Calvin Hemery and Damien Wenger will clash against each other in the 2^nd round of the Kigali 1 Challenger for the 1^st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:00 am on CENTER. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Calvin Hemery who should win in 3 sets.

As per the initial odds, Calvin Hemery is the pick to win this match.
Calvin Hemery -> 1.51
Damien Wenger -> 2.45

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Calvin Hemery vs. Damien Wenger

There is no head to head record between Calvin Hemery and Damien Wenger since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.

Calvin Hemery

Ranked no. 219, Hemery got to the 2^nd round after defeating David Pichler 6-2 6-3.

In the 1^st round, Calvin had a good straight sets win against Pichler (6-2 6-3). During the match, Hemery scored 64 points vs Pichler’s 40. Hemery was extremely aggressive to blast 22 winners.

Regarding the service games, Hemery scored 9 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Calvin Hemery was exceptionally effective on serve to win 76% (22/29) of his 1st serve and 72% (13/18) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Calvin broke Pichler 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).

Hemery has good record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (286-199). 1-0 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Hemery has a composed 147-92 record in the last years on clay.

Hemery has a composed 2-6 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Kigali 1 Challenger

The French player has never competed in this tournament before.

Damien Wenger

Ranked no. 382, the Swiss reached the 2^nd round after defeating Luca Fantini 6-0 7-6⁰.

In the 1^st round, Damien had a good straight sets win against Fantini (6-0 7-6⁰). During the match Wenger scored 67 points vs Fantini’s 46. Wenger was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.

About the serving games, Wenger scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Damien Wenger lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Wenger put 63% of his first serves in, winning 83% (29/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (10/21) on the 2nd serve. The Swiss broke Fantini 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).

Wenger has a composed 8-4 win-loss record in 2024, 8-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).

H2H Performance in the tournament

Matches, sets, games and points

Points	Hemery	Wenger
Match played	1	1
Tot Set	2	2
Tot Games	17	19
Pts	64-40	67-46
Total Points	104	113
Winners	22	29
%Winners	34%	43%

Both Hemery and Wenger played 1 match. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Hemery and Wenger have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Hemery played 2 games less than Wenger. Calvin scored 22 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Wenger scored 29 winners (43%).

Serve Performance

Serve	Hemery	Wenger
Aces	9	1
Avg per match	9	1
1st in	29/47	35/56
%1st in	62%	63%
1st pts	22/29	29/35
%1st pts	76%	83%
2nd pts	13/18	10/21
%2nd pts	72%	48%

Hemery fired 9 aces . Wenger recorded 1 ace . Hemery won 76% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 72% of the points. On the other side, Wenger won 83% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks	Hemery	Wenger
Won	4	4
Converted	4/7	4/5
% Converted	57%	80%
Conceded	2	4
Saved	1	3
% Saved	50%	75%
Times Broken	1	1

Calvin broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Hemery conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Wenger broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Damien conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.

Hemery
	R1 Pichler	Total
Score	6-2 6-3
Tot Set	2	2
Tot Games	17	17
pts	64-40	64-40
Total points	104	104
Winners	22	22
%Winners	34%	34%
SERVE
Aces	9	9
Double Faults	1	1
1st in	29/47	29/47
% 1st in	62%	62%
1st pts	22/29	22/29
% 1st pts	76%	76%
2nd pts	13/18	13/18
% 2nd pts	72%	72%
Breaks
Won	4	4
Converted	4/7	4/7
Converted %	57%	57%
Conceded	2	2
Saved	1/2	1
Saved %	50%	50%
Times Broken	1	1

Wenger
	R1 Fantini	Total
Score	6-0 7-60
Tot Set	2	2
Tot Games	19	19
pts	67-46	67-46
Total points	113	113
Winners	29	29
%Winners	43%	43%
SERVE
Aces	1	1
Double Faults	4	4
1st in	35/56	35/56
% 1st in	63%	63%
1st pts	29/35	29/35
% 1st pts	83%	83%
2nd pts	10/21	10/21
% 2nd pts	48%	48%
Breaks
Won	4	4
Converted	4/5	4/5
Converted %	80%	80%
Conceded	4	4
Saved	3/4	3
Saved %	75%	75%
Times Broken	1	1

Tennis Scores in Kigali 1 Challenger

• Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Noah SchachterSchachter (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
• Preston BrownBrown – S D Prajwal DevD Prajwal Dev (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
• Emilien VoisinVoisin – Aziz OuakaaOuakaa (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
• Yshai OlielOliel – Ivan DenisovDenisov (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
• Calvin HemeryHemery – David PichlerPichler (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
• Stefan KozlovKozlov – Clement TaburTabur (6-4 7-6⁴) – See score progression
• Juan Pablo PazPablo Paz – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (7-6⁹ 6-1) – See score progression
• Guy Orly IradukundaOrly Iradukunda – Jacob BrummBrumm (3-6 6-4 7-6³) – See score progression
• Lucas BouquetBouquet – Benjamin LockLock (4-6 7-6² 6-3) – See score progression
• Corentin DenollyDenolly – Hernan CasanovaCasanova (7-6² 7-5) – See score progression
• Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Joshua SheehySheehy (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
• Damien WengerWenger – Luca FantiniFantini (6-0 7-6⁰) – See score progression
• Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Bogdan BobrovBobrov (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
• Gabriele PennafortiPennaforti – Ivan GakhovGakhov (5-7 6-3 7-6³) – See score progression
• Daniel CukiermanCukierman – Ernest HabiyambereHabiyambere (6-1 7-6⁷) – See score progression
• Corentin DenollyDenolly – Hernan CasanovaCasanova (7-6(2) 7-5) – See score progression
• Preston BrownBrown – S D Prajwal DevD Prajwal Dev (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
• Max HoukesHoukes – Alafia AyeniAyeni (6-1 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
• Calvin HemeryHemery – David PichlerPichler (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
• Damien WengerWenger – Luca FantiniFantini (6-0 7-6(0)) – See score progression
• Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Bogdan BobrovBobrov (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
• Juan Pablo PazPablo Paz – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (7-6(9) 6-1) – See score progression
• Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Joshua SheehySheehy (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
• Emilien VoisinVoisin – Aziz OuakaaOuakaa (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
• Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Noah SchachterSchachter (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
• Lucas BouquetBouquet – Benjamin LockLock (4-6 7-6(2) 6-3) – See score progression
• Yshai OlielOliel – Ivan DenisovDenisov (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
• Stefan KozlovKozlov – Clement TaburTabur (6-4 7-6(4)) – See score progression

Upcoming matches in the draw

• Calvin HemeryHemery – Damien WengerWenger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Juan Pablo PazPablo Paz (1-0) – H2H and prediction
• Daniel CukiermanCukierman – Stefan KozlovKozlov (1-0) – H2H and prediction
• Lucas BouquetBouquet – Yshai OlielOliel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Preston BrownBrown – Max HoukesHoukes (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Emilien VoisinVoisin – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Guy Orly IradukundaOrly Iradukunda (0-0) – H2H and prediction