Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Geoffrey Blancaneaux will square off in the final of the New Delhi Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 2:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Chak Lam Coleman Wong is the pick to win this match.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.85
Geoffrey Blancaneaux -> 1.89
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Geoffrey Blancaneaux
There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Geoffrey Blancaneaux since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-36 | 39-26 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 241, Chak reached the final after beating Mukund Sasikumar 6-4 4-6 7-5, Valentin Vacherot w/o, Tristan Schoolkate 7-610 6-3 and Yuta Shimizu 7-65 6-4.
In the semifinal, Chak had a good straight sets win against Shimizu (7-65 6-4). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 90 points vs Shimizu’s 86. Lam Coleman Wong was quite aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lam Coleman Wong made 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Chak Lam Coleman Wong conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 10 break points. Furthermore, Lam Coleman Wong put 57% of his first serves in, winning 62% (31/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 70% (26/37) on the 2nd serve. Lam Coleman Wong broke Shimizu once after converting 11% of his break points (1/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Lam Coleman Wong has surrendered 1 set in this competition to win 53% of the points he played.
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 59% of his matches (96-68). 5-4 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Lam Coleman Wong has a composed75-50 record in the last 6 years on hard.
Chak’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the New Delhi Challenger.
Chak has a composed 5-4 win-loss record in 2024, 5-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the New Delhi Challenger
The has never competed in this tournament before.
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-33 | 6-5 | 13-19 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-37 | 7-10 | 14-18 | 8-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-38 | 17-10 | 14-15 | 8-10 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-31 | 8-6 | 17-19 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
| 2020 | 23-17 | 11-3 | 5-9 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
Ranked no. 277, Blancaneaux got to the final after beating Moez Echargui 6-3 2-6 6-3, Adam Walton 6-3 6-0, Philip Sekulic 7-63 6-2 and Tristan Boyer 6-3 6-4.
In the semifinal, Blancaneaux had a good straight sets win against Boyer (6-3 6-4). During the match Blancaneaux scored 67 points vs Boyer’s 57. The French player was very aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about serving, Blancaneaux couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Geoffrey Blancaneaux lost the serve once and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Blancaneaux put 70% of his first serves in, winning 70% (35/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (10/21) on the 2nd serve. Geoffrey broke Boyer 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The French player has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
The French player best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in the New Delhi Challenger.
Geoffrey has an aggregate 5-6 win-loss record in 2024, 5-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Blancaneaux |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 77 | 81 |
| Pts | 285-254 | 285-231 |
| Total Points | 539 | 516 |
| Winners | 96 | 117 |
| %Winners | 34% | 41% |
Lam Coleman Wong played 3 matches while Blancaneaux competed in 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Chak Lam Coleman Wong surrendered 1 set, while Geoffrey Blancaneaux lost 1 set. Lam Coleman Wong has played 2 set(s) less than Blancaneaux (7 vs 9). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 4 games less than Blancaneaux. The scored 96 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Blancaneaux managed to score 117 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Blancaneaux |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 19 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 6.3 | 2 |
| 1st in | 135/259 | 163/271 |
| %1st in | 52% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 96/135 | 117/163 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 73/124 | 50/108 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 46% |
Lam Coleman Wong fired 19 aces (6.3 per match). Blancaneaux made 8 aces (2 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 71% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Blancaneaux won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Blancaneaux |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 18 |
| Converted | 8/26 | 18/31 |
| % Converted | 31% | 58% |
| Conceded | 23 | 25 |
| Saved | 18 | 16 |
| % Saved | 78% | 64% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 9 |
The broke his opponents 8 times with a 31% conversion rate. Lam Coleman Wong lost his serve 5 times and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. Geoffrey broke his opponents 18 times with a 58% conversion rate. Blancaneaux conceded his serve 9 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | ||||||
| R1 Kumar Mukund |
R2 Vacherot |
1/4 Schoolkate |
1/2 Shimizu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | w/o | 7-610 6-3 | 7-65 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | – | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | – | 22 | 23 | 77 | |
| pts | 121-109 | – | 74-59 | 90-86 | 285-254 | |
| Total points | 230 | – | 133 | 176 | 539 | |
| Winners | 39 | – | 26 | 31 | 96 | |
| %Winners | 32% | – | 35% | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 13 | – | 3 | 3 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | – | 1 | 1 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 52/107 | – | 33/65 | 50/87 | 135/259 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | – | 51% | 57% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 39/52 | – | 26/33 | 31/50 | 96/135 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | – | 79% | 62% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/55 | – | 22/32 | 26/37 | 73/124 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | – | 69% | 70% | 59% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | – | 2 | 1 | 8 | |
| Converted | 5/15 | – | 2/2 | 1/9 | 8/26 | |
| Converted % | 33% | – | 100% | 11% | 31% | |
| Conceded | 12 | – | 1 | 10 | 23 | |
| Saved | 8/12 | – | 0/1 | 10/10 | 18 | |
| Saved % | 67% | – | 0% | 100% | 42% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | – | 1 | 0 | 5 | |
| Blancaneaux | ||||||
| R1 Echargui |
R2 Walton |
1/4 Sekulic |
1/2 Boyer |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | 6-3 6-0 | 7-63 6-2 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 15 | 21 | 19 | 81 | |
| pts | 87-83 | 58-33 | 73-58 | 67-57 | 285-231 | |
| Total points | 170 | 91 | 131 | 124 | 516 | |
| Winners | 33 | 23 | 26 | 35 | 117 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 40% | 36% | 52% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 16 | |
| 1st in | 51/94 | 29/47 | 33/59 | 50/71 | 163/271 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 62% | 56% | 70% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 33/51 | 23/29 | 26/33 | 35/50 | 117/163 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 79% | 79% | 70% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/43 | 12/18 | 17/26 | 10/21 | 50/108 | |
| % 2nd pts | 26% | 67% | 65% | 48% | 46% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 8 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 18 | |
| Converted | 8/13 | 4/7 | 3/5 | 3/6 | 18/31 | |
| Converted % | 62% | 57% | 60% | 50% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 16 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 25 | |
| Saved | 9/16 | 1/1 | 1/2 | 5/6 | 16 | |
| Saved % | 56% | 100% | 50% | 83% | 72% | |
| Times Broken | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLLWLW
LLWWLLWWLW 
