Valentin Vacherot and Chak Lam Coleman Wong will play each other in the 2nd round of the New Delhi Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 1:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Valentin Vacherot who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Valentin Vacherot is the pick to win this match.
Valentin Vacherot -> 1.37
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 2.93
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Valentin Vacherot vs. Chak Lam Coleman Wong
There is no head to head record between Valentin Vacherot and Chak Lam Coleman Wong since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Valentin Vacherot
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-13 | 19-3 | 15-9 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 55-32 | 6-4 | 49-25 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-22 | 27-12 | 18-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 39-14 | 36-8 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 147 (career-high), the Monegasque reached the 2nd round after defeating Jonas Forejtek 6-4 6-75 7-64.
In the 1st round, The Monegasque defeated Forejtek (6-4 6-75 7-64). During the match, Vacherot scored 123 points vs Forejtek’s 121. Vacherot was pretty aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Talking about the service games, Vacherot struck 4 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Valentin Vacherot lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Vacherot put 60% of his first serves in, winning 67% (48/72) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (27/49) on the 2nd serve. Vacherot broke Forejtek 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Vacherot has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 67% of his matches (213-106). 17-1 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Vacherot has an aggregate104-36 match record in the last 9 years on hard.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Nonthaburi 1 Challenger where he overcame Lucas Pouille in the final 3-2 ret. and the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger where he beat Manuel Guinard in the final 7-5 7-6(5) and the Pune Challenger where he overcame Adam Walton in the final 3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(5).
Vacherot has an overall 17-1 win-loss record in 2024, 17-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the New Delhi Challenger
Vacherot has never competed in this tournament before.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-27 | 33-20 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 241, Chak reached the 2nd round after defeating Mukund Sasikumar 6-4 4-6 7-5.
In the 1st round, Chak defeated Kumar Mukund (6-4 4-6 7-5). During the match Lam Coleman Wong scored 121 points vs Kumar Mukund’s 109. Chak was pretty aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about serving, Lam Coleman Wong made 13 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost the serve 4 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Lam Coleman Wong put 49% of his first serves in, winning 75% (39/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (25/55) on the 2nd serve. The broke Kumar Mukund 5 times after converting 33% of his break points (5/15).
Lam Coleman Wong has an overall 3-4 win-loss record in 2024, 3-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Vacherot | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 36 | 32 |
| Pts | 123-121 | 121-109 |
| Total Points | 244 | 230 |
| Winners | 48 | 39 |
| %Winners | 39% | 32% |
Both Vacherot and Lam Coleman Wong played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Valentin Vacherot dropped 1 set, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Vacherot and Lam Coleman Wong have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Vacherot played 4 games more than Lam Coleman Wong. The Monegasque scored 48 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Chak blasted 39 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Vacherot | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 13 |
| 1st in | 72/121 | 52/107 |
| %1st in | 60% | 49% |
| 1st pts | 48/72 | 39/52 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 27/49 | 25/55 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 45% |
Vacherot bagged 4 aces . Lam Coleman Wong made 13 aces . Vacherot won 67% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Lam Coleman Wong won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Vacherot | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 5/15 |
| % Converted | 44% | 33% |
| Conceded | 6 | 12 |
| Saved | 3 | 8 |
| % Saved | 50% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 |
The Monegasque broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Valentin conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The broke his opponent 5 times with a 33% conversion rate. Lam Coleman Wong conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Vacherot | |||
| R1 Forejtek |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-75 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 36 | 36 | |
| pts | 123-121 | 123-121 | |
| Total points | 244 | 244 | |
| Winners | 48 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 72/121 | 72/121 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 48/72 | 48/72 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 27/49 | 27/49 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||
| R1 Kumar Mukund |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 121-109 | 121-109 | |
| Total points | 230 | 230 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 13 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 52/107 | 52/107 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 39/52 | 39/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/55 | 25/55 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/15 | 5/15 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 8/12 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWWWLWW
WWLWWWWWLW Tennis Scores in New Delhi Challenger
- Samuel Vincent RuggeriVincent Ruggeri – Siddharth VishwakarmaVishwakarma (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Dane SweenySweeny – Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski (6-72 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (6-3 6-72 7-67) – See score progression
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (6-2 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Bernard TomicTomic (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Adam WaltonWalton – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Moez EcharguiEchargui (6-3 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle – Fitriadi M RifqiM Rifqi (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (6-4 6-75 7-64) – See score progression
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (6-76 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Mukund SasikumarSasikumar (6-4 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Federico GaioGaio – Karan SinghSingh (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Goncalo OliveiraOliveira – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (6-3 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle – Fitriadi M RifqiM Rifqi (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Dane SweenySweeny – Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski (6-7(2) 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Samuel Vincent RuggeriVincent Ruggeri – Siddharth VishwakarmaVishwakarma (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Bernard TomicTomic (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (6-2 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Moez EcharguiEchargui (6-3 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Adam WaltonWalton – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle – Federico GaioGaio (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Adam WaltonWalton (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Dane SweenySweeny (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Goncalo OliveiraOliveira (0-0) – H2H and prediction
