Noah Schachter and Jaycer Lyeons will play each other in the qualifications of the Kigali 2 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Noah Schachter who should win in 2 sets.
Noah Schachter -> 1.31
Jaycer Lyeons -> 3.25
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Noah Schachter vs. Jaycer Lyeons
This will be the 2nd time that Noah Schachter and Jaycer Lyeons fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Lyeons (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on clay.
The last time that they played, Lyeons won 5-7 7-6(4) 10-4 in the qualifications in M15 Cancun back in 2022.
Noah Schachter
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-17 | 3-5 | 8-9 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 26-19 | 22-12 | 1-5 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 12-10 | 9-9 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 13-8 | 9-6 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 859 (career-high), the American reached the qualifications after defeating Joshua Muhire 6-0 6-1.
In the qualifications, Noah had a good straight sets win against Muhire (6-0 6-1). During the match, Schachter scored 51 points vs Muhire’s 16. Schachter was extremely aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about the service games, Schachter blasted 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Noah Schachter was quite effective on serve to win 95% (18/19) of his 1st serve and 71% (10/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Muhire 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Schachter has a winning match record in the last 7 years having won 57% of his matches (81-61). 3-3 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Schachter has an aggregate15-14 match record in the last 7 years on clay.
Schachter has an overall 5-6 win-loss record in 2024, 3-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Kigali 2 Challenger
Jaycer Lyeons
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10-17 | 1-3 | 9-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 17-13 | 0-1 | 17-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 10-8 | 9-6 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 899, the American reached the qualifications after defeating Abraham Asaba 4-6 7-63 6-2.
In the qualifications against Asaba, Lyeons recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-63 6-2). During the match Lyeons scored 105 points vs Asaba’s 86. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 42 winners.
About the serving games, Lyeons fired 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Jaycer Lyeons lost the serve 4 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Lyeons put 66% of his first serves in, winning 68% (42/62) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (16/32) on the 2nd serve. Lyeons broke Asaba 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
The American has a composed 5-7 win-loss record in 2024, 5-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Schachter | Lyeons |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 13 | 31 |
| Pts | 51-16 | 105-86 |
| Total Points | 67 | 191 |
| Winners | 18 | 42 |
| %Winners | 35% | 40% |
Both Schachter and Lyeons played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Jaycer Lyeons conceded 1 set while Noah Schachter hasn’t lost a set so far. Schachter has played 1 set(s) less than Lyeons (2 vs 3). Therefore, Schachter played 18 games less than Lyeons. Schachter scored 18 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Lyeons recorded 42 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Schachter | Lyeons |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 3 |
| 1st in | 19/33 | 62/94 |
| %1st in | 58% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 18/19 | 42/62 |
| %1st pts | 95% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 10/14 | 16/32 |
| %2nd pts | 71% | 50% |
Schachter blasted 3 aces . Lyeons scored 3 aces . Schachter won 95% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 71% of the points. On the other side, Lyeons won 68% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Schachter | Lyeons |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/12 |
| % Converted | 83% | 42% |
| Conceded | 0 | 6 |
| Saved | 0 | 2 |
| % Saved | 0% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
Noah broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Schachter pretty effective on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. Lyeons broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. Lyeons conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Schachter | |||
| Q1 Muhire | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 51-16 | 51-16 | |
| Total points | 67 | 67 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 19/33 | 19/33 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 18/19 | 18/19 | |
| % 1st pts | 95% | 95% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/14 | 10/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Lyeons | |||
| Q1 Asaba | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-63 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 105-86 | 105-86 | |
| Total points | 191 | 191 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 62/94 | 62/94 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 42/62 | 42/62 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/32 | 16/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 2/6 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mohamed SafwatSafwat – Max HoukesHoukes (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Jacob BrummBrumm (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Guy Orly IradukundaOrly Iradukunda – Aziz OuakaaOuakaa (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Ivan DenisovDenisov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bogdan BobrovBobrov – Calvin HemeryHemery (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Lucas BouquetBouquet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thomas FancuttFancutt – Leonid SheyngezikhtSheyngezikht (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel CukiermanCukierman – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Akram El SallalyEl Sallaly – Kelsey StevensonStevenson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin DenollyDenolly – Joshua SheehySheehy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yshai OlielOliel – Juan Pablo PazPablo Paz (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – Aziz DougazDougaz (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Clement TaburTabur – Emilien VoisinVoisin (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Florent BaxBax – Seita WatanabeWatanabe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Noah SchachterSchachter – Jaycer LyeonsLyeons (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Damien WengerWenger (2-0) – H2H and prediction