Tristan Schoolkate and Chak Lam Coleman Wong will play each other in the quarter of the New Delhi Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 11:00 am on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Chak Lam Coleman Wong is the pick to win this match.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.86
Tristan Schoolkate -> 1.86
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tristan Schoolkate vs. Chak Lam Coleman Wong
This will be the 2nd time that Tristan Schoolkate and Chak Lam Coleman Wong play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Lam Coleman Wong (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Lam Coleman Wong won 6-7(7) 7-6(3) 7-6(2) in the quarter in the Playford Challenger back in 2023.
Tristan Schoolkate
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 44-33 | 38-24 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-30 | 30-23 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 8-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 48-29 | 24-15 | 17-11 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-20 | 8-9 | 3-5 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 237 (career-high), Schoolkate got to the quarter after beating Ramkumar Ramanathan 6-3 6-2 and Goncalo Oliveira 6-3 7-64.
In the 2nd round, Schoolkate had a good straight sets win against Oliveira (6-3 7-64). During the match, Schoolkate scored 77 points vs Oliveira’s 64. Schoolkate was extremely aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Regarding the service games, Schoolkate blasted 11 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Tristan Schoolkate was extremely effective on serve to win 82% (36/44) of his 1st serve and 60% (18/30) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Tristan broke Oliveira once after converting 50% of his break points (1/2).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Schoolkate hasn’t dropped yet a set in this tournament to win 58% of the points he played.
Schoolkate has a winning match record in the last 6 years having won 59% of his matches (135-94). 9-6 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Schoolkate has an overall81-61 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
The Australian’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Burnie 2 Challenger.
Schoolkate has a compiled 9-6 win-loss record in 2024, 9-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the New Delhi Challenger
Tristan has never competed in this tournament before.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 40-35 | 38-25 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 241, Lam Coleman Wong reached the quarter after defeating Mukund Sasikumar 6-4 4-6 7-5 and Valentin Vacherot w/o.
In the 2nd round, Chak defeated Vacherot (w/o). During the match Lam Coleman Wong and Vacherot scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 237 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. The was not very aggressive do strike just winners.
About the serving games, Lam Coleman Wong couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Chak Lam Coleman Wong conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (/) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (/) on the 2nd serve.
The has an aggregate 3-4 win-loss record in 2024, 3-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Schoolkate | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 39 | 32 |
| Pts | 139-100 | 121-109 |
| Total Points | 239 | 230 |
| Winners | 63 | 39 |
| %Winners | 45% | 32% |
Schoolkate played 2 matches while Lam Coleman Wong competed in 1 match. At the moment, Chak Lam Coleman Wong surrendered 1 set while Tristan Schoolkate hasn’t conceded a set so far. Schoolkate has played 1 set more than Lam Coleman Wong (4 vs 3). Therefore, Schoolkate played 7 games more than Lam Coleman Wong. Tristan scored 63 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Lam Coleman Wong blasted 39 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Schoolkate | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 25 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 12.5 | 13 |
| 1st in | 76/122 | 52/107 |
| %1st in | 62% | 49% |
| 1st pts | 63/76 | 39/52 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 30/46 | 25/55 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 45% |
Schoolkate struck 25 aces (12.5 per match). Lam Coleman Wong bagged 13 aces . Schoolkate won 83% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Lam Coleman Wong won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Schoolkate | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 5/15 |
| % Converted | 44% | 33% |
| Conceded | 7 | 12 |
| Saved | 7 | 8 |
| % Saved | 100% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
The Australian broke his opponents 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Schoolkate had a solid display on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 7 break points. Chak broke his opponent 5 times with a 33% conversion rate. The conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Schoolkate | ||||
| R1 Ramanathan |
R2 Oliveira |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 22 | 39 | |
| pts | 62-36 | 77-64 | 139-100 | |
| Total points | 98 | 141 | 239 | |
| Winners | 27 | 36 | 63 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 47% | 45% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 14 | 11 | 25 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 6 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 32/48 | 44/74 | 76/122 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 59% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 27/32 | 36/44 | 63/76 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 82% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/16 | 18/30 | 30/46 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 60% | 65% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 1/2 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 50% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 5 | 7 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 5/5 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Lam Coleman Wong | ||||
| R1 Kumar Mukund |
R2 Vacherot |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | w/o | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | – | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | – | 32 | |
| pts | 121-109 | – | 121-109 | |
| Total points | 230 | – | 230 | |
| Winners | 39 | – | 39 | |
| %Winners | 32% | – | 32% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 13 | – | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | – | 4 | |
| 1st in | 52/107 | – | 52/107 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | – | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 39/52 | – | 39/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | – | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/55 | – | 25/55 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | – | 45% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | – | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/15 | – | 5/15 | |
| Converted % | 33% | – | 33% | |
| Conceded | 12 | – | 12 | |
| Saved | 8/12 | – | 8 | |
| Saved % | 67% | – | 34% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | – | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWWLWWL
LWWLLWLWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Adam WaltonWalton (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
