Storm Hunter and Robin Montgomery will play each other in the qualifications of the BNP Paribas Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 2:00 pm on STADIUM 7. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Storm Hunter who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Storm Hunter is the pick to win this match.
Storm Hunter -> 1.59
Robin Montgomery -> 2.26
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Storm Hunter vs. Robin Montgomery
There is no head to head record between Storm Hunter and Robin Montgomery since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Storm Hunter
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-5 | 14-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-15 | 12-10 | 9-4 | 1-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-19 | 17-12 | 2-3 | 3-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-15 | 10-7 | 11-5 | 2-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-7 | 6-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 124, Sanders got to the qualifications after beating Jaqueline Cristian 6-3 7-5.
In the qualifications, Storm had a good straight sets win against Cristian (6-3 7-5). During the match, Sanders scored 76 points vs Cristian’s 61. Storm was very aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Sanders scored just 1 ace during the encounter and she committed only 7 double faults. Overall, Storm Hunter was very effective on serve to win 79% (26/33) of her 1st serve and 55% (11/20) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve twice. The Australian broke Cristian 5 times after converting 56% of her break points (5/9).
Sanders has winning record in the last 10 years having won 58% of her matches (168-120). 11-3 on hard in 2024. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this event, Sanders has a compiled 98-73 match record in the last years on hard.
Sanders’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Mumbai.
Sanders has an aggregate 11-3 win-loss record in 2024, 11-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Indian Wells
The Australian has never competed in this tournament before.
Robin Montgomery
10 - 4win/loss
161
143
WWWLWWLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-13 | 5-3 | 12-7 | 2-1 | 9-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 26-22 | 11-11 | 10-8 | 1-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-16 | 23-12 | 4-2 | 9-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 7-9 | 7-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-6 | 9-3 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 199, Robin got to the qualifications after beating Marina Bassols Ribera 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Robin had a good straight sets win against Bassols Ribera (6-4 6-4). During the match Montgomery scored 75 points vs Bassols Ribera’s 65. Robin was pretty aggressive to blast 24 winners.
About the serving games, Montgomery struck 6 aces and she committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Robin Montgomery was extremely effective on serve to win 80% (24/30) of her 1st serve and 52% (13/25) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve twice. The American broke Bassols Ribera 4 times after converting 24% of her break points (4/17).
The American’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the W35 Naples.
The American has a compiled 9-4 win-loss record in 2024, 4-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Indian Wells
Previously, her best result was reaching the 1st round in 2022. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sanders | Montgomery |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 20 |
| Pts | 76-61 | 75-65 |
| Total Points | 137 | 140 |
| Winners | 26 | 24 |
| %Winners | 34% | 32% |
Both Sanders and Montgomery played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Sanders and Montgomery have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Sanders played 1 game more than Montgomery. Storm scored 26 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, The American struck 24 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sanders | Montgomery |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 6 |
| 1st in | 33/53 | 30/55 |
| %1st in | 62% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 26/33 | 24/30 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 11/20 | 13/25 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 52% |
Sanders scored 1 ace . Montgomery also managed to score 6 aces . Sanders won 79% points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Montgomery won 80% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sanders | Montgomery |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/9 | 4/17 |
| % Converted | 56% | 24% |
| Conceded | 6 | 4 |
| Saved | 4 | 2 |
| % Saved | 67% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
The Australian broke her opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Sanders conceded her serve twice and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded. The American broke her opponent 4 times with a 24% conversion rate. The American conceded her serve twice and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded.
| Sanders | |||
| Q1 Cristian |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 76-61 | 76-61 | |
| Total points | 137 | 137 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 33/53 | 33/53 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 26/33 | 26/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/20 | 11/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Montgomery | |||
| Q1 Bassols |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 75-65 | 75-65 | |
| Total points | 140 | 140 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 30/55 | 30/55 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 24/30 | 24/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/25 | 13/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/17 | 4/17 | |
| Converted % | 24% | 24% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWLWWL
WWWLWWLWWW Tennis Scores in Indian Wells
- Yannick JankovitsJankovits – Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona (7-62 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Karim-Mohamed MaamounMaamoun – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nam Hoang LyHoang Ly – Sadio DoumbiaDoumbia (7-5 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alberto Romero De Avila SeniseRomero De Avila Senise – Albano OlivettiOlivetti (3-6 6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Storm SandersSanders – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernarda PeraPera – Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nao HibinoHibino – Su-Wei HsiehHsieh (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor TownsendTownsend – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca SramkovaSramkova – Jessika PonchetPonchet (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mai HontamaHontama – Claire LiuLiu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kayla DayDay – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sara ErraniErrani – Arina RodionovaRodionova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harriet DartDart – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Clara TausonTauson – Hailey BaptisteBaptiste (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Camila GiorgiGiorgi – Katie BoulterBoulter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch – Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Angelique KerberKerber – Petra MarticMartic (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Caroline WozniackiWozniacki – Lin ZhuZhu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo – Marie BouzkovaBouzkova (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tatjana MariaMaria – Arantxa RusRus (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Yue YuanYuan (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cristina BucsaBucsa – Caroline DolehideDolehide (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sloane StephensStephens – Mayar SherifSherif (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elina AvanesyanAvanesyan – Oceane DodinDodin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Xin Yu WangYu Wang – Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Lucia BronzettiBronzetti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Xiyu WangWang – Clara BurelBurel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna BlinkovaBlinkova – Karolina PliskovaPliskova (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Diane ParryParry – Martina TrevisanTrevisan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Viktoriya TomovaTomova – Sofia KeninKenin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova – Greetje MinnenMinnen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto – Peyton StearnsStearns (0-0) – H2H and prediction
