arina RodionovaRodionova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harriet DartDart – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Clara TausonTauson – Hailey BaptisteBaptiste (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Camila GiorgiGiorgi – Katie BoulterBoulter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch – Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Angelique KerberKerber – Petra MarticMartic (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Caroline WozniackiWozniacki – Lin ZhuZhu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo – Marie BouzkovaBouzkova (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tatjana MariaMaria – Arantxa RusRus (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Yue YuanYuan (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cristina BucsaBucsa – Caroline DolehideDolehide (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sloane StephensStephens – Mayar SherifSherif (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elina AvanesyanAvanesyan – Oceane DodinDodin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Xin Yu WangYu Wang – Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Lucia BronzettiBronzetti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Xiyu WangWang – Clara BurelBurel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna BlinkovaBlinkova – Karolina PliskovaPliskova (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Diane ParryParry – Martina TrevisanTrevisan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Viktoriya TomovaTomova – Sofia KeninKenin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova – Greetje MinnenMinnen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto – Peyton StearnsStearns (0-0) – H2H and prediction
