Hazem Naow and Eliakim Coulibaly will play each other in the qualifications of the Lille Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:30 am on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hazem Naow who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Hazem Naow is the pick to win this match.
Hazem Naow -> 1.444
Eliakim Coulibaly -> 2.64
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Hazem Naow vs. Eliakim Coulibaly
There is no head to head record between Hazem Naow and Eliakim Coulibaly since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Hazem Naow
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 27-11 | 0-0 | 8-5 | 16-5 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
| 2023 | 48-24 | 17-5 | 25-14 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 5-4 |
| 2022 | 23-17 | 14-6 | 8-9 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 42-18 | 32-13 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 5-1 |
| 2020 | 3-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 348 (career-high), the Syrian reached the qualifications after defeating Cyril Vandermeersch 7-5 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Syrian had a good straight sets win against Vandermeersch (7-5 6-3). During the match, Naow scored 77 points vs Vandermeersch’s 65. The Syrian was pretty aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about the service games, Naow scored just 1 ace in the match and he committed only 4 double faults. Hazem Naow lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Naow put 63% of his first serves in, winning 69% (35/51) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (14/30) on the 2nd serve. The Syrian broke Vandermeersch 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Naow has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 67% of his matches (144-72). 12-3 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Naow has a composed15-6 record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Hazem’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Kish Island.
Naow has an aggregate 22-5 win-loss record in 2024, 12-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lille Challenger
Hazem has never competed in this tournament before.
Eliakim Coulibaly
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-13 | 12-7 | 6-3 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-23 | 36-17 | 0-0 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-16 | 32-10 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-11 | 28-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 448, Eliakim reached the qualifications after defeating Ricardas Berankis 6-3 7-5.
In the qualifications, Coulibaly had a good straight sets win against Berankis (6-3 7-5). During the match Coulibaly scored 73 points vs Berankis’s 58. Eliakim was very aggressive to blast 36 winners.
About the serving games, Coulibaly recorded 9 aces and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Eliakim Coulibaly was very effective on serve to win 72% (36/50) of his 1st serve and 55% (11/20) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Coulibaly broke Berankis 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
The Ivorian’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in M15 Bressuire.
The Ivorian has a compiled 7-4 win-loss record in 2024, 5-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Naow | Coulibaly |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 |
| Pts | 77-65 | 73-58 |
| Total Points | 142 | 131 |
| Winners | 35 | 36 |
| %Winners | 45% | 49% |
Both Naow and Coulibaly played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Naow and Coulibaly have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (21). Hazem scored 35 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The Ivorian made 36 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Naow | Coulibaly |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 9 |
| 1st in | 51/81 | 50/70 |
| %1st in | 63% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 35/51 | 36/50 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 14/30 | 11/20 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 55% |
Naow scored 1 ace . Coulibaly also blasted 9 aces . Naow won 69% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Coulibaly won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Naow | Coulibaly |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 3/4 |
| % Converted | 57% | 75% |
| Conceded | 6 | 8 |
| Saved | 4 | 7 |
| % Saved | 67% | 88% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Naow broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Hazem surrendered his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Eliakim broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. The Ivorian conceded his serve once and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded.
| Naow | |||
| Q1 Vandermeersch |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 77-65 | 77-65 | |
| Total points | 142 | 142 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 51/81 | 51/81 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 35/51 | 35/51 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/30 | 14/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Coulibaly | |||
| Q1 Berankis |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 73-58 | 73-58 | |
| Total points | 131 | 131 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 50/70 | 50/70 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 36/50 | 36/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/20 | 11/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 7/8 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 88% | 88% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLLWWLW
LWLWWWLWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Radu AlbotAlbot – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benoit PairePaire – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Joris De LooreDe Loore – Zizou BergsBergs (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Kenny de Schepperde Schepper (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Tibo ColsonColson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas PoullainPoullain – Tristan LamasineLamasine (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Lucas PouillePouille (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Henri SquireSquire – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
